Author: Anna Bátki
View More View Less
  • 1 Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Pszichológia Intézet Budapest
  • | 2 Vadaskert Gyermek- és Ifjúságpszichiátriai Kórház és Szakambulancia Budapest
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $204.00

Számtalan nemzetközi vizsgálat igazolta, hogy az intézetekből örökbefogadott gyerekek, bár sok területen jelentős fejlődést mutatnak, még évekkel családba kerülésük után is sok szocioemocionális problémával küzdenek. Nagyon keveset tudunk azonban azokról a folyamatokról, amelyeken keresztül a korai élmények ezekhez a fejlődési problémákhoz vezetnek. Az itt bemutatott vizsgálat célja az érzelemregulációs képességek fejlődésének jobb megismerése örökbefogadott gyermekeknél, mivel ezen képességek alapvető feltételei a pszichés egészségnek, a hatékony társas működésnek. A vizsgálat központi hipotézise, hogy azok a gyerekek, akik életük első (minimum) 6 hónapját intézetben töltötték, fejletlenebb érzelemregulációs képességgel rendelkeznek. A vizsgálatban 90 4 és 6 év közötti gyerek vett részt, akik a 3 vizsgálati csoport egyikébe tartoztak: 1. olyan gyerekek, akik születésükkor gyermekotthonba kerültek, és ott éltek örökbefogadásukig, de leg¬alább 6 hónapos korukig; 2. csecsemőkorban (6 hetes koruk előtt) örökbefogadott gyerekek; 3. (kontroll) vér szerinti családjukban élő gyerekek. A vizsgálat során az érzelemregulációs képességet a játék-narratívák elemzésével (MacArthur Story Stem Battery) vizsgáltuk. A három vizsgálati csoport összehasonlításának eredményeit összefoglalva elmondható, hogy igazolódott az a hipotézis, miszerint az intézeti gondozás egyik fontos következménye az elmaradás az érzelemregulációs képességekben. Ugyanakkor az eredmények arra is felhívják a figyelmet, hogy az újszülött korban örökbefogadott gyerekek bizonyos érzelemregulációs képességei is, bár jóval kevésbé, de eltérnek a vér szerinti kontrollcsoportétól. Ez az eredmény összefüggésbe hozható egyrészt pre- és perinatális tényezőkkel, másrészt pedig az örökbefogadó szülők és család jellegzetességeivel, valamint az örökbefogadottság tényéből következő vulnerabilitással.

  • Ames, E. W., & Chisholm, K. (2001). Social and emotional development in children adopted from institutions. In D. B. Bailey, Jr., J. T. Bruer, F. J. Symons, & J. W. Lichtman (Eds.), Critical thinking about critical periods (pp. 129–148). Baltimore, MD, US: Paul H Brookes Publishing.

  • Ariel, S. (2005). Family play therapy. In C. Schaefer, J. McCormick, & A. Ohnogi (Eds.), International handbook of play therapy: Advances in assessment, theory, research, and practice (pp. 3–22). Lanham, MD, US: Jason Aronson.

  • Ariel, S., Carel, C. A., & Tyano, S. (1985). Uses of children’s make-believe play in family therapy: Theory and clinical examples. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy,11(1), 47–60.

  • Beckett, C., Bredenkamp, D., Castle, J., Groothues, C., O’Connor, T. G., & Rutter, M. (2002). Behavior patterns associated with institutional deprivation: a study of children adopted from Romania. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 23(5), 297–303.

  • Blatt, S. J. (1995). Representational structures in psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti, & S. Toth (Eds.), Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology: Vol. 6. Emotion, cognition, and representation (pp. 1–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

  • Bornstein, M. H. (1987). Sensitive Periods in Development: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

  • Bornstein, M. H., & Tamis-Le Monda, C. S. (1995). Parent-child symbolic play: Three theories in search of an effect. Developmental Review, 15, 382–400.

