View More View Less
  • 1 University of Pitesti, Romania
  • | 2 University of Belgrade, Serbia
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

In order to define and implement the most effective measures to overcome the difficulties of the post-crisis period, the policy-makers of ECB must identify not just main weaknesses of each banking system, but their strong points also. This requires the application of multi-criteria analysis, considering that policy-makers need to take into account a number of different aspects that, on the whole, indicate the quality of the banking system. Our aim is a comparative analysis of European banking systems right after the Brexit moment and within the framework of the tight new Basel III regulations. In this paper, we have ranked the banking systems of the 28 EU member states using multi-criteria analysis, specifically the PROMETHEE II method. The use of the PROMETHEE II method in combination with the entropy method offers a comprehensive insight into the banking system of each member state, given that the observed countries are ranked according to 9 conflicting criteria that are mostly used in banking system analysis. Our analysis shows that the banking systems in Central and Eastern Europe are the best performers, while the EMU’s developed banking systems such as the German, Italian, British, and French one are positioned among the last ranked. The Portuguese and Greek banking systems are, as expected, ranked in the last positions in our list. The obtained results also pointed out that the ECB should change its approach to the management and further development of a European Banking Union.

  • Abildgren, K.Thomsen, J. (2011): A Tale of Two Danish Banking Crises. Monetary Review, 1st Quarter, Part 1: 121142, Danmarks.

  • Bank of Finland (2015): Concentrated Banking System Amplifies Banking Crisis. Bulletin, 2/2015 (Available online at https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitstream/handle/123456789/13774/bulletin215_6.pdf?sequence=1, accessed on 10th April 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank of Slovenia (2016): The Financial Stability Review. Ljubljana, Slovenia.

  • Bákor, K.Dietz, M.Kincses, A.Shvakman, I. (2012): Eastern European Banking: Time to Shift Gears. Banking and Securities (Europe). McKinsey & Company.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bayyurt, N. (2013): Ownership Effect on Bank’s Performance: Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches on Foreign and Domestic Turkish Banks. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99(6): 919928.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Behr, P.Schmidt, R. H. (2015): The German Banking System: Characteristics and Challenges. White Paper, No. 32, Research Center SAFE, Goethe University, Frankfurt.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Behzadian, M.Kazemzadeh, R. B.Albadvi, A.Aghadasi, M. (2010): PROMETHEE: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Methodologies and Applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1): 198215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bertelsmann Stiftung (2016): Hungary Country Report. (Available online at https://www.btiproject.org/fileadmin/files/BTI/Downloads/Reports/2016/pdf/BTI_2016_Hungary.pdf, accessed on 10th January 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brans, J.Mareschal, B. (2005): PROMETHEE Method. In: Greco, S. (ed.): Multiple Criteria Analysis – State of the Art Surveys: International Series in Operations Research and Management Sciences. New York: Springer, pp. 163195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brans, J. P. (1982): L’ingenierie de la Decision. Elaboration d’Instruments d’Aide a la Decision. Methode PROMETHEE. In: Nadeau, R.Landry, M. (eds): L’aide a la Decision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives Davenir. Quebec, Canada: Presses de Universite Laval, pp. 183214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brans, J. P.Mareschal, B. (1994): The PROMCALC & GAIA Decision Support System for Multicriteria Decision Aid. Decision Support Systems, 12(4–5): 297310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brans, J. P.Mareschal, B. (1995): The PROMETHEE VI Procedure: How to Differentiate Hard from Soft Multicriteria Problems. Journal of Decision Systems, 4(3): 213223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brans, J. P.Vincke, P. (1985): A Preference Ranking Organization Method (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making). Management Science, 31(6): 647656.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brans, J. P.Mareschal, B.Vincke, Ph. (1984): PROMETHEE: A New Family of Outranking Methods in Multi-Criteria Analysis. In: Brans, J. P. (ed.): Operational Research ‘84. Amsterdam: North-Holland. pp. 477490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Căpraru, B.Ihnatov, I. (2015): Determinants of Bank’s Profitability in EU15. Scientific Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi Economic Sciences, 62(1): 93101

