View More View Less
  • 1 City College of Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, China
  • | 2 City College of Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, China
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

The 21st century is a knowledge economic era when a person who could master knowledge and technologies could master the competitive future. The knowledge and technology competition and the emergence of information technology and the Internet in the future have innovation strategies enter a new era. Knowledge management and share as well as innovation strategies of a business present the importance on the enhancement of competitive advantages. Effective knowledge management and innovation strategies become the key in the success.

Aiming at Kunshan German Industrial Park, the executives and employees in 6 of top 500 businesses are distributed 300 copies of questionnaires, among which 218 valid copies are retrieved, with the retrieval rate 73%. The research results show the significant correlations between 1. innovation strategies and competitive advantages, 2. knowledge management and innovative strategies, and 3. knowledge management and competitive advantages. It is expected to assist businesses in constructing knowledge management.

  • Aboelmaged, M.G. (2012). Harvesting organizational knowledge and innovation practices: An empirical examination of their effects on operations strategy. Business Process Management Journal, 18(5), 712734.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aboelmaged, M.G. (2012). Linking operations performance to knowledge management capability: The mediating role of innovation performance. Production Planning & Control (ahead-ofprint), 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Al-Adaileh, R.M. and Al-Atawi, M.S. (2011). Organizational culture impact on knowledge exchange: Saudi Telecom context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 212230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Analoui, B.D., Doloriert, C.H. and Sambrook, S. (2012). Leadership and knowledge management in UK ICT organisations. Journal of Management Development, 32(1), 417.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marking Science, (16), 7694.

  • Becan, J.E., Knight, D.K. and Flynn, P.M. (2012). Innovation adoption as facilitated by a changeoriented workplace. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 42(2), 179190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bolívar-Ramos, M.T., García-Morales, V.J. and García-Sánchez, E. (2012). Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 331357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Camelo-Ordaz, C., García-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E. and Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(07), 14421463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Camps, J. and Torres, F. (2011). Contingent reward leader behaviour: Where does it come from? Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28(3), 212230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chong, C.W., Teh, P.L. and Asmawi, A. (2012). Knowledge sharing practices in Malaysian MSC status companies. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 13(1), 15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cuieford, J.P. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, 4th Ed. NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • De Vries, R.E., Pathak, R.D. and Paquin, A.R. (2011). The paradox of power sharing: Participative charismatic leaders have subordinates with more instead of less need for leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(6), 779804.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DuBrin, A.J. (2012). Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills. South-Western Pub.

  • Feleagă, L., Feleagă, N., Dragomir, V. and Râbu, L. (2013). European evidence on intellectual capital: Linking methodologies with firm disclosures. Acta Oeconomica, 63(2), 139156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franke, F. and Felfe, J. (2012). Transfer of leadership skills. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(3), 138147.

  • George, G. and Bock, A.J. (2011). The Business Model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 88111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hsiao, H-C. and Chang, J.C. (2011). The role of organizational learning in transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 621631.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hung, R.Y.Y., Lien, B. Y-H., Yang, B., Wu, C-M. and Kuo, Y-M. (2011). Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. International Business Review, 20(2), 213225.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kerlinger, F.N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Orlando, FL.

  • Lai, Y-L. and Lin, F-J. (2012). The effects of knowledge management and technology innovation on new product development performance. An empirical study of Taiwanese machine tools industry. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 157164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loke, S.P., Downe, A.G., Sambasivan, M. and Khalid, K. (2012). A structural approach to integrating total quality management and knowledge management with supply chain learning. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(4), 776800.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • López-Nicolás, C. and Meroño-Cerdán, Á.L. (2011). Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 502509.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McIntyre, D. (2011). Optimizing knowledge in teams: The role of knowledge orientation, task, and fit. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 12(4).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mirkamali, S.M., Thani, F.N. and Alami, F. (2011). Examining the role of transformational leadership and job satisfaction in the organizational learning of an automotive manufacturing company. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 139148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nguyen, H.N. and Mohamed, S. (2011). Leadership behaviors, organizational culture and knowledge management practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Development, 30(2), 206221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randall, K.R., Resick, C.J. and DeChurch, L.A. (2011). Building team adaptive capacity: The roles of sensegiving and team composition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 525540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robbins, S.P. (2013). Organizational Behavior, 15th ed. Boston: Pearson.

  • Wang, Y.-L. and Ellinger, A.D. (2011). Organizational learning: Perception of external environment and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5/6), 512536.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zott, C., Amit, R. and Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 10191042.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

The description of the refereeing procedure is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

  • Ádám Török (Chairman) / University of Pannonia; Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Edina Berlinger / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Finance
  • Beáta Farkas / Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Szeged
  • Péter Halmai / Budapest University of Technology and Economics; National University of Public Service
  • István Kónya / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies, University of Pécs
  • János Köllő / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies
  • István Magas / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of World Economy; University of Physical Education, Department. of Sports and Decision Sciences
 

Advisory Board

  • Ǻslund, Anders, Institute of International Economics, Washington (USA)
  • Kolodko, Grzegorz, Kozminski University, Warsaw (Poland)
  • Mau, Vladimir, Academy of National Economy (Russia)
  • Messerlin, Patrick A, Groupe d’Economie Mondiale (France)
  • Saul Estrin, London School of Economics (UK)
  • Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, Europa Universität Viadrina (Germany)

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Index Copernicus

 

2020  
Total Cites 275
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,875
Rank by Economics 325/377 (Q4)
Impact Factor  
Impact Factor 0,534
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year 0,500
Impact Factor
Journal  0,38
Citation Indicator  
Rank by Journal  Economics 347/549 (Q3)
Citation Indicator   
Citable 37
Items
Total 37
Articles
Total 0
Reviews
Scimago 13
H-index
Scimago 0,292
Journal Rank
Scimago Economics and Econometrics Q3
Quartile Score  
Scopus 225/166=1,4
Scite Score  
Scopus Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank  
Scopus 0,668
SNIP  
Days from  289
submission  
to acceptance  
Days from  447
acceptance  
to publication  

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
212
Impact Factor 0,914
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,728
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,650
Immediacy
Index
0,156
Citable
Items
45
Total
Articles
45
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
3,9
Citing
Half-Life
9,5
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00015
Article Influence
Score
0,052
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,01891
Average
IF
Percentile
28,437
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,439
Scopus
Scite Score
214/165=1,3
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,989

 

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2021 Online subsscription: 588 EUR / 732 USD
Print + online subscription: 688 EUR / 860 USD
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 600 EUR / 750 USD
Print + online subscription: 704 EUR / 880 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 71
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)