View More View Less
  • 1 University of Debrecen
  • | 2 ExxonMobil
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

The end of the Communist regime brought about great changes in the economies of Central and Eastern Europe; the restructuring of foreign trade was one of the biggest challenges for these countries. After the transition period, Hungary became a very open country, with its trade to GDP ratio around 1.5, while trading with more than 190 countries. The aim of this paper is to analyse the determinants of exports between 1993–2014, with an emphasis on the impact of factor endowments. According to our results, economic size, common border, and free trade agreements had a statistically significant positive effect on exports, while the coefficient of distance had the expected negative sign. We measured factor endowments with several approaches and our results show that exports change in line with the Linder hypothesis, i.e. Hungary tends to trade more with countries having similar factor endowments, and thus its trade is based on differentiated products.

  • Ahmad, N. (2013): Estimating Trade in Value-Added: Why and How? In: Elms, D. K.Low, P. (eds): Global Value Chains in a Changing World, pp. 85108. Switzerland: WTO Publications.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, J. E. (1979): A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review, 69(1): 106116.

  • Anderson, J. E. (2010): The Gravity Model. Working Paper, No. 16576, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Anderson, J. E.Van Wincoop, E. (2001): Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. Working Paper, No. 8079. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Antonucci, D.Manzocchi, S. (2006): Does Turkey Have a Special Trade Relation with the EU? A Gravity Model Approach. Economic Systems, 30(2): 157169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Antweiler, W.Trefler, D. (2002): Increasing Returns and All That: A View from Trade. American Economic Review, 92(1): 93119.

  • Azhar, A. K. M.Elliott, R. J. R. (2004): On the Measurement of Vertical and Horizontal Intra– Industry Trade: A Geometric Exposition. Graduate School of Management Research Paper Series, GRPS, 03/04, University Putra, Malaysia. Presented at the European Trade Study Group 6th Annual Conference, ETSG, September 9–11, Nottingham

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baldwin, R.Taglioni, D. (2006): Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations. Working Paper, No. 12516, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Baskaran, T.Blöchl, F.Brück, T.Theis, F. J. (2011): The Heckscher–Ohlin Model and the Network Structure of International Trade. International Review of Economics & Finance, 20(2): 135145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Batra, A. (2006): India’s Global Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach. Global Economic Review, 35(3): 327361.

  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1989): The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1): 143153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernard, A. B.Jensen, J. B.Schott, P. K. (2003): Falling Trade Costs, Heterogeneous Firms, and Industry Dynamics. Working Paper, No. 9639. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernard, A. B.Jensen, J. B.Redding, S. J.Schott, P. K. (2007): Firms in International Trade. Working Paper, No. 13054, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bock, Gy. (1995): A hazai külgazdasági liberalizáció elorehaladása és megalapozottsága (Progress and Grounding of the Domestic Foreign Trade Liberalisation). Külgazdaság, 39(9): 420.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brülhart, M. (2009): An Account of Global Intraindustry Trade, 1962–2006. The World Economy, 32(3): 401459.

  • Cabral, M.Falvey, R.Milner, C. (2013): Endowment Differences and the Composition of Intra- Industry Trade. Review of International Economics, 21(3): 401418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Costinot, A.Donaldson, D. (2012): Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence. Working Paper, No. 17969, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, D. R.Weinstein, D. E. (2001): An Account of Global Factor Trade. American Economic Review, 91(5): 14231453.

  • Davis, D. R.Weinstein, D. E.Bradford, S. C.Shimpo, K. (1997): Using International and Japanese Regional Data to Determine when the Factor Abundance Theory of Trade Works. American Economic Review, 87(3): 421446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dixit, A. K.Stiglitz, J. E. (1977): Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. The American Economic Review, 297308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eaton, J.Kortum, S. (2002): Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica, 70(5): 17411779.

  • Eicher, T. S.Henn, C.Papageorgiou, C. (2012): Trade Creation and Diversion Revisited: Accounting for Model Uncertainty and Natural Trading Partner Effects. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(2): 296321.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Erdey, L.Pöstényi, A. (2014): Determinants of Foreign Trade of Hungary: Trade Theory and the Gravity Model. In: Bóta, G.Ormos, M. (eds): SSEM EuroConference 2014: The International Conference on Emerging Markets Business, Economics and Finance, pp. 32-66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Falvey, R. E. (1981): Commercial Policy and Intra–Industry Trade. Journal of International Economics, 11(4): 495511.

