Author:
Kaniye ebeku

Search for other papers by Kaniye ebeku in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

In a recent judgment in the Efstathiou case, the Assize Court of Nicosia, Cyprus, acquitted ten Policemen charged with criminal offences related to alleged beating in 2005 of two Cypriot students. That verdict led to spontaneous reactions across the country, with people publicly protesting against and criticizing the judiciary. Among those that made scathing public comments were the Attorney-General of Cyprus and senior Cypriot lawyers. In its judgment, the court had suggested that media comments about the case unduly interfered with the fair trial of the case and amounted to contempt of court. On the whole, this case raises the issues of independence of the judiciary, trial by media and fair trial. There are two opposing views on the propriety or otherwise of the media coverage of the case as well as on whether, and if so, to what extent, the judiciary can be properly criticized. Essentially, this article seeks to consider the issues of judicial independence, trial by media and fair trial as well as the closely associated issue of contempt of court arising from the Efstathiou case and in relation to the common-law rooted Cypriot legal system. It argues that the right to fair trial is an inseparable part of a democratic society and that while the right to freedom of expression is a fundamental human right and undoubtedly the bulwark of a democratic society, it is not realizable without an independent judiciary which is equally indispensable in a democratic society. Hence, there is a great need to recognize the limits of the right to freedom of expression in order to sustain the independence of the judiciary and ensure the right to a fair trial.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Éva Jakab

Co-Editor(s):
Viktor Lőrincz,
Fruzsina Orosz

Editor(s):
Samanatha Cheesman,
Zsuzsa Fejes,
Attila Kun,
Gábor Sulyok,
Márton Varju

Editorial Board

    1. Attila Badó
    1. Myátyás Bódig (Aberdeen)
    1. Zoltán Csehi
    1. Péter Cserne (Hull)
    1. Balázs Gellér
    1. András Jakab
    1. Miklós Király
    1. György Kiss
    1. Jan Kudrna (Praha)
    1. Herbert Küpper (Regensburg)
    1. Konrad Lachmayer (Durham)
    1. Andzrej Stanisław Mączyński (Kraków)
    1. Guido Pfeifer (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Miklós Szabó
    1. Zoltán Szente
    1. G.J.J. Heerma van Voss (Leiden)
    1. Bernd Waas (Frankfurt am Main)
    1. Fryderyk Zoll (Osnabrück)

Advisory Board

    1. Péter Erdő
    1. Gábor Hamza
    1. Attila Harmathy
    1. László Kecskés
    1. Tibor Király
    1. László Korinek
    1. László Sólyom
    1. Lajos Vékás
    1. Imre Vörös

Acta Juridica Hungarica
P.O. Box 25
HU–1250 Budapest,Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 355 7384
Fax. (36 1) 375 7858
E-mail: acta.juridica@tk.mta.hu

  Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Information technology and the Law
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Worldwide Political Science Abstractss
  • Translation Studies Abstracts
  • SCOPUS
  • Cabell's Directories
  • HeinOnline

 

Acta Juridica Hungarica
Language English
Size  
Year of
Foundation
1959
Publication
Programme
changed title
Volumes
per Year
 
Issues
per Year
 
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1216-2574 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2616 (Online)