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Celen, A. (2014): Comparative Analysis of Normalization Procedures in TOPSIS Method with an Application to Turkish Deposit Banking Market. Informatica, 25(2): 185208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cetin, K.Cetin, I. E. (2010): Multicriteria Analysis of Banks Performance. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 2(2): 7378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, T. Y.Li, C. H. (2011): Objective Weights with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy Measures and Computational Experiment Analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 11(8): 54115423.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chuansheng, X.Dapeng, D.Shengping, H.Xin, X.Yingjie, C. (2012): Safety Evaluation of Smart Grid Based on AHP-Entropy Method. Systems Engineering Procedia, 4: 203209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Constâncio, V. (2016): Challenges for the European Banking Industry. Presentation at the Conference on “European Banking Industry: What’s Next?” University of Navarra, Madrid, 7 July 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dobre, C. (2015): Concentration in the Banking Sector in Romania and Bulgaria. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 15(1): 7579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doumpos, M.Zopounidis, C. (2002): Multi-Criteria Classification Methods in Financial and Banking Decisions. International Transactions in Operational Research, 9(5): 567581.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doumpos, M.Zopounidis, C. (2010): A Multicriteria Decision Support System for Bank Rating. Decision Support Systems, 50(1): 5563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doumpos, M.Marinakis, Y.Marinaki, M.Zopounidis, C. (2009): An Evolutionary Approach to Construction of Outranking Models for Multicriteria Classification: The Case of the ELECTRE TRI Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(2): 496505.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ermatita , Hartati, S.Wardoyo, R.Harjoko, A. (2012): ELECTRE-Entropy Method in Group Decision Support System Modelto Gene Mutation Detection. International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence, 1(1): 5863.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Bank Authority (2016): Dynamics and Drivers of Non-Performing Exposures in the EU Banking Sector. EBA Report, 22 July 2016, London.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Banking Authority (2016): Risk Dashboard Q2-2016 (Available online at https://www.eba.europa.eu/risk-analysis-and-data/risk-dashboard, accessed on 21st November 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission (2015): Country Report Slovenia 2015. Commission staff working document.

  • Gaganis, C.Pasiouras, F.Doumpos, M.Zopounidis, C. (2010): Modelling Banking Sector Stability with Multicriteria Approaches. Optimization Letters, 4(4): 543558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guo, C. Z. (2001): Study on the Evaluating Method of Entropy Coefficient for Stock Investment Value [J]. Nankai Economics Studies, 5: 6567.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Haas, R.Korniyenko, R. Y.Pivovarsky, A.Tsankova, T. (2015): Taming the Herd? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 24(3): 325355.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hassan, F. (2014): Finance Watch, a View from Germany – How the Three-Pillared German Banking System has Got through the Crisis. (Available at http://www.finance-watch.org/hot-topics/blog/851-view-from-germany-1, accessed on 9th December 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Havrylchyk, O.Jurzyk, E. (2006): Profitability of Foreign and Domestic Banks in Central and Eastern Europe: Does the Mode of Entry Matter? LICOS Centre for Transition Economics, Discussion Paper, No. 166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Härle, P.Lüders, E.Pepanides, T.Pfetsch, S.Poppensieker, T.Stegemann, U. (2010): Basel III and European Banking: Its Impact, How Banks Might Respond, and the Challenges of Implementation. McKinsey Working Papers on Risk, November, 26: 128. (Available at C:/Users/BVB09/Downloads/26_Basel_III_and_European_banking.pdf, accessed on 12th January 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hribernik-Markovic, T.Tomec, M. (2015): Bad Bank and Other Possible Banks’ Rescuing Models – the Case of Slovenia. Annals of the Constantin Brâncuşi University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, 1(1): 128141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hwang, C. L.Lin, M. J. (1987): Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

  • Hwang, C. L.Yoon, K. (1981): Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Methods and Applications. A State-of-the-Art Survey. New York: Springer Verlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IMF (2011): Kingdom of the Nederlands Financial System Stability Assesment. IMF Country Report, No.144. Washington, D.C. (Available at http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2016/12/31/Kingdom-of-Netherlands-Netherlands-Financial-System-Stability-Assessment-24986, accessed on 10th April 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IMF (2016): Bulgaria: Selected Paper Issues. IMF Country Report, No. 345. Washington, D.C.

  • Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M.Smaga, P.Witkowski, B. (2016): Bank Restructuring in the EU: Which Way to Go? Journal of Policy Modelling, 38(3): 572586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Košak, M.Zajc, P. (2006): Determinants of Bank Efficiency Differences in the New EU Member Countries. Financial Stability Report, Expert Papers. Ljubljana: Bank of Slovenia.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KPMG (2016): The State of Dutch Banks in 2015. Adjusting to the New Reality. KPMG Advisory. (Available at https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/04/The-state-of-Dutchbanks-in-2015-14-07-2016.pdf, accessed on 10th April 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kraeva, K.Clegg, R. (2016): Bulgaria: Reading between the Lines of the Banking System Assessment. Wolf Theiss Client Alert, August 2016. (Available at http://www.wolftheiss.com/fileadmin/content/6_news/clientAlerts/2016/2016_Q3/160819_CA_Reading_Between_the_Lines_of_the_Banking_System_Assesment_Bulgaria.pdf, accessed on 10th April 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, X.Li, Y.Gu, Z.Yang, W. (2004): Competitive Situation Analysis of Regional Logistics Development based on AHP and Entropy Weight. Journal of Southeast University, 34(3): 398401.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mandic, K.Delibasic, B.Knezevic, S.Benkovic, S. (2014): Analysis of the Financial Parameters of Serbian Banks through the Application of the Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methods. Economic Modelling, 43: 3037.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meng, Q. S. (1989): Information Theory [M]. Xi’An Jiaotong University Press, China: 1936.

