In a pot experiment the effect of bentonite and zeolite doses [0; 5; 10; 15 and 20 g·kg soil -1 ] was studied on some chemical properties and ten soil microbiological and enzymological properties of an acidic [pH(H 2 O) = 5.65] humic sandy soil [WRB: Lamellic Arenosol (Dystric)], as well as on the biomass of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.), as test plant. The pot experiment was set up in 2007 and 2008 at the Department of Agrochemistry and Soil Science of the Debrecen University in three replications. The average results of the two year experiment can be summarized as follows: The pH increased due to the effect of small and medium amendment doses. The bentonite treatments proved to be more effective than the zeolite doses. As the pH increased, the hydrolytic acidity – in case of the bentonite treatments significantly – decreased. Concerning the easily available nutrient content of soil, the small and medium amendment doses turned out to be effective. The large bentonite doses reduced the nitrate-N content, the easily available phosphorus and potassium contents of soil. Large dose zeolite treatments decreased the nitrate-N content, but increased both the phosphorus and potassium content of soil, in most cases significantly. Regarding the measured soil microbial parameters, the small and medium amendment doses were the most effective. The bentonite and zeolite treatments increased the biomass of perennial ryegrass, especially the small and medium doses of bentonite and the large dose of zeolite brought about significant increases. According to the statistical analyses moderate and close correlations were found between the parameters studied. In the bentonite treatments a close correlation was established between the aerobic cellulose decomposing bacteria and saccharase enzyme activity (r = 0.864) of soil. In the case of zeolite treatments, a close correlation was found between the number of nitrifying bacteria and microbial biomass C (r = 0.911) of soil.
Felföldy, L., 1987. Biological water qualification. In: Water Management Hydrobiology (In Hungarian) (4th ed.) Water Management Servicing Affiliated Company. Budapest.
Filep, Gy., 1995. Soil Analysis. (Lecture note) (In Hungarian) Debrecen University. Debrecen.
Gerei, L. (Ed.), 1970. Methods of Soil and Agrochemical Analysis. (In Hungarian) OMMI. Budapest.
Ghrair, A., Ingwersen, J. & Streck, T., 2008. Immobilization of heavy metals in soil using nanoparticles produced from zeolitic tuff. In: Book of Abstracts, Eurosoil 2008, Vienna, 25–29 August, 2008. (Eds.: Blum, W. E. H., Gerzabek, M. H. & Vodrazka, M. ) 211–212. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU). Vienna.
Henzsel, I., 2008. Soil conservation in sandy soil. (In Hungarian) In: Talajvédelem (Különszám). Talajtani Vándorgyűlés, Nyíregyháza, május 28–29. 89–94. Talajvédelmi Alapítvány–Bessenyei György Könyvkiadó.
Huzsvai, L., 2004. Biometric methods in SPSS. SPSS applications. (In Hungarian) (Manuscript. 75–77. Debrecen University, Debrecen.
Jenkinson, D. S. & Powlson, D. S., 1976. The effect of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27. (8) 209–213.
Kátai, J. et al., 2007. The effect of bentonite on specific soil parameters and microbial characteristics of the carbon cycle. In: Proc. Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments. 247–254. Debrecen University. Debrecen.
Lazányi, J., 2003. The importance of bentonite tuff in the amelioration of sandy soils. (In Hungarian) In: Conference on Agro-economy, Rural Development and Agro-informatics at the Millennium, Debrecen 1–2 April, 2003. 4–8. Debrecen University, Centre for Agricultural Sciences. Debrecen.
Lazányi, J., 2005. Effects of bentonite on the water budget of sandy soil. In: Technologii de Cultura Pentru Grau Si Porumb Sympozion International, 7–8 iulie Oradea-Romania. 293–300. University of Oradea Publishing House.
Mátyás, E., 1979. Geological characterization of zeolites and rocks containing zeolite, with special regard to their properties important from the viewpoint of practical application. In: Proc. of User’s Symposium, Szerencs. 8–14. Geological Research Institute. Budapest.
Noble, A. D., Gillmann, G. P. & Ruaysoongnern, S., 2000. A cation exchange index for assessing degradation of acid soil by further acidification under permanent agriculture in the tropics. European Journal of Soil Science. 51. 233–243.
Pártay, G., Rajkainé Végh, K. & Lukács, A., 2006. Potassium migration in root medium treated with potassium feldspar. (In Hungarian) Agrokémia és Talajtan. 55. 395–414.
Pisarovic, A., Filipan, T. & Tisma, S., 2003. Application of zeolite based special substrates in agriculture-ecological and economical justification. Periodicum Biologorum. 105. (3) 287–293.
Pochon, J. & Tardieux, P., 1962. Techniques D’Analyse en Micobiologie du Sol. Collection „Technivues de Base”. Masson Co. Paris.
Savvas, D. et al., 2004. Yield and nutrient status in the root environment of tomatoes (Licopersicon esculentum) grown on chemically active and inactive inorganic substrates. Acta Horticulturae. 644. 377–383.
Shimmel, S. M. & Darley, W. M., 1985. Productivity and density of soil algae in an agricultural system. Ecology. 66. 1439–1447.
Szegi, J., 1979. Methods of Soil Microbiological Analysis. (In Hungarian) Mezőgazdasági Kiadó. Budapest.
Usman, A., Kuzyakov, Y. & Stahr, K., 2005. Effect of clay minerals on immobilization of heavy metals and microbial activity in a sewage sludge-contaminated soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 5. (4) 245–252.
Witkamp, M., 1966. Decomposition of leaf litter in relation to environment microflora and microbial respiration. Ecology. 47. 194–201.