View More View Less
  • 1 Helsinki School of Economics, P.O. Box 1210, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

Privatisation to employees has been common in Estonia and in other transition economies, but some evidence suggests that employee ownership is declining. In this paper, I use the concept of “degeneration” from the literature of worker co-operatives to explain this decline. In the first part of the paper, I draw from the literature of complementarities in firm performance and apply the argument to the problem of stability of ownership structures. In the second part of the paper, I use evidence from management interviews and employee questionnaires taken at six Estonian enterprises with employee ownership. The evidence suggests that employee ownership is rapidly declining in Estonia. The main reason for the decline is that ownership is not extended to new employees.

  • Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. (1972): Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. American Economic Review, 62(4): 777795.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ben-Ner, A. (1984): On the Stability of Cooperative Type of Organization. Journal of Comparative Economics, 8: 247260.

  • Ben-Ner, A. (1988): Comparative Empirical Observations on Worker-Owned and Capitalist Firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6: 731.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ben-Ner, A. and Jones, D. C. (1995): Employee Participation, Ownership and Productivity: A Theoretical Framework. Industrial Relations, 34: 532555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blasi, J. R., Kroumova, M. and Kruse, D. (1997): Kremlin Capitalism: Privatizing the Russian Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cornforth, C. (1995): Patterns of Cooperative Management: Beyond the Degeneration Thesis. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 16: 487523.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Craig, B. and Pencavel, J. (1992): The Behavior of Worker Cooperatives: The Plywood Companies of the Pacific Northwest. The American Economic Review, 82: 10831105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Djankov, S. (1999): Ownership Structure and Enterprise Restructuring in Six Newly Independent States. Comparative Economic Studies, 41: 7595.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dow, G. K. and Putterman, L. (2000): Why Capital Suppliers (Usually) Hire Workers: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43: 319336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Earle, J. S. and Estrin, S. (1996): Employee Ownership in Transition. In: Frydman, R., Gray, C. and Rapaczynski, A. (eds): Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia, vol. 2. Budapest: CEU Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ellerman, D. P. (1990): The Democratic Worker-Owned Firm. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

  • Estrin, S. and Jones, D. C. (1992): The Viability of Employee Owned Firms: Evidence from France. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(2): 323338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Estrin, S. and Wright, M. (1999): Corporate Governance in the Former Soviet Union: An Overview. Journal of Comparative Economics, 27: 398421.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freeman, R. B. and Lazear, E. P. (1995): An Economic Analysis of Works Councils. In: Rogers, J. and Streeck, W. (eds): Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2750.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansmann, H. (1990): When Does Worker Ownership Work? ESOPs, Law Firms, Codetermination, and Economic Democracy. The Yale Law Journal, 99(8): 17491816.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, D. C. (1998): The Economic Effects of Privatization: Evidence from a Russian Panel. Comparative Economic Studies, 40: 75102.

  • Jones, D. C. and Mygind, N. (1999): The Nature and Determinants of Ownership Changes after Privatization: Evidence from Estonia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 27: 422441.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalmi, P. (2002): On the (In)stability of Employee Ownership: Estonian Evidence and Lessons for Transition Economies. Center for East European Studies, Copenhagen Business School, Ph.D. series 10.02.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kruse, D. L. and Blasi, J. R. (1997): Employee Ownership, Employee Attitudes, and Firm Performance: A Review of the Evidence. In: Lewin, D., Mitchell, D. J. B. and Zaidi, M. A. (eds): The Human Resource Management Handbook, Part I, Greenwich: JAI Press, 113151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lawler, E. E. (1986): High-Involvement Management: Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levine, D. I. (1995): Reinventing the Workplace: How Business and Employees Can Both Win. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.

  • Long, R. J. (1978): The Effects of Employee Ownership on Organisational Identification, Employee Job Attitudes, and Organisational Performance: A Tentative Framework and Empirical Findings. Human Relations, 31: 2948.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1995): Complementarities and Fit: Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in Modern Manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19: 179208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miyazaki, H. (1984): On Success and Dissolution of the Labor-managed Firm in the Capitalist Economy. Journal of Political Economy, 92: 909931.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mygind, N. (1992): The Choice of Ownership Structure. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 13: 359399.

