Authors:
Katalin Balázs Debreceni Egyetem, Pszichológiai Intézet, Szociál-és Munkapszichológiai Tanszék

Search for other papers by Katalin Balázs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Panna Bakó Coloplast (a tanulmány megírásakor egyetemi hallgató, Debreceni Egyetem, Pszichológiai Intézet)

Search for other papers by Panna Bakó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Réka Gerhát Debreceni Egyetem, Pszichológiai Intézet

Search for other papers by Réka Gerhát in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Jelen tanulmány célja a közgazdaságtan és a fogyasztói magatartás vizsgálatában népszerű konstruktum, a meggyőzési tudatosság bemutatása a pszichológiai alkalmazás ösztönzése érdekében. A komplex konstruktum definiálása mellett vázoljuk a pszichológiai meggyőzési modelleket kiegészítő meggyőzési tudatosság modellt (Friestad és Wright, 1994). A tanulmányban a meggyőzési tudatosság fejlődésére, a különböző személyiségjellemzőkkel való kapcsolatára, a fejleszthetőségére és a mérési lehetőségeire is kitérünk. A meggyőzési tudatosság figyelembevétele a pszichológiai vizsgálatok során számos lehetőséget tartogat, hasznosságát empirikus kutatások összefoglalásával is demonstráljuk.

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179211.

  • Armstrong, G. A., & Brucks, M. (1988). Dealing with children's advertising: Public policy issues and alternatives. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 7, 98113.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balázs K. , & Barkó M. (2016). Művészi reklámok dimenzióinak és hatásosságának vizsgálata. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 71(2), 285312.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77, 281311.

  • Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 282316) NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bearden, W. O., Hardesty, D. M, & Carlson, J. P. (2007). Persuasion knowledge and consumer reactions to pricing tactics. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 199210.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bearden, W. O., Hardesty, D. M., & Rose, R. L. (2001). Consumer self-confidence: Refinements in conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 121134.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernáth Á. , Balázs K., & Jónás P. (2012). A mentalizációs képesség hatása a kreatív reklámok értékelésére. Alkalmazott Pszichológia, 2, 519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 165175.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (2009). Deception in the marketplace. New York: Routledge.

  • Brinol, P., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2015). Naïve theories about persuasion: Implications for information processing and consumer attitude change. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 85106.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116131.

  • Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 225254. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0403_02

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumer’s use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 6983.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2008). I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it: The use of the persuasion knowledge model in consumer research. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 549575). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carpenter, S. M., & Yoon, C. (2017). Ageing and consumer behavior: Challenges and opportunities. In C. V. Jansson-Boyd, & M. J. Zawisza (Eds), Routledge international handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 486501). Oxon and New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds), Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control (pp. 212252). New York: Guilford.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard, J. Shen (Eds), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 220236). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corbin, S. K.T., Jones, R. T., & Schulman, R. S. (1993). Drug refusal behavior: the relative efficacy of skill-based and information-based treatment. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 18, 769784.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dillard, J. P., & Shen, J. (Eds) (2013). The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Donohue, T. R., Henke, L. L., & Donohue, W. A. (1980). Do kids know what TV commercials intend? Journal of Advertising Research, 20, 5156.

  • Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 16871688.

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.

  • Eaton, A. A., Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Ananad, S. (2009). Social power and attitude strength over the life course. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(12), 16461660. doi: 10.1177/0146167209349114

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Faragó K. , Kiss O. E., & Fekete S. R. (2014). Az önszabályozó fókusz önbevallásos mérőeszközeinek érvényességi vizsgálata. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 69, 363395.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feiler, D. C., Tost, L. P., & Grant A. M. (2012). Mixed reasons, missed givings: The costs of blending egoistic and altruistic reasons in donation requests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 13221328.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 131.

  • Ham, C.-D., Nelson, M. R., & Das, S. (2015). How to measure persuasion knowledge? International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 1753.

  • Hardesty, D. M., Bearden, W. O., & Carlson, J. P. (2007). Persuasion knowledge and consumer reactions to pricing tactics. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 199210.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hess, T. M., Quenn T. L., & Ennis, G. E. (2013). Age and self-relevance effects on information search during decision making. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 703711.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American psychologist, 52(12), 12801300.