  • Bretherton, I. (1989). Pretense: The form and function of make-believe play. Developmental Review, 9(4), 383–401.

  • Bretherton, I. (1990). Open communication and internal working models: Their role in the development of attachment relationships. In R. Thompson (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 36. Socioemotional development (pp. 59–113). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. (1989). Pretense: Acting “as if.” In J. J. Lockman, & N. L. Hazen (Eds.), Action in social context: Perspectives on early development (pp. 239–271). New York, NY, US: Plenum Press.

  • Bretherton, I., Oppenheim, D., Buchsbaum, H., Emde, R., & MacArthur Narrative Working Group (2003). The MacArthur Story Stem Battery. In R. N. Emde, D. P. Wolf, & D. Oppenheim (Eds.), Revealing the inner worlds of young children: The MacArthur Story Stem Battery and parent-child narratives (pp. 381–396). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Buchsbaum, H. K., Toth, S. L., Clyman, R. B., Cicchetti, D., & Emde, R. N. (1992). The use of a narrative story stem technique with maltreated children: Implications for theory and practice. Development and Psychopathology, 4(04), 603–625.

  • Calkins, S. D. (1994). Origins and outcomes of individual differences in emotion regulation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 53–72.

  • Carlson, M., & Earls, F. (1997). Psychological and neuroendocrinological sequelae of early social deprivation in institutionalized children in Romania. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 807, 419–428.

  • Carlson, M., Dragomir, C., Earls, F., Farrell, M., Macovei, O., Nystrom, P., & Sparling, J. (1995). Effects of social deprivation on cortisol regulation in institutionalized Romanian infants. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts, 218(12), 524.

  • Chugani, H. T., Behen, M. E., Muzik, O., Juhasz, C., Nagy, F., & Chugani, D. C. (2001). Local brain functional activity following early deprivation: a study of postinstitutionalized Romanian orphans. Neuroimage, 14(6), 1290–1301.

  • Cicchetti, D., Ganiban, J., & Barnett, D. (1991). Contributions from the study of high-risk populations to understanding the development of emotion regulation. In J. Garber, & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation (pp. 15–48). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

  • Clyman, R. B. (2003). Portrayals in Maltreated Children’s Play Narratives: Representations or Emotion Regulation? In R. N. Emde, D. P. Wolf, & D. Oppenheim (Eds.), Revealing the inner worlds of young children: The MacArthur Story Stem Battery and parent-child narratives (pp. 201–221). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Teti, L. O. (1994). The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation: a clinical perspective. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 73–100.

  • Crittenden, P. M. (1990). Internal representational models of attachment relationships. Infant Mental Health Journal, 11, 259–277.

  • De Lorimier, S., Doyle, A., & Tessier, O. (1995). Social coordination during pretend play: Comparisons with nonpretend play and effects on expressive content. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41(4), 497–516.

  • Denham, S. A., Zoller, D., & Couchoud, E. A. (1994). Socialization of preschoolers’ emotion understanding. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 928–936.

  • Emde, R. N., Wolf, D. P., & Oppenheim, D. (Eds.) (2003). Revealing the inner worlds of young children: The MacArthur Story Stem Battery and parent-child narratives. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Erikson, E. H. (1977). Toys and reasons. New York: Norton.

  • Fein, G. G. (1989). Mind, meaning, and affect: Proposals for a theory of pretense. Developmental Review, 9(4), 345–363.

  • Fisher, L., Ames, E. W., Chisholm, K., & Savoie, L. (1997). Problems reported by parents of Romanian orphans adopted to British Columbia. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(1), 67–82.

  • Fivush, R., Hazzard, A., Sales, J. M., Sarfati, D., & Brown, T. (2003). Creating coherence out of chaos? Children’s narratives of emotionally positive and negative events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 1–19.

  • Futh, A., O’Connor, T. G., Matias, C., Green, J., & Scott, S. (2008). Attachment narratives and behavioral and emotional symptoms in an ethnically diverse, at-risk sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(6), 709–718.

