View More View Less
  • 1 Károli G. University 1042 Budapest Viola u. 2-4 Hungary
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $576.00

After the fall of the communist regime, the Romanian State adopted a series of laws to redress the violations of property rights caused by that regime. Romania has been condemned in numerous restitution cases decided by the European Court of Human Rights, because the implementation of property restitution legislation has proceeded exceedingly slowly. This paper aims to investigate the main causes of this delay taking into consideration the new legislative framework of Property Restitution and the new judgements of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against Romania.

  • Bazyler, J.- Alford, R. (2006): Holocaust Restitution: Perspectives on the Litigation and Its Legac. New York, New York University Press, 304–310.

    Alford R. , '', in Holocaust Restitution: Perspectives on the Litigation and Its Legac , (2006 ) -.

  • Berechet, M. (2013): Caracterul concret şi efectiv al dreptului de proprietate asupra imobilelor preluate abuziv în perioada regimului comunist în România conferit prin măsurile de restituire instituite de Legea nr. 165/2013 [The practical and effective nature of the ownership right over real properties taken over in an abusive way during the communist regime in Romania, in virtue of the measures of restitution established by Law nr 165/2013], Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă nr. 3: 20–34; nr. 4: 171–189.

    Berechet M. , 'Caracterul concret şi efectiv al dreptului de proprietate asupra imobilelor preluate abuziv în perioada regimului comunist în România conferit prin măsurile de restituire instituite de Legea nr. 165/2013 ' (2013 ) 3 Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă : 20 -34.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Bîrsan, C. (2005): Convenţia europeană a drepturilor omului. Comentariu pe articole. [The European Convention on Human Rights. A commentary by articles.] Prof. dr. Corneliu Bîrsan. Bucureşti: All Beck, 2005–. 2 vol. (Comentarii Beck / Ed. C.H. Beck).

    Bîrsan C. , '', in Convenţia europeană a drepturilor omului. Comentariu pe articole , (2005 ) -.

  • Bîrsan, C. (2006): Conventia europeană a drepturilor omului. [The European Convention on Human Rights.] Corneliu Bîrsan, Marius Eftimie. Bucuresti: Editura Hamangiu, 172.

    Bîrsan C. , '', in Corneliu Bîrsan, Marius Eftimie , (2006 ) -.

  • Bîrsan, C. (2007): La protection du droit de propriete: developpements récents de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, în Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber, Human Rights-Strasbourg Views, Droits de l’homme-Regards de Strasbourg, Kehl, N. P. Engel Publisher, 5–19.

    Bîrsan C. , '', in Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber, Human Rights-Strasbourg Views, Droits de l’homme-Regards de Strasbourg , (2007 ) -.

  • Cardei, M. (2012): Aspects regarding the necessity of a unique digital cadastral plan for a territorial administrative unit, Geographia Napocensis 6 (2): 145–154.

    Cardei M. , 'Aspects regarding the necessity of a unique digital cadastral plan for a territorial administrative unit ' (2012 ) 6 Geographia Napocensis : 145 -154.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • CEDH, Străin et autres c. Roumanie, Recueil 2005-VII.

  • CEDH, Brumărescu c. Roumanie [GC], no 28342/95, § 70, CEDH 1999VII.

  • CEDH, Davidescu c. Roumanie, no 2252/02, § 47, 16 novembre 2006.

  • CEDH, Kopecky c. Slovaquie, Recueil 2004-IX.

  • CEDH, Mărăcineanu c. Roumanie, no 35591/03, § 17, 9 février 2010.

  • CEDH, Păduraru c. Roumanie, Recueil 2005-XII.

  • CEDH, Popescu et Dimeca c. Roumanie, no 17799/03, §§ 22 à 24, 9 décembre 2008.

  • CEDH, Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. et autres c. Belgique, Série A, Recueil 1995-VII.

  • Dumitru, C. (2013): O treime din terenuri au fost inventariate pentru retrocedare, Monitorul de Vrancea (11 December 2013), available at <http://www.monitorulvn.ro/articole/o-treime-dinterenuri-au-fost-inventariate-pentru-retrocedare_2_155760.html>.

    Dumitru C. , '', in Monitorul de Vrancea , (2013 ) -.

  • Ferentiu, G. C. (2007): Retrocedarea imobilelor preluate abuziv, Bucureşti, Editura Hamangiu.

    Ferentiu G. C. , '', in Retrocedarea imobilelor preluate abuziv , (2007 ) -.

  • Ferentiu, G. C. (2010): În legătură cu circulaţia juridică a terenurilor dobândite prin constituirea dreptului de proprietate în temeiul Legii nr. 18/1991, Dreptul 8: 134–138.

    Ferentiu G. C. , 'În legătură cu circulaţia juridică a terenurilor dobândite prin constituirea dreptului de proprietate în temeiul Legii nr. 18/1991 ' (2010 ) 8 Dreptul : 134 -138.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kis, A. (2010): România la Curtea europeană a Drepturilor Omului (2005–2008). [Romania at the European Court of Human Rights.] Kis Attila. Bucureşti: Wolters Kluwer.

    Kis A. , '', in România la Curtea europeană a Drepturilor Omului (2005–2008) , (2010 ) -.

  • Popescu, C. (2003): Hotărârile Curţii Europene a Drepturilor Omului pronunţate în cauzele împotriva României (1998–2002). [Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights adopted in cases against Romania, 1998–2002.] Bucureşti: All.

    Popescu C. , '', in Hotărârile Curţii Europene a Drepturilor Omului pronunţate în cauzele împotriva României (1998–2002) , (2003 ) -.

  • Popovici, A. (2011): Romania’s Property Restitution Reform. Policy Memo nr. 23, October 2011.

    Popovici A. , '', in Romania’s Property Restitution Reform , (2011 ) -.

  • Quesada, (2013): L’arret pilote Maria Atanasiu et autres contre Roumanie. In: In honorem Corneliu Bîrsan, coord. de A. Almăşan, Bucuresti, Ed. Hamangiu, 694–705.

    '', in In honorem Corneliu Bîrsan , (2013 ) -.

  • Rugină F. (2012): The pilot judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights: A case study on its efficiency. Unprinted thesis.

    Rugină F. , '', in The pilot judgment procedure of the European Court of Human Rights: A case study on its efficiency , (2012 ) -.

  • Scrieciu, F. (2000): Drept agrar si Drept funciar, Bucuresti, Editura Lumina, 45.

    Scrieciu F. , '', in Drept agrar si Drept funciar , (2000 ) -.

  • Strain and Others against Romania and Maria Atanasiu and Others against Romania (and 266 similar cases) group. General measures for the execution of the judgments of the European Court. Memorandum prepared by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, in close co-operation with the Registry of the European Court, H/Exec(2013)1 10 April 2013.

  • Stoian, M. A. (2009): The property right’s juridical means of defence and its implications in CEDO’s jurisprudence, in Analele Universitatii Titu Maiorescu Seria Drept, 134–155.

    Stoian M. A. , '', in The property right’s juridical means of defence and its implications in CEDO’s jurisprudence, in Analele Universitatii Titu Maiorescu Seria Drept , (2009 ) -.

  • Reinforcement of the independence of the European Court of Human Rights, 05 June 2014, Doc. 13524, Report by the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Parliamentary Assembly, Council of Europe, Rapporteur: Mr Boriss Cilevics, Latvia.