  • Mygind, N. (2000): Privatisation, Governance and Restructuring of Enterprises in the Baltics. OECD, Centre for Co-operation with Non-members. Working paper CCNM/BALT, 6: 183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pérotin, V. A. (1997): What Makes Coops Work? Institutional Viability, Firm Creation, Survival and Closure Among Workers’ Cooperatives in France. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, Cornell University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A. and Morgan, S. (1991): Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects. Academy of Management Review, 16: 12144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosen, C., Klein, K. J. and Young, K. M. (1986): Employee Ownership in America: The Equity Solution. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

  • Russell, R. (1985): Sharing Ownership in the Workplace. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  • Russell, R. and Hanneman, R. (1992): Cooperatives and the Business Cycle: The Israeli Case. Journal of Comparative Economics, 16: 701715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Russell, R. and Hanneman, R. (1994): The Use of Hired Labor in Israeli Worker Cooperatives, 1933–1989. Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms, 5:2351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, S. C. (2001): Blooming Together or Wilting Alone? Network Externalities and the Mondragon and La Lega Cooperative Networks. Discussion Paper Nr. 2001/27, WIDER, Helsinki: United Nations University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stryjan, Y. (1994): Understanding Cooperatives: The Reproduction Perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 65: 5980.

  • Uvalic, M. and Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (eds) (1997): Privatization Surprises in Transition Economies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Weitzman, M. (1993): How not to Privatize. In: Baldassari, M., Paganetto, L. and Phelps, E. S. (eds): Privatization Processes in Eastern Europe: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Results, pp. 249269.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weitzman, M. and Kruse, D. (1990): Profit Sharing and Productivity. In: Blinder, A. S. (ed.): Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 95141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woodward, R. (1998): Various Forms of Employee Participation in Polish Employee-Owned Companies: A Statistical Analysis. Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms, 6: 5788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

The description of the refereeing procedure is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

  • Ádám Török (Chairman) / University of Pannonia; Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Edina Berlinger / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Finance
  • Péter Halmai / Budapest University of Technology and Economics; National University of Public Service
  • István Kónya / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies, University of Pécs
  • János Köllő / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies
  • István Magas / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of World Economy; University of Physical Education, Department. of Sports and Decision Sciences
 

Advisory Board

  • Ǻslund, Anders, Institute of International Economics, Washington (USA)
  • Kolodko, Grzegorz, Kozminski University, Warsaw (Poland)
  • Mau, Vladimir, Academy of National Economy (Russia)
  • Messerlin, Patrick A, Groupe d’Economie Mondiale (France)
  • Saul Estrin, London School of Economics (UK)
  • Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, Europa Universität Viadrina (Germany)

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Index Copernicus

 

2020  
Total Cites 275
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,875
Rank by Economics 325/377 (Q4)
Impact Factor  
Impact Factor 0,534
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year 0,500
Impact Factor
Journal  0,38
Citation Indicator  
Rank by Journal  Economics 347/549 (Q3)
Citation Indicator   
Citable 37
Items
Total 37
Articles
Total 0
Reviews
Scimago 13
H-index
Scimago 0,292
Journal Rank
Scimago Economics and Econometrics Q3
Quartile Score  
Scopus 225/166=1,4
Scite Score  
Scopus Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank  
Scopus 0,668
SNIP  
Days from  289
sumbission  
to acceptance  
Days from  447
acceptance  
to publication  

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
212
Impact Factor 0,914
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,728
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,650
Immediacy
Index
0,156
Citable
Items
45
Total
Articles
45
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
3,9
Citing
Half-Life
9,5
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00015
Article Influence
Score
0,052
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,01891
Average
IF
Percentile
28,437
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,439
Scopus
Scite Score
214/165=1,3
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,989

 

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2021 Online subsscription: 588 EUR / 732 USD
Print + online subscription: 688 EUR / 860 USD
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 600 EUR / 750 USD
Print + online subscription: 704 EUR / 880 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 71
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)