In 1961, Staffan Linder attacked mainstream trade economics by diverging from the generally accepted factor endowments theory and focusing on alternative explanations of why countries trade with each other. He was among the first economists to recognise the growing importance of intraindustry trade and presented his hypothesis that the more similar the per capita income levels of countries, the more they tend to trade with each other. This observation has since become one of the main pillars of modern trade theory. The present paper assesses the empirical validity of the Linder hypothesis in the Visegrad countries. Using a variant of the gravity model, it finds that when controlling for other factors, the Visegrad countries tend to trade more with countries with similar per capita income levels than with significantly richer or poorer countries. This observation is consistent with the Linder hypothesis. OLS regressions, Tobit regressions, and robustness checks all support the hypothesis.
Aquino, A. (1978): Intra-Industry Trade and Inter-Industry Specialization as Concurrent Sources of International Trade in Manufactures. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 114(2): 275–296.
Bergstrand, J. H. (1990): The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade. Economic Journal, 100(403): 1216–1229.
Bojnec, S. – Ferto, I. – Jámbor, A. – Tóth, J. (2014): Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Agriculture in New EU Member States from Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Oeconomica, 64(2): 197–214.
Brülhart, M. (2009): An Account of Global Intra-Industry Trade 1962–2006. World Economy, 32(3): 401–459.
CEPII (2011): Geodist. Available Online: Http://Www.Cepii.Fr/CEPII/En/Bdd_Modele/Presen tation.Asp?Id=6.
Chow, Ch. (2002): Linder Hypothesis Revisited. Applied Economics Letters, 9(1): 601–605.
Chow, P. – Kellman, M. – Shachmurove, Y. (1999): A Test of the Linder Hypothesis in Pacific NIC Trade 1965–1990. Applied Economics, 31(2): 175–182.
Cernoša, S. (2007): Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade between the Former CEFTA Countries and the European Union. Managing Global Transitions, 5(2): 157–178.
Dudáš, T. (2004): Stav Politického Prostredia Ako Faktor Investicnej Atraktívnosti v Štátoch Strednej a Východnej Európy (Political Environment as a Factor of Investment Attractiveness in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe). Medzinárodné Vztahy, 2(2): 68–74.
Ferto, I. (2007): Intra-Industry Trade in Horizontally and Vertically Differentiated Agri-Food Products between Hungary and the EU. Acta Oeconomica, 57(2): 191–208.
Francois, J. F. – Kaplan, S. (1996): Aggregate Demand Shifts, Income Distribution, and the Linder Hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2): 244–250.
Grossman, G. M. – Rogoff, K. (1995): Handbook of International Economics. Volume 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Grubel, H. G. – Lloyd, P. J. (1971): The Empirical Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade. Economic Record, 47(4): 494–517.
Grubel, H. G. – Lloyd, P. J. (1975): Intra-Industry Trade. The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. London: Macmillan.
Gyorffy, D. (2009): Structural Change without Trust: Reform Cycles in Hungary and Slovakia. Acta Oeconomica, 59(2): 147–177.
Hallak, J. C. (2010): A Product-Quality View of the Linder Hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3): 453–466.
Hanink, D. M. (1988): An Extended Linder Model of International Trade. Economic Geography, 64(4): 322–334.
Hanink, D. M. (1990): Linder, Again. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 126(2): 257–267.
Hoftyzer, J. (1984): A Further Analysis of the Linder Trade Thesis. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 24(2): 57–70.
Jámbor, A. (2014): Country-Specific Determinants of Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Agri-Food Trade: The Case of the EU New Member States. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(3): 663–682.
Kawecka-Wyrzykowska, E. (2009): Evolving Pattern of Intra-Industry Trade Specialization of the New Member States of the EU: The Case of Automotive Industry. European Economy Economic Papers, 2009(364): 1–37.
Kennedy, T. E. – McHugh, R. (1980): An Intertemporal Test and Rejection of the Linder Hypothesis. Southern Economic Journal, 46(3): 898–903.
Lane, T. D. (1992): Transforming Poland’s Economy. Finance & Development, 29(2): 10–13.
Linder, S. (1961): An Essay on Trade and Transformation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Linnemann, H. – van Beers, C. (1988): Measures of Export-Import Similarity and the Linder Hypothesis Once Again. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 124(3): 445–457.
McPherson, M. A. – Redfearn, M. R. – Tieslau, M. A. (2001): International Trade and Developing Countries: An Empirical Investigation of the Linder Hypothesis. Applied Economics, 33(1): 649–657.
Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic (2013): Stratégia Podpory Exportu Slovenskej Republiky Na Obdobie 2014–2020 (Export Promotion Strategy of Slovakia for 2014–2020). Bratislava.
Tang, K. K. (2011): Correcting the Size Bias in Trade Openness and Globalization Measures. Global Economy Journal, 11(3): 1–23.
Thursby, J. G. – Thursby, M. C. (1987): Bilateral Trade Flows, the Linder Hypothesis, and Exchange Risk. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3): 488–495.
UNCTAD (2014): UNCTAD Stat. Available Online: Http://Unctadstat.Unctad.Org/Wds/Reportfolders/Reportfolders.Aspx.
Vona, S. (1991): On the Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade: Some Further Thoughts. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(4): 678–700.
World Bank (2014a): World Bank Data. Available Online: Http://Data.Worldbank.Org/.
World Bank (2014b): World Bank Analytical Classifications. Available Online: Http://Siteresources. Worldbank.Org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/OGHIST.Xls.
WTO (2012): A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. Geneve.
WTO (2014): World Trade Report 2014. Geneve.
Yoshida, Y. – Leitao, N. C. – Faustino, H. C. (2009): Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and Foreign Direct Investment between Japan and European Countries. Atlantic Economic Journal, 37(4): 351–365.
Zídek, L. (2014): Evaluation of Economic Transformation in Hungary. Review of Economic Perspectives, 14(1): 55–88.