  • Golomb, C., & Galasso, L. (1995). Make believe and reality: Explorations of the imaginary realm. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 800–810.

  • Greenough, W. T., & Black, J. E. (1992). Induction of brain structure by experience: Substrates for cognitive development. In M. R. Gunnar, & C. A. Nelson (Eds.), Developmental behavioral neuroscience (pp. 155–200). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  • Greenough, W. T., Black, J. E., & Wallace, C. S. (1987). Experience and brain development. Child Development, 58(3), 539–559.

  • Grolnick, W. S., McMenamy, J. M., & Kurowski, C. O. (2003). Emotional self-regulation in infancy and toddlerhood. In L. Balter, & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child Psychology: A Handbook of Contemporary Issues (pp. 3–25). New York: Psychology Press.

  • Gross, J. J., & Munoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2(2), 151–164.

  • Gunnar, M. R. (2000). Early adversity and the development of stress reactivity and regulation. In C. A. Nelson (Ed.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, 31: The effects of early adversity on neurobehavioral development (pp. 163–200). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Gunnar, M. R. (2001). Effects of early deprivation: Findings from orphanage-reared infants and children, In C. A. Nelson, & M. Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 617–629). Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Gunnar, M. R., Morison, S. J., Chisholm, K., & Schuder, M. (2001). Salivary cortisol levels in children adopted from romanian orphanages. Development & Psychopathology, 13(3), 611–628.

  • Gunnar, M. R., van Dulmen, M. H., & International Adoption Project Team (2007). Behavior problems in postinstitutionalized internationally adopted children. Development & Psychopathology, 19(1), 129–148.

  • Heim, C., Owens, M. J., Plotsky, P. M., & Nemeroff, C. B. (1997). The role of early adverse life events in the etiology of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. Focus on corticotropin-releasing factor. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 821, 194–207.

  • Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (2005). Brain and visual perception: The story of a 25-year collaboration. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

  • Johnson, D. E. (2000). The impact of orphanage rearing on growth and development. In C. A. Nelson (Ed.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, 31: The effects of early adversity on neurobehavioral development (pp. 113–162). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Macfie, J., Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (2001). Dissociation in maltreated versus nonmaltreated preschool-aged children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 1253–1267.

  • Macfie, J., Toth, S. L., Rogosch, F. A., Robinson, J., Emde, R. N., & Cicchetti, D. (1999). Effect of maltreatment on preschoolers’ narrative representations of responses to relieve distress and of role reversal. Developmental Psychology, 35, 460–465.

  • Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1–2), 66–104.

  • McCrone, E. R., Egeland, B., Kalkoske, M., & Carlson, E. A. (1994). Relation between early maltreatment and mental representations of relationships assessed with projective storytelling in middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 99–120.

  • O’Connor, T. G., Bredenkamp, D., Rutter, M., & ERA Study Team (1999). Attachment disturbances and disorders in children exposed to early severe deprivation. Infant Mental Health Journal, 20, 10–29.

  • Oppenheim, D., & Waters, H. S. (1995). Narrative processes and attachment representations: Issues of development and assessment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(2–3), 197–215.

  • Oppenheim, D., Nir, A., Warren, S., & Emde, R. N. (1997). Emotion regulation in mother-child narrative co-construction: Associations with children’s narratives and adaptation. Developmental Psychology, 33, 284–294.

  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.

  • Pollak, S. D. (2005). Early adversity and mechanisms of plasticity: Integrating affective neuroscience with developmental approaches to psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 735–752.

  • Robinson, J., & Mantz-Simmons, L. (2003). The MacArthur Narrative Coding System: One approach to highlighting affective meaning making in the MacArthur Story Stem Battery. In R. N. Emde, D. P. Wolf, & D. Oppenheim (Eds.), Revealing the Inner Worlds of Young Children: The MacArthur Story Stem Battery and Parent-Child Narratives (pp. 81–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Robinson, J., Herot, C., Haynes, P., & Mantz-Simmons, L. (2000). Children’s story stem responses: A measure of program impact on developmental risks associated with dysfunctional parenting. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 99–110.

