Authors:
Szabolcs Szilárd Sebrek University of Pannonia

Search for other papers by Szabolcs Szilárd Sebrek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Betsabé Pérez Garrido
Search for other papers by Betsabé Pérez Garrido in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This paper seeks to illuminate empirically a class of drivers of firm performance hitherto neglected in the economic literature. To accomplish this objective, we distinguished three elements: sales volume, participation in technology alliancing, and successful patent issuing. Our findings suggest that competitive pressure posed by larger rivals in an industry affects sales performance negatively, but the possession of absorptive capacity can counter this deleterious effect. Findings regarding the effects caused by a product portfolio with high technological content are mixed. Depending on the performance measure applied, the results show evidence of adverse outcomes for sales, U-shaped effects for participation in technology alliancing and inverted U-shaped results for patenting. We obtained our raw data from the 2006 and 2008 PITEC database, which is the Spanish equivalent of the EU Community Innovation Survey. Our sample embraces more than 3000 firms.

  • Alcácer, J.Chung, W. (2007): Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers. Management Science, 53(5): 760776.

  • Almirall, E.Casadeus-Masanell, R. (2010): Open versus Closed Innovation: A Model of Discovery and Divergence. Academy of Management Review, 35(1): 2747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, P.Tushman, M.L. (1990): Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604633.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ansoff, H.I.Stewart, J.M. (1967): Strategies for a Technology-Based Business. Harvard Business Review, 45(6): 7183.

  • Arbussá, A.Coenders, G. (2007): Innovation Activities, Use of Appropriation Instruments and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from Spanish Firms. Research Policy, 36(10): 15451558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barge-Gil, A. (2010): Open, Semi-Open and Closed Innovators: Towards an Explanation of Degree of Openness. Industry and Innovation, 17(6): 577607.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnett, W.P.Sorenson, O. (2002): The Red Queen in Organizational Creation and Development. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2): 289325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barroso, A.Giarratana, M.S. (2013): Product Proliferation Strategies and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Product Space Complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12): 14351452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baum, J.A.C.Silverman, B.S. (2004): Picking Winners or Building Them? Alliance, Intellectual, and Human Capital as Selection Criteria in Venture Financing and Performance of Biotechnology Start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3): 411436.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carroll, G.R.Swaminathan, A. (2000): Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the US Brewing Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3): 715762.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chiaroni, D.Chiesa, V.Frattini, F. (2011): The Open Innovation Journey: How Firms Dynamically Implement the Emerging Innovation Management Paradigm. Technovation, 31(1): 3443.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen, W.Levinthal, D. (1989): Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99: 569596.

  • Cohen, W.Levinthal, D. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dobrev, S.Carroll, G.R. (2003): Size (and Competition) among Organizations: Modelling Scale-Based Selection among Automobile Producers in Four Major Countries, 1885–1981. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6): 541558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dobrev, S.Kim, T.Y.Carroll, G.R. (2002): The Evolution of Organizational Niches: U.S. Automobile Manufacturers, 1885–1981. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2): 233–264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dobson, A.J. (2002): An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. New York: Chapman & Hall.

  • Eggers, J.P. (2012): All Experience is not Created Equal: Learning, Adapting, and Focusing in Product Portfolio Management. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3): 315335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Escribano, A.Fosfuri, A.Tribo, J.A. (2009): Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Research Policy, 38(1): 96105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fabrizio, K.R. (2009): Absorptive Capacity and the Search for Innovation. Research Policy, 38(2): 255267.

  • Folta, T.B.Cooper, A.C.Baik, Y.S. (2006): Geographic Cluster and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2): 217242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gans, J.S.Stern, S. (2003): The Product Market and the Market for “Ideas”: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2): 333350.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garud, R.Kumaraswamy, A. (1993): Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystems Open Systems Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5): 351369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giarratana, M.S. (2004): The Birth of a New Industry: Entry by Start-ups and the Drivers of Firm Growth: The Case of Encryption Software. Research Policy, 33(5): 787806.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giarratana, M.S.Fosfuri, A. (2007): Product Strategies and Survival in Schumpeterian Environments: Evidence from the US Security Software Industry. Organization Studies, 28(6): 909929.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodman, L.A.Kruskal, W.H. (1954): Measures of Association for Cross Classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49: 732764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greene, W.H. (2008): Econometric Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  • Helfat, C.E. (1997): Know-How and Asset Complementarity and Dynamic Capability Accumulation: The Case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5): 339360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henderson, R.Cockburn, I. (1996): Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery. RAND Journal of Economics, 27(1): 3259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hosmer, D.W.Lemeshow, S. (1989): Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.