  • Jacoby, J., Johar, G. B., & Morrin, M. (1998). Consumer behaviour: A quadrennium. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 319344.

  • Jansen, L., Fennis, B. M., & Pruyn (2010). Forewarned is forearmed: Conserving self-control strength to resist social influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 911921.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • John, D. R. (1999). Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 183213.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 573582.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2009). Taking the target’s perspective: The Persuasion Knowledge Model. In M. Wanke (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 297316). New York: Psychology Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirmani, A., & Zhu, R. J. (2007). Vigilant Against Manipulation: The effect of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 688701.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kohler, J. W. (1972). Effects on audience opinion of one-sided and two-sided speech supporting and opposing a proposition. In T. D. Biesecker & D. W. Parson (Eds), The process of social influence (pp. 351369). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leekam, S. R. (1991). Jokes and lies: Children’s understanding of intentional falsehood. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 159174). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenzon, K., & C.A. Russell. 2012. From apathy to ambivalence: How is persuasion knowledge reflected in consumers comments about in game advertising? Journal of Marketing Communications 18(1), 5567.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McAllister, A. R., & Cornwell, T. B. (2009). Preschool children persuasion knowledge: The contribution of ToM, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 28, 175185.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore, E. S., & Lutz, R. J. (2000). Children, advertising, and product experiences: A multimethod inquiry. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 3148.

  • Moses, L. J., & Baldwin, D. A. (2005). What can the study of cognitive development reveal about children's ability to appreciate and cope with advertising? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(2), 186201.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Nemzeti Fejlesztési Minisztérium (2016). A “Fogyasztói tudatosságra nevelő iskola” pályázati felhívás. Letöltve: http://www.kormany.hu/download/7/6c/c0000/Fogyaszt%C3%B3i%20tudatoss% C3%A1gra%20nevel%C5%91%20iskola%20p%C3%A1ly%C3%A1zat.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nemzeti Fogyasztóvédelmi Hatóság (2015). Összefoglaló jelentés 2015. Letöltve: http://fogyasztovedelem. kormany.hu/sites/default/files/Eves_jelentes_2015.pdf

  • Nelson, M. R., Keum, H., & Yaros, R. A. (2004). Advertainment or adcreep? Game players’ attitudes toward advertising and product placements in computer games. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(1), 321.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159186.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Keefe, D. J. (2016). Persuasion: Theory and research. Los Angeles: Sage.

  • Perloff, R. M. (2010). The dynamics of persuasion. Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. New York: Routledge.

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 6981.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123205). New York: Academic Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847855.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 4172). New York: Guilford.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609647.

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a ToM? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515526.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ringold, D. J. (2005). Vulnerability in the marketplace: Concepts, caveats, and possible solutions. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 202214.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rucker, D. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2012). Metacognitive theory in consumer research. In P. Brinol, & K. G. DeMarree (Eds), Social metacognition (pp. 303– 321). New York: Psychology Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Samson, D., & Apperly, I. A. (2010). There is more to mind reading than having ToM concepts: New directions in ToM research. Infant and Child Development, 19, 443454.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwartz, B. (2011). Practical wisdom and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 323.

  • Sears, D. O. (1981). Life stage effects on attitude change, especially among the elderly. In S. B. Kiesler, J. N. Morgan, & V. K. Oppenheimer (Eds), Aging: Social change (pp. 183204). New York: Academic Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sher, P. J., & Lee, S-H. (2009). Consumer skepticism and online reviews: An Elaboration Likelihood Model perspective. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(1), 137144.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, G. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgementinvolvement approach. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simonson, I., Carmon, Z., Dhar, R., Drolet, A., & Nowlis, S. M. (2001). Consumer research: In search of identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 249275.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Síklaki I. (1994). A meggyőzés pszichológiája. Budapest: Scientia Humana.