  • Rutter, M. (1981). Maternal deprivation reassessed. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Book.

  • Rutter, M. (2006). Genes and behavior: Nature-nurture interplay explained. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

  • Rutter, M., & English and Romanian Adoptees Study Team (1998). Developmental catch-up, and deficits, following adoption after severe global early privation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 465–476.

  • Rutter, M., Andersen-Wood, L., Beckett, C., Bredenkamp, D., Castle, J., & Groothues, C. (1999). Quasi-autistic patterns following severe early global privation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 537–549.

  • Rutter, M., Beckett, C., Castle, J., Colvert, E., Kreppner, J., Mehta, M., Stevens, S., & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2007). Effects of profound early institutional deprivation: An overview of findings from a UK longitudinal study of Romanian adoptees. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 332–350.

  • Rutter, M., Kreppner, J. M., & O’Connor, T. G. (2001). Specificity and heterogeneity in children’s responses to profound institutional privation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 97–103.

  • Rutter, M., O’Connor, T. G., & English Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team (2004). Are there biological programming effects for psychological development? Findings from a study of Romanian adoptees. Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 81–94.

  • Schore, A. N. (1999). Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Sher-Censor, E., & Oppenheim, D. (2004). Coherence and Representations in Preschoolers’ Narratives: Associations With Attachment in Infancy. In M. W. Pratt, & B. H. Fiese (Eds.), Family stories and the life course: Across time and generations (pp. 77–107). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Solomon, J., & George, C. (1999). The Place of Disorganisation in Attechment Theory In J. Solomon, & C. George (Eds.), Attachment disorganization (pp. 3–32). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Solomon, J., George, C., & DeJong, A. (1995). Children classified as controlling at age six: Evidence of disorganized representational strategies and aggression at home and at school. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 447–463.

  • Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 25–52.

  • Thompson, R. A., & Meyer, S. (2007). Socialization of Emotion Regulation in the Family. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 249–268). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Toth, S. L., Cicchetti, D., Macfie, J., & Emde, R. N. (1997). Representations of self and other in the narratives of neglected, physically abused, and sexually abused preschoolers. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 781–796.

  • Toth, S. L., Cicchetti, D., Macfie, J., Maughan, A., & VanMeenen, K. (2000). Narrative representations of caregiver and self in maltreated preschoolers. Attachment and Human Development, 2, 271–305.

  • Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1995). Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the Adult Attachment Interview. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 387–403.

  • Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Juffer, F. (2005). Adoption is a successful natural intervention enhancing adopted children’s IQ and school performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 326–330.

  • Verhulst, F. C., & Versluis-den Bieman, H. (1990a). Behavioral/emotional problems in adopted adolescents. In K. Hurrelmann, & F. Losel (Eds.), Health hazards in adolescence (pp. 321–337). Oxford, England: Walter De Gruyter.

  • Verhulst, F. C., Althaus, M., Versluis-den Bieman, H. J. (1992). Damaging backgrounds: Later adjustment of international adoptees. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(3), 518–524.

  • Verhulst, F. C., Versluis-den Bieman, H., van der Ende, J., & Berden, G. F. (1990b). Problem behavior in international adoptees: III. Diagnosis of child psychiatric disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(3), 420–428.

  • Waldinger, R. J., Toth, S. L., & Gerber, A. (2001). Maltreatment and internal representations of relationships: Core relationships themes in the narratives of abused and neglected preschoolers. Social Development, 10(1), 41–58.