  • Falvey, R. E.Kierzkowski, H. (1987): Product Quality, Intra-Industry Trade and (Im)Perfect Competition. In: Kierzkowski, H. (ed.): Protection and Competition in International Trade: Essays in Honor of W. M. Corden. Oxford University Press, pp. 143161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flam, H.Helpman, E. (1987): Vertical Product Differentiation and North — South Trade. The American Economic Review, 77(5): 810822.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fontagné, L.Freudenberg, M.Gaulier, G. (2005): Disentangling Horizontal and Vertical Intra- Industry Trade. CEPII document de travail, 2005–10, Paris: Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gabszewicz, J.Shaked, A.Sutton, J. — Thisse, J.–F. (1981): International Trade in Differentiated Products. International Economic Review, 22(3): 527534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gabszewicz, J.Turrini, A. (1997): Workers’ Skills, Product Quality and Industry Equilibrium. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 18(4): 575593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grubel, H. G.Lloyd, P. J. (1975): Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. London: Macmillan Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haucap, J.Wey, C.Bambold, J. (2000): Location Costs, Product Quality and Implicit Franchise Contracts. Journal of International Economics, 52(1): 6987.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hausmann, R.Hidalgo, C. A.Stock, D. P.Yildirim, M. A. (2014): Implied Comparative Advantage. CID Working Paper, No. 276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Helpman, E.Krugman, P. R. (1985): Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Köves, A. (2003): A KGST-kereskedelemtol az EU-csatlakozásig. A kereskedelmi reorientáció néhány fobb kérdése a rendszerváltó országokban, különös tekintettel Magyarországra, I. Kontinuitás és diszkontinuitás a külkereskedelmi kapcsolatokban (From CMEA Trading To EU Accession. Issues of Trade Reorientation in the System-Changing Countries, Especially Hungary. I. Continuity and Discontinuity in Trade Relations). Közgazdasági Szemle, 50(7): 635653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krugman, P. R. (1979): Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(4): 469479.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krugman, P. R. (1981): Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(5): 959.

  • Krugman, P. R.Obstfeld, M. (1988): International Economics: Theory and Policy. Glenview: Scott Foresman.

  • Lancaster, K. (1979): Variety, Equity, and Efficiency: Product Variety in an Industrial Society. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Lancaster, K. (1980): Intra-Industry Trade under Perfect Monopolistic Competition. Journal of International Economics, 10(2): 151175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leamer, E. E. (1980): The Leontief Paradox, Reconsidered. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(3): 495503.

  • Leamer, E. E. (1992): Testing Trade Theory. Working Paper, No. 3957. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Leontief, W. (1953): Domestic Production and Foreign Trade; The American Capital Position Re- Examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, pp. 332349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Linder, S. B. (1961): An Essay on Trade and Transformation. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.

  • Mátyás, L. (1997): Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model. The World Economy, 20(3): 363368.

  • Melitz, M. (2003): The Impact of Trade on Aggregate Industry Productivity and Intra-Industry Reallocations. Econometrica, 71(6): 16951725.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miroudot, S.Sauvage, J.Shepherd, B. (2013): Measuring the Cost of International Trade in Services. World Trade Review, 12(4): 719735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Montenegro, C. E.Soto, R. (1996): How Distorted is Cuba’s Trade? Evidence and Predictions from a Gravity Model. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 5(1): 4568.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Motta, M. (1994): International Trade and Investment in a Vertically Differentiated Industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12(2): 179196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nagy, A. (1995): A behozatal liberalizálása Magyarországon (Liberalization of Imports in Hungary). Közgazdasági Szemle, 42(5): 454470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rahman, M. M. (2003): A Panel Data Analysis of Bangladesh’s Trade: The Gravity Model Approach. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the European Trade Study Group (ETSG2003). 11–13 September, Madrid.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reimer, J. J.Hertel, T. W. (2010): Nonhomothetic Preferences and International Trade. Review of International Economics, 18(2): 408425.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schumacher, D. (2003): Home Market and Traditional Effects on Comparative Advantage in a Gravity Approach. DIW Diskussionspapiere, No. 344, Berlin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shaked, A.Sutton, J. (1984): Natural Oligopolies and International Trade. In: Kierzkowski, H. (ed.): Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shaked, A.Sutton, J. (1987): Product Differentiation and Industrial Structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(2): 131146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shirotori, M.Tumurchudur, B.Cadot, O. (2010): Revealed Factor Intensity Indices at the Product Level. UNCTAD.