  • Szabó E. , & Bereczkei T. (2015). Elmeolvasás és machiavellizmus: A manipuláció szituatív feltérképezése. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 70(1), 3753.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Valant, J. (2015). Consumer protection in the EU: Policy overview. European Parliamentary Research Service. Letöltve: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/565904/ EPRS_IDA(2015)565904_EN.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Visser, P. S., & Krosnick, J. A. (1998). Development of attitude strength over the life cycle: Surge and decline. Journal of Personality and Social Cognition, 75(6), 13891410.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vogel, T., Kutzner, F., Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (2010). Exploiting attractiveness in persuasion: Senders’ implicit theories about receivers’ processing motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 830842.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ward, S., & Wackman, D. (1973). Children’s information processing of television advertising, In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for mass communication research, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, P., Friestad, M., & Boush, D. M. (2005). The development of marketplace persuasion knowledge in children, adolescents, and young adults. American Marketing Association, 24(2), 222233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wynn, S. R., Schulenberg, J., Maggs, J. L., & Zucker, R. A. (2000). Preventing alcohol missuse: The impact of refusal skills and norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 3647.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zentai I. (1998). A meggyőzés útjai. A mindennapi élet meggyőzéspszichológiája. Budapest: Typotex Kiadó.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fülöp, Márta

Chair of the Editorial Board:
Molnár Márk, HUN-REN TTK, Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet, Budapest

          Area Editors

  • Bereczkei Tamás, PTE (Evolutionary psychology)
  • Bolla Veronika, ELTE BGGY (Psychology of special education)
  • Demetrovics Zsolt, ELTE PPK (Clinical psychology)
  • Faragó Klára, ELTE (Organizational psychology)
  • Hámori Eszter, PPKE (Clinical child psychology)
  • Kéri Szabolcs, SZTE (Experimental and Neuropsychology)
  • Kovács Kristóf, ELTE (Cognitive psychology)
  • Molnárné Kovács Judit, DTE (Social psychology)
  • Nagy Tamás, ELTE PPK (Health psychology, psychometry)
  • Nguyen Luu Lan Anh, ELTE PPK (Cross-cultural psychology)
  • Pohárnok Melinda, PTE (Developmental psychology)
  • Rózsa Sándor, KRE (Personality psychology and psychometrics)
  • Sass Judit, BCE (Industrial and organizational psychology)
  • Szabó Éva, SZTE (Educational psychology)
  • Szokolszky Ágnes, SZTE (Book review)

 

        Editorial Board

  • Csabai Márta, Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, Budapest

  • Császár Noémi, Pszichoszomatikus Ambulancia, Budapest

  • Csépe Valéria, HUN-REN TTK, Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet, Budapest

  • Czigler István, HUN-REN TTK, Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet, Budapest

  • Dúll Andrea, ELTE PPK, Budapest
  • Ehmann Bea, HUN-REN TTK, Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet, Budapest
  • Gervai Judit, HUN-REN TTK, Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet, Budapest
  • Kiss Enikő Csilla, Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, Budapest
  • Kiss Paszkál, Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, Budapest
  • Lábadi Beátrix, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pécs
  • Nagybányai-Nagy Olivér, Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, Budapest
  • Péley Bernadette, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pécs
  • Perczel-Forintos Dóra, Semmelweis Egyetem, Budapest
  • Polonyi Tünde, Debreceni Egyetem
  • Révész György,  Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pécs
  • Winkler István, HUN-REN TTK, Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet, Budapest

 

Secretary of the editorial board: 

  •  Saád Judit, HUN-REN TTK, Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet, Budapest

 

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
ELTE PPK Pszichológiai Intézet
Address: H-1064 Budapest, Izabella u. 46.
E-mail: pszichoszemle@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • PsycINFO
  • Scopus
  • CABELLS Journalytics

2023  
Scopus  
CiteScore 0.4
CiteScore rank Q4 (General Psychology)
SNIP 0.149
Scimago  
SJR index 0.126
SJR Q rank Q4

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 184 EUR / 220 USD
Print + online subscription: 224 EUR / 252 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle
Language Hungarian
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1928
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Pszichológiai Társaság 
Founder's
Address
H-1075 Budapest, Hungary Kazinczy u. 23-27. I/116. 
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0025-0279 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2799 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Sep 2024 15 1 1
Oct 2024 65 0 0
Nov 2024 130 1 1
Dec 2024 195 1 1
Jan 2025 66 1 2
Feb 2025 41 0 0
Mar 2025 0 0 0