View More View Less
  • 1 SZTE BTK Pszichológiai Intézet Szeged
  • | 2 Université de Reims Laboratoire de Psychologie Appliquée Reims
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $204.00

Vizsgálatunk célja az volt, hogy dolgozó felnőtteken (N = 544, F = 227, N = 317) teszteljük az általunk összeállított munka-család egyensúly kérdőívet. Ennek mért dimenziói a munkából származó család-konfliktus, a családból származó munka-konfliktus, az élettel és munkával való elégedettség, valamint a családba és munkába bevonódás voltak. A kérdőív egészének és egyes aldimenzióinak érvényességét feltérképező és ellenőrző faktoranalízissel vizsgáltuk, valamint a faktorok belső konzisztenciáját is elemeztük. Strukturális egyenlet modellezés segítségével (SEM) megvizsgáltuk továbbá a dimenziók egymással való kapcsolati hálóját egy olyan modellben, amelyben a fenti tényezők mellett szerepeltek a munkahelyi klíma (szakmailag támogató és feszült), a munkával kapcsolatos követelmények (munkaórák és túlórák mennyisége), valamint demográfiai adatok (családi állapot és gyermekek száma) hatásai is. Azonfelül, hogy erősen összekapcsolódó rendszerről kaptunk így információkat, elkülönítettük a munkából származó család- és családból származó munka-konfliktus egyedi hátterét is. A feltárt modell kapcsán egyrészt megjelentek a szakirodalom által elvárt hatások és kapcsolatok, másrészt új kapcsolati mintázatokat is sikerült feltárni.

  • Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435.

  • Aryee, S., Fields, D., & Luk, V. (1999). A cross-cultural test of a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Management, 25(4), 491–511.

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Boer, E. D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 341–356.

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 83–104.

  • Bauer, E. M. (2009). Top executives’ work relationship and work-family balance: Taxonomy development and performance implications. Wiesbaden: Gabler GWV Fachverlage GmbH.

  • Batt, R., & Valcour, P. M. (2003). Human resources practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 189–220.

  • Beatty, C. A. (1996). The stress of managerial and professional women: Is the price too high? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(3), 233–251.

  • Broadhead, R. S. (1980). Multiple identities and the process of their articulation: The case of medical students and their private lives. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 3, 171–191.

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.

  • Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (2002). Stress at home, peace at work: A test of the time bind hypothesis. Social Science Quarterly, 83(4), 905–920.

  • Burke, R. J. (1988). Some antecedents and consequences of work-family conflict. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 287–302.

  • Burke, R. J. (2001). Organizational values, work experiences, and satisfactions among managerial and professional women. Journal of Management Development, 20(4), 346–354.

  • Burke, R. J., & Greenglass, E. (1987). Work and family. In C. L. Cooper, & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 273–320). New York: Wiley.

  • Burke, R. J., Richardsen, A. M., & Mortinussen, M. (2004). Workaholism among norwegian managers work and well-being outcomes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(5), 459–470.

  • Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecendents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.

  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131–164.

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree Test for the Number of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

  • Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Gender differences in work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 60–74.

  • Firth-Cozens, J. (2001). Interventions to improve physicians’ well-being and patient care. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 215–222.

  • Frone, M., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. (1992). Prevalence of work-family conflict: Are work and family boundaries symmetrically permeable? Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 13(7), 723–729.

  • Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1994). Relationship between job and family satisfaction: Causal or noncausal covariation. Journal of Management, 20(3), 565–579.

  • Frone, M. R., & Russell, M. (1995). Job stressors, job involvement and employee health: A test of identity theory. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 68(1), 1–11.

  • Fuß, I., Nübling M., Hasselhorn, H., Schwappach, D., & Rieger, M. (2008). Working conditions and work-family conflict in German hospital physicians: Psychosocial and organisational predictors and consequences. BMC Public Health, 8, 353.

  • Goffman, E. (1981). A hétköznapi élet szociálpszichológiája. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó.

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources and conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.

  • Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560–568.

  • Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis, Psychometrika, 19, 149–161.

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.

  • Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491.