  • Nikolic, Dj.Jovanovic, I.Mihajlovic, I.Živković, Ž. (2009): Multi-Criteria Ranking of Copper Concentrates according to Their Quality – An Element of Environmental Management in the Vicinity of Copper – Smelting Complex in Bor, Serbia. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(2): 509515.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Obradović, S.Fedajev, A.Nikolic, D. (2012): Analisys of Business Environment Using the Multi-Criteria Approach – Case of Balkan’s Transition Countries. Serbian Journal of Management, 7(1): 3752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD (2014): OECD Economic Surveys – Denmark Overview. Paris.

  • Önder, E.Hepşen, A. (2013): Combining Time Series Analysis and Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques for Forecasting Financial Performance of Banks in Turkey. International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences, 3(3): 530555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Qiu, W. H. (2002): The Entropy of Decision and Application of Management [M]. China Machine Press: 193196.

  • Rădulescu, M. (2014): Developments of the Banking Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Berlin: Lambert Academic Publishing.

  • Rosenzweig, V. V.Volarević, H.Varović, M. (2013): A Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Banking System in the Republic of Croatia. Journal of Theory and Practice, 37(4): 403422.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schiereck, D.Kiesel, F.Kolaric, S. (2016): Brexit: (Not) Another Lehman Moment for Banks? Finance Research Letters, 19: 291297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seçme, N. Y.Bayrakdaroğlu, A.Kahraman, C. (2009): Fuzzy Performance Evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector Using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9): 1169911709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shabani, M.Toporowski, J.Tyson, J. (2014): The Financial System and Economic Policy in the UK: Problems of Internationalisation. In: Financial Systems in Financial Crisis – An Analysis of Banking Systems in the EU. Intereconomics, ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, Germany, pp.: 7076 (Available at https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/IEForum22014.pdf, accessed on 9th April 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shannon, C. E. (1984): A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3): 379423.

  • Schoenmaker, D.Peek, T. (2014): The State of the Banking Sector in Europe. OECD, Economics Department, Working Paper, No. 1102.

  • Spathis, C.Doumpos, M.Zopounidis, C. (2002): Detecting Falsified Financial Statements: A Comparative Study Using Multicriteria Analysis and Multivariate Statistical Techniques. European Accounting Review, 11(3): 509535.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Titko, J.Skvarciany, V.Jureviciene, D. (2015): Drivers of Bank Profitability: Case of Latvia and Lithuania. Intellectual Economics, 9(2): 120129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Váradi, B.Várnai, T.Virág, B. (2016): Brexit: The End or the Beginning of a Long Road. Acta Oeconomica, 66(S1): 93110.

  • Vollmer, U. (2016): The Asymmetric Implementation of the European Banking Union (EBU): Consequences for Financial Stability. International Journal of Management and Economics, 50: 726.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weder, B. (2001): Institutional Reform in Transition Economies. IMF Working Paper, No. 114.

  • Wu, H.Tzeng, G.Chen, Y. (2009): A Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Banking Performance Based on Balanced Scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6): 1013510147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zeleny, M. (1982): Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Zou, Z.Yun, Y.Sun, J. (2006): Entropy Method for Determination of Weight of Evaluating Indicators in Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation for Water Quality Assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18(5): 10201023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

The description of the refereeing procedure is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

  • Ádám Török (Chairman) / University of Pannonia; Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Edina Berlinger / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Finance
  • Péter Halmai / Budapest University of Technology and Economics; National University of Public Service
  • István Kónya / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies, University of Pécs
  • János Köllő / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies
  • István Magas / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of World Economy; University of Physical Education, Department. of Sports and Decision Sciences
 

Advisory Board

  • Ǻslund, Anders, Institute of International Economics, Washington (USA)
  • Kolodko, Grzegorz, Kozminski University, Warsaw (Poland)
  • Mau, Vladimir, Academy of National Economy (Russia)
  • Messerlin, Patrick A, Groupe d’Economie Mondiale (France)
  • Saul Estrin, London School of Economics (UK)
  • Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, Europa Universität Viadrina (Germany)

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Index Copernicus

 

2020  
Total Cites 275
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,875
Rank by Economics 325/377 (Q4)
Impact Factor  
Impact Factor 0,534
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year 0,500
Impact Factor
Journal  0,38
Citation Indicator  
Rank by Journal  Economics 347/549 (Q3)
Citation Indicator   
Citable 37
Items
Total 37
Articles
Total 0
Reviews
Scimago 13
H-index
Scimago 0,292
Journal Rank
Scimago Economics and Econometrics