  • Warren, S. L. (2003a). Narratives in risk and clinical populations. In R. N. Emde, D. P. Wolf, & D. Oppenheim (Eds.), Revealing the inner worlds of young children: The MacArthur Story Stem Battery andparent-child narratives (pp. 222–239). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Warren, S. L. (2003b). Narrative Emotion Coding System (NEC). In R. N. Emde, D. P. Wolf, & D. Oppenheim (Eds.), Revealing the inner worlds of young children: The MacArthur Story Stem Battery andparent-child narratives (pp. 92–105). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Warren, S. L., Emde, R. N., & Sroufe, L. A. (2000). Internal representations: Predicting anxiety from children’s play narratives. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 100–107.

  • Warren, S. L., Oppenheim, D., & Emde, R. N. (1996). Can emotions and themes in children’s play predict behavior problems? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 1331–1337.

  • Waters, H. S., Rodrigues, L. M., & Ridgeway, D. (1998). Cognitive underpinnings of narrative attachment assessment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 211–234.

  • Wismer Fries, A. B., & Pollak, S. D. (2004). Emotion understanding in post-institutionalized Eastern European children. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 355–369.

  • Zahn-Waxler, C., Cole, P. M., Richardson, D. T., Friedman, R. J., Michel, M. K., & Belouad, F. (1994). Social problem solving in disruptive preschool children: reactions to hypothetical situations of conflict and distress. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 40, 98–119.

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fülöp, Márta

Chair of the Editorial Board:
Molnár, Márk

          Area Editors

  • Bereczkei Tamás (Evolutionary psychology)
  • Demetrovics Zsolt (Clinical psychology)
  • Egyed Katalin (Developmental psychology)
  • Hámori Eszter (Clinical child psychology)
  • Molnárné Kovács Judit (Social psychology)
  • Rózsa Sándor (Personality psychology and psychometrics)
  • Nguyen Luu Lan Anh (Cross-cultural psychology)
  • Pléh Csaba (Book Review)
  • Sass Judit (Industrial and organizational psychology)
  • Szabó Éva (Educational psychology)
  • Urbán Róbert (Health psychology)
  • Csákvári Judit (Psychology of special education)
  • Faragó Klára (Organizational psychology)
  • Kéri Szabolcs (Experimental and Neuropsychology)

 

        Editorial Board

  • Császár Noémi
  • Csépe Valéria
  • Dúll Andrea
  • Ehmann Bea
  • Erős Ferenc
  • Gervai Judit
  • Kiss Enikő Csilla
  • Kiss Paszkál
  • Mészáros Judit
  • Németh Dezső
  • Oláh Attila
  • Péley Bernadette
  • Perczel-Forintos Dóra
  • Révész György
  • Winkler István
  • Molnár Márk
  • Fülöp Márta

 

Secretary of the editorial board: 

  •  Saád Judit

 

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
ELTE PPK Pszichológiai Intézet
Address: H-1064 Budapest, Izabella u. 46.
E-mail: pszichoszemle@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • PsycINFO
  • Scopus

2020  
Scimago
H-index
7
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,142
Scimago
Quartile Score
Psychology (miscellaneous) Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
17/111=0,2
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
General Psychology 199/203 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,079
Scopus
Cites
53
Scopus
Documents
24
Days from submission to acceptance 116
Days from acceptance to publication 225
Acceptance
Rate
81%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
6
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,139
Scimago
Quartile Score
Psychology (miscellaneous) Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
24/103=0,2
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
General Psychology 192/204 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,113
Scopus
Cites
35
Scopus
Documents
14
Acceptance
Rate
58%

 

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Online subsscription: 152 EUR / 216 USD
Print + online subscription: 184 EUR / 244 USD
Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
Language Hungarian
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1928
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 76
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Pszichológiai Társaság 
Founder's
Address
H-1075 Budapest, Hungary Kazinczy u. 23-27. I/116. 
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0025-0279 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2799 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Feb 2021 19 1 2
Mar 2021 8 0 0
Apr 2021 11 1 0
May 2021 15 0 0
Jun 2021 2 0 0
Jul 2021 4 0 0
Aug 2021 0 0 0