  • Jaffe, A.Trajtenberg, M.Henderson, R. (1993): Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, G.R.Hill, C.W.L. (1988): Transaction Cost Analysis of Strategy-Structure Choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 159172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, D.J.Kogut, B. (1996): Technological Platforms and Diversification. Organization Science, 17(3): 283301.

  • Klepper, S.Simons, K.L. (2000): Dominance by Birthright: Entry of Prior Radio Producers and Competitive Ramification in the U.S. Television Receiver Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11): 9971016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lancaster, K.M. (1990): The Economics of Product Variety. Marketing Science, 9(3): 189211.

  • Laursen, K.Salter, A. (2006): Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, S.Park, G.Yoon, B.Park, J. (2010): Open Innovation in SMEs — An Intermediated Network Model. Research Policy, 39(2): 290300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nelson, R.R.Winter, S. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Sakkab, N.Y. (2002): Connect — Develop Complements Research — Develop at P—G. Research-Technology Management, 45(8): 3845.

  • Santamaria, L.Nieto, M.J.Barge-Gil, A. (2009): Beyond Formal R&D: Taking Advantage of Other Sources of Innovation in Low- and Medium-Technology Industries. Research Policy, 38(3): 507517.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmalensee, R. (1978): Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2): 305327.

  • Sorenson, O. (2000): Letting the Market Work for You: An Evolutionary Perspective on Product Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5): 577592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Teece, D.J. (1986): Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy. Research Policy, 15(6): 285305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • The Economist (2011a): The Next Big Bet. 1 October 2011.

  • The Economist (2011b): Economies of Scale Made Steel. 12 November 2011.

  • van den Bosch, F.A.J.Volberda, H.W.de Boer, M. (1999): Co-Evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5): 551568.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zahra, S.A.George, G. (2002): Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Re-Conceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
The author instructions are available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

The description of the refereeing procedure is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

  • Ádám Török (Chairman) / University of Pannonia; Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Edina Berlinger / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Finance
  • Beáta Farkas / Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Szeged
  • Péter Halmai / Budapest University of Technology and Economics; National University of Public Service
  • István Kónya / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies, University of Pécs
  • János Köllő / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies
  • István Magas / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of World Economy; University of Physical Education, Department. of Sports and Decision Sciences
 

Advisory Board

  • Ǻslund, Anders, Institute of International Economics, Washington (USA)
  • Kolodko, Grzegorz, Kozminski University, Warsaw (Poland)
  • Mau, Vladimir, Academy of National Economy (Russia)
  • Messerlin, Patrick A, Groupe d’Economie Mondiale (France)
  • Saul Estrin, London School of Economics (UK)
  • Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, Europa Universität Viadrina (Germany)

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary
E-mail: vanyai.judit@krtk.hu  

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • Index Copernicus
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index

 

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
314
Journal Impact Factor 0.8
Rank by Impact Factor

Economics 334/380
TBA

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0.6
5 Year
Impact Factor
0.8
Journal Citation Indicator 0.29
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

Economics 421/581

 

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
18
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.23
Scimago Quartile Score

Economics and Econometrics Q3

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.1
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 521/705 (26th PCTL)
TBA
Scopus
SNIP
0.540

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
285
Journal Impact Factor 0,939
Rank by Impact Factor Economics 326/379
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,646
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,740
Journal Citation Indicator 0,34
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator Economics 389/570
Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
15
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,285
Scimago Quartile Score Economics and Econometrics (Q3)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,4
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 436/696 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,507

2020  
Total Cites 275
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,875
Rank by Economics 325/377 (Q4)
Impact Factor  
Impact Factor 0,534
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year 0,500
Impact Factor
Journal  0,38
Citation Indicator  
Rank by Journal  Economics 347/549 (Q3)
Citation Indicator   
Citable 37
Items
Total 37
Articles
Total 0
Reviews
Scimago 13
H-index
Scimago 0,292
Journal Rank
Scimago Economics and Econometrics Q3
Quartile Score  
Scopus 225/166=1,4
Scite Score  
Scopus Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank  
Scopus 0,668
SNIP  
Days from  289
submission  
to acceptance  
Days from  447
acceptance  
to publication  

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
212
Impact Factor 0,914
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,728
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,650
Immediacy
Index
0,156
Citable
Items
45
Total
Articles
45
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
3,9
Citing
Half-Life
9,5
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00015
Article Influence
Score
0,052
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,01891
Average
IF
Percentile
28,437
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,439
Scopus
Scite Score
214/165=1,3
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,989

 

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 620 EUR / 750 USD
Print + online subscription: 724 EUR / 880 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Dec 2023 56 1 2
Jan 2024 31 2 1
Feb 2024 38 0 0
Mar 2024 24 0 0
Apr 2024 5 0 0
May 2024 10 0 0
Jun 2024 6 2 2