  • Hegney, D., Plank, A., & Parker, V. (2006). Extrinsic and intrinsic work values: Their impact on job satisfaction in nursing. Journal of Nursing Management, 14, 271–281.

  • Higgins, C. A., Duxbury, L. E., & Irving, R. K. (1992). Work-family conflict in the dual-career family. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 51–57.

  • Hill, E. J., Yang, C., Hawkins, A. J., & Ferris, M. (2004). A cross-cultural test of the work-family interface in 48 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1300–1316.

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

  • Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Badawy, M. K. (1994). Work experiences, job involvement, and quality of work life among information systems personnel. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 175–201.

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Kim, J., & Tech, V. (1999). Financial satisfaction, personal finance-work conflict, and work outcomes: Pay satisfaction, organizational commitment, and productivity. Proceedings of the Association for Financial Counseling and Planning Education Annual Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, 38–45.

  • Knudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., & Roman, P. M. (2009). Turnover intention and emotional exhaustion “at the top”: adapting the job demands-resources model to leaders of addiction treatment organizations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 84–95.

  • Lingard, H., & Francis, V. (2005). Does work-family conflict mediate the relationship between job schedule demands and burnout in male construction professionals and managers?. Construction Management & Economics, 23(7), 733–745.

  • Lu, L., Gilmour, R., Kao, S.-F., & Huang, M.-T. (2006). A cross-cultural study of work/family demands, work/family conflict and wellbeing: The Taiwanese vs. British. Career Development International, 11(1), 9–27.

  • Martins, L. L., Eddleston, K. A., & Veiga, J. F. (2002). Moderators of the relationship between work-family conflict and career satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 399–409.

  • Mészáros A. (2006). Differenciálódás a munkahelyi csoportokban: szerepek. In Mészáros A. (Szerk.), A munkahely szociálpszichológiai jelenségvilága (pp. 483–497). Miskolc: Z-Press Kiadó.

  • Montgomery, A. J., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Ouden, M. D. (2003). Work-home interference among newspaper managers: Its relationship with burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16(2), 195–211.

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 400–410.

  • Noblet, A., Rodwell, J., & McWilliams, J. (2001). The job strain model is enough for managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(8), 635–649.

  • OECD (2008). Economic policy reforms:Going for growth. Letöltve 2011. 04. 19. http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/2480/Counting_the_hours.html

  • Parasuraman, S., Greenhaus, J. H., & Granrose, C. S. (1992). Role stressors, social support, and well-being among two-career couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(4), 339–356.

  • Pálfi F., Vranesicsné Horváth I., Németh K. és Betlehem J. (2007). Az ápolók mentálhigiénés állapota, és a kiégési szindrómát provokáló faktorok előfordulása a vizsgált populációban. Nővér. Az ápolás elmélete és gyakorlata, 20(4), 3–13.

  • Pikó B. (2001). A nővéri munka magatartástudományi vizsgálata. Pszichoszomatikus tünetek, munkahelyi stressz, társas támogatás. Lege Artis Medicinae, 11(4), 318–325.

  • Piotrkowski, C. S., Rapoport, R. N., & Rapoport, R. (1987). Families and work. In M. Sussman, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family (pp. 251–283). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Rózsa S., Kő N., Csoboth Cs., Purebl Gy., Beöthy-Molnár A., Szebik I. és munkatársai (2005). Stressz és megküzdés. A Rahe-féle rövidített stressz és megküzdés kérdőívvel szerzett hazai eredmények ismertetése. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika 6(4), 275–294.

  • Sabo, B. M. (2006). Compassion fatigue and nursing work: Can we accurately capture the consequences of caring work? International Journal of Nursing Practice, 12, 136–142.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.

  • Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337.

  • Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I., et al. (2004). A cross-national comparative study of work-family stressors, working hours and well-being: China and Latin America versus the anglo world. Personnel Psychology, 57, 119–142.

  • Szlávicz Á. (2010). A ,,Dolgozó magyarok 2006” dolgozói elégedettség felmérés módszertani elemzése (publikálatlan doktori disszertáció). Gödöllő: Szent István Egyetem.

  • Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Taris, T. W., Beckers, D. G. J., Verhoeven, L. C., Geurts, S. A. E., Kompier, M. A. J., & van der Linden, D. (2006). Recovery opportunities, work-home interference, and well-being among managers. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 15(2), 139–157.

  • Tay, C., Quazi, H., & Kelly, K. (2006). A multi-dimensional construct of work-life system: its link to employee attitudes and outcomes. Idézi: Bauer, E. M. (2009). Top executives’ work relationship and work-family balance: Taxonomy development and performance implications. Wiesbaden: Gabler GWV Fachverlage GmbH.

  • Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2001). Work-nonwork conflict and the phenomenology of time. Work & Occupations, 28(1), 17–39.

  • Veenhoven, R. (1989). Does happiness bind? marriage chances of the unhappy. In R. Veenhoven, & A. Hagenaars (Eds.), How Harmful is Happiness? Consequences of Enjoying Life or not (pp. 44–60). Rotterdam: Universitaire Pers Rotterdam.

  • Wall, G. D., Capela, L. M., & Greene, W. E. (2001). Towards a source stressors model of conflict between work and family. Review of Business, 22, 86–91.

  • Wang, P., Lawler, J., & Shi, K. (2010). Work-family conflict, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and gender: Evidences from Asia. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 17, 298.

  • Zedeck, S. (1992). Introduction: Exploring the domain of work and family concerns. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Work, Families, and Organizations (pp. 1–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fülöp, Márta

Chair of the Editorial Board:
Molnár, Márk

          Area Editors

  • Bereczkei Tamás (Evolutionary psychology)
  • Demetrovics Zsolt (Clinical psychology)
  • Egyed Katalin (Developmental psychology)
  • Hámori Eszter (Clinical child psychology)
  • Molnárné Kovács Judit (Social psychology)
  • Rózsa Sándor (Personality psychology and psychometrics)
  • Nguyen Luu Lan Anh (Cross-cultural psychology)
  • Pléh Csaba (Book Review)
  • Sass Judit (Industrial and organizational psychology)
  • Szabó Éva (Educational psychology)
  • Urbán Róbert (Health psychology)
  • Csákvári Judit (Psychology of special education)
  • Faragó Klára (Organizational psychology)
  • Kéri Szabolcs (Experimental and Neuropsychology)

 

        Editorial Board

  • Császár Noémi
  • Csépe Valéria
  • Dúll Andrea
  • Ehmann Bea
  • Erős Ferenc
  • Gervai Judit
  • Kiss Enikő Csilla
  • Kiss Paszkál
  • Mészáros Judit
  • Németh Dezső
  • Oláh Attila
  • Péley Bernadette
  • Perczel-Forintos Dóra
  • Révész György
  • Winkler István
  • Molnár Márk
  • Fülöp Márta

 

Secretary of the editorial board: 

  •  Saád Judit

 

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
ELTE PPK Pszichológiai Intézet
Address: H-1064 Budapest, Izabella u. 46.
E-mail: pszichoszemle@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • PsycINFO
  • Scopus

2020  
Scimago
H-index
7
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,142
Scimago
Quartile Score
Psychology (miscellaneous) Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
17/111=0,2
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
General Psychology 199/203 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,079
Scopus
Cites
53
Scopus
Documents
24
Days from submission to acceptance 116
Days from acceptance to publication 225
Acceptance
Rate
81%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
6
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,139
Scimago
Quartile Score
Psychology (miscellaneous) Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
24/103=0,2
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
General Psychology 192/204 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,113
Scopus
Cites
35
Scopus
Documents
14
Acceptance
Rate
58%

 

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Online subsscription: 152 EUR / 216 USD
Print + online subscription: 184 EUR / 244 USD
Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
Language Hungarian
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1928
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 76
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Pszichológiai Társaság 
Founder's
Address
H-1075 Budapest, Hungary Kazinczy u. 23-27. I/116. 
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0025-0279 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2799 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Feb 2021 3 1 2
Mar 2021 23 2 2
Apr 2021 19 0 0
May 2021 6 0 0
Jun 2021 21 0 0
Jul 2021 3 0 0
Aug 2021 0 0 0