View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Regional and Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Szeged H-6722 Szeged, Honvéd tér 6, Hungary
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

The notion of competitiveness figures nowadays frequently and centrally both in economic policy and in regional development. Current economic development programmes, in short, have been directly responsible for the increasing attention devoted to analyses of regional competitiveness. At the same time, there is a growing consensus that a single notion of competitiveness can be found to describe processes of the globalising economy for companies (microlevel), industrial sectors and regions (mesolevel) as well as for national economies (macrolevel). The standard (common) concept of competitiveness has been partly developed in order to serve as a widely accepted theoretical definition, which can be measured and also be used by economic development policies. Competitiveness is intimately bound up with successful economic development. This study reviews the conceptual background and some special aspects of competitiveness and also looks more closely at one of the basic models of enhancing regional competitiveness. First, some aspects of the standard notion of competitiveness are discussed. Then some key indicators of the competitiveness of Hungarian regions will be investigated. I shall end by introducing the so-called pyramid model, which has been designed to measure and improve regional competitiveness.

  • Lengyel, I. (1998): Features of Dwelling Construction in Hungary. In: Barlow, M., Lengyel, I. and Welch, R. (eds): Local Development and Public Administration in Transition. Szeged: JATEPress, 182-191.

    Features of Dwelling Construction in Hungary , () 182 -191.

  • Lengyel, I. (2000): A regionális versenyképességröl (Regional Competitiveness). Közgazdasági Szemle, 47(12): 962-987.

    'A regionális versenyképességröl (Regional Competitiveness) ' () 47 Közgazdasági Szemle : 962.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Lengyel, I. (2002): The Competitiveness of Hungarian Regions. In: Varga, A., and Szerb, L. (eds): Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Regions and Economic Development: International Experiences and Hungarian Challenges. Pécs: University of Pécs Press, 235-246.

    The Competitiveness of Hungarian Regions , () 235 -246.

  • Malecki, E. J. (1997): Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Competitiveness. Edinburgh: Longman.

    Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Competitiveness. , ().

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Malecki, E. J. (1999): Knowledge and Regional Competitiveness. paper prepared for presentation at the International Symposium "Knowledge, Education and Space", Heidelberg, Germany, September 1999, 36 pp.

    Knowledge and Regional Competitiveness , () 36.

  • Maskell, P., Eskelinen, H., Hannibalsson, I., Malmberg, A. and Vatne, E. (1998): Competitiveness, Locational Learnings and Regional Development: Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies. London: Routledge.

    Competitiveness, Locational Learnings and Regional Development: Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies. , ().

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Myant, M. (ed.) (1999): Industrial Competitiveness in East-Central Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Industrial Competitiveness in East-Central Europe. , ().

  • OECD (1997): Regional Competitiveness and Skills. Paris: OECD.

    Regional Competitiveness and Skills. , ().

  • Porter, M. E. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

    The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , ().

  • Porter, M. E. (1998): On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    On Competition. , ().

  • Porter, M. E. (2000): Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quaterly, 14(1): 15-34.

    'Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy ' () 14 Economic Development Quaterly : 15.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Rechnitzer, J. (2000): The Features of the Transition of Hungary's Regional System. Centre for Regional Studies, Pécs, Hungary, Discussion Papers, No. 32.

  • Török, á. (1999b): A versenyképesség és a technológiamenedzsment (Competitiveness and Technology Management). In: Inzelt, A. (ed.): Bevezetés az innováció-menedzsmentbe (An Introduction to Innovation Management). Budapest: Möszaki Könyvkiadó, 74-95.

    A versenyképesség és a technológiamenedzsment (Competitiveness and Technology Management) , () 74 -95.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • WB (1999): Competitiveness Indicators. The World Bank Group. http://fpsi.worldbank.org/fpsiweb/frame/compet.html

  • WEF (2001): The Global Competitiveness Report 2001-2002. World Economic Forum, Geneva.

  • Wren, C. (2001): The Industrial Policy of Competitiveness: A Review of Recent Developments in the UK. Regional Studies 9: 847-860.

    'The Industrial Policy of Competitiveness: A Review of Recent Developments in the UK ' () 9 Regional Studies : 847.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hatzichronoglou, T. (1996): Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators. OECD STI Working Papers, 1996/5, Paris.

    Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators. , ().

  • IMD (2001): The World Competitiveness Yearbook. Lausanne: International Institute for Management Development.

    The World Competitiveness Yearbook. , ().

  • Porter, M. E. (2001): Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of U. S. Competitiveness. Council of Competitiveness, Washington.

    Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of U. S. Competitiveness. , ().

  • Török, á. (1999a): Verseny a versenyképességért (Competition for Competitiveness). Integrációs Stratégiai Munkacsoport, Budapest.

    Verseny a versenyképességért , ().

  • HCSO (1999): Regional Statistical Yearbook. Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Budapest.

    Regional Statistical Yearbook. , ().

  • HCSO (2001): Regional Statistical Yearbook. Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Budapest.

    Regional Statistical Yearbook. , ().

  • DTI (2002): Regional Competitiveness Indicators. Department of Trade and Industry, London. www.dti.gov.uk/sd/rci

  • EC (1999a): Sixth Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation and Development of Regions in the European Union. European Commission, Luxembourg.

  • EC (1999b): Commission Communication Concerning the Structural Funds and their Coordination with the Cohesion Fund. Guidelines for Programmes in the Period 2000 to 2006. 1999/C 267/02.

  • EC (2001a): Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. European Commission, Brussels.

  • EC (2001b): European Competitiveness Report 2001. European Commission, Brussels, SEC (2001) 1715.

  • EC (2002): European Competitiveness Report 2002. European Commission, Brussels, SEC (2002) 528.

  • Armstrong, H. and Taylor, J. (2000): Regional Economics and Policy. (3rd ed.) Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Regional Economics and Policy. , ().

  • Begg, I. (1999): Cities and Competitiveness. Urban Studies, 5-6: 795-809.

    'Cities and Competitiveness ' () 5-6 Urban Studies : 795 -809.

  • Dicken, P. (1998): Global Shift. Transforming the World Economy (3rd ed). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Global Shift. Transforming the World Economy , ().

  • Edmonds, T. (2000): Regional Competitiveness & the Role of the Knowledge Economy. House of Commons Library, Research paper 00/73, 56 pp.

  • Enyedi, Gy. (1996): Regionális folyamatok Magyarországon az átmenet idöszakában (Regional Processes in Hungary in the Period of Transition). Budapest: Hilscher R. Szociálpolitikai Egyesület.

    Regionális folyamatok Magyarországon az átmenet idöszakában , ().

  • Enyedi, Gy. (2000): Globalizáció és magyar területi fejlödés (Globalisation and Regional Development in Hungary). Tér és Társadalom, 14(1): 1-10.

    'Globalizáció és magyar területi fejlödés (Globalisation and Regional Development in Hungary) ' () 14 Tér és Társadalom .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Hall, R., Smith, A. and Tsoukalis, L. (eds) (2001): Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU Policies , ().

  • Jensen-Butler, C. N. (1996): Competition between Cities, Urban Performance and the Role of Urban Policy: A Theoretical Framework. In: Jensen-Butler, C. N., Shachar, A., and Van Weesep, J. (eds): European Cities in Competition. Avebury: Aldershot: 3-42.

    Competition between Cities, Urban Performance and the Role of Urban Policy: A Theoretical Framework , () 3 -42.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kitson, M. and Michie, J. (2000): The Political Economy of Competitiveness. London: Routledge.

    The Political Economy of Competitiveness. , ().

  • Kresl, P. K. and Singh, B. (1999): Competitiveness and Urban Economy: Twenty-four Large US Metropolitan Areas. Urban Studies, 5-6: 1017-1027.

    'Competitiveness and Urban Economy: Twenty-four Large US Metropolitan Areas ' () 5-6 Urban Studies : 1017.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Krugman, P. (1999): The Role of Geography in Development. International Regional Science Review, 22(2): 142-161.

    'The Role of Geography in Development ' () 22 International Regional Science Review : 142.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Krugman, P. (2000): Where in the World is the 'New Economic Geography'? In: Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P. and Gertler, M. S. (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49-60.

    Where in the World is the 'New Economic Geography' , () 49 -60.