  • Sohn, C. H. (2005): Does the Gravity Model Explain South Korea’s Trade Flows? Japanese Economic Review, 56(4): 417430.

  • Spence, M. (1976): Product Selection, Fixed Costs, and Monopolistic Competition. The Review of Economic Studies, 43(2): 217235.

  • Tinbergen, J. (1962): Shaping the World Economy; Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

  • Trefler, D. (1993): International Factor Price Differences: Leontief was Right! Journal of Political Economy, 101(3): 961987.

  • Trefler, D. (1995): The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries. The American Economic Review, 85(5): 10291046.

  • Trefler, D.Zhu, S. C. (2010): The Structure of Factor Content Predictions. Journal of International Economics, 82(2): 195207.

  • Vanek, J. (1968): The Factor Proportions Theory: The n-Factor Case. Kyklos, 21(4): 749756.

  • WTO (1998): Trade Policy Review of Hungary. United Nations Report by the Secretariat, WT/ TPR/S/40, June 15.

  • WTO (2015): World Economic Situation and Prospects 2015. New York: United Nations.

  • Yip, T. L. (2012): Seaborne Trade between Developed and Developing Countries. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3): 369389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

The description of the refereeing procedure is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

  • Ádám Török (Chairman) / University of Pannonia; Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Edina Berlinger / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Finance
  • Péter Halmai / Budapest University of Technology and Economics; National University of Public Service
  • István Kónya / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies, University of Pécs
  • János Köllő / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies
  • István Magas / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of World Economy; University of Physical Education, Department. of Sports and Decision Sciences
 

Advisory Board

  • Ǻslund, Anders, Institute of International Economics, Washington (USA)
  • Kolodko, Grzegorz, Kozminski University, Warsaw (Poland)
  • Mau, Vladimir, Academy of National Economy (Russia)
  • Messerlin, Patrick A, Groupe d’Economie Mondiale (France)
  • Saul Estrin, London School of Economics (UK)
  • Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, Europa Universität Viadrina (Germany)

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Index Copernicus

 

2020  
Total Cites 275
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,875
Rank by Economics 325/377 (Q4)
Impact Factor  
Impact Factor 0,534
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year 0,500
Impact Factor
Journal  0,38
Citation Indicator  
Rank by Journal  Economics 347/549 (Q3)
Citation Indicator   
Citable 37
Items
Total 37
Articles
Total 0
Reviews
Scimago 13
H-index
Scimago 0,292
Journal Rank
Scimago Economics and Econometrics Q3
Quartile Score  
Scopus 225/166=1,4
Scite Score  
Scopus Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank  
Scopus 0,668
SNIP  
Days from  289
sumbission  
to acceptance  
Days from  447
acceptance  
to publication  

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
212
Impact Factor 0,914
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,728
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,650
Immediacy
Index
0,156
Citable
Items
45
Total
Articles
45
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
3,9
Citing
Half-Life
9,5
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00015
Article Influence
Score
0,052
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,01891
Average
IF
Percentile
28,437
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,439
Scopus
Scite Score
214/165=1,3
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,989

 

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2021 Online subsscription: 588 EUR / 732 USD
Print + online subscription: 688 EUR / 860 USD
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 600 EUR / 750 USD
Print + online subscription: 704 EUR / 880 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 71
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
May 2021 14 0 0
Jun 2021 26 0 0
Jul 2021 9 0 0
Aug 2021 16 0 0
Sep 2021 27 1 1
Oct 2021 16 0 0
Nov 2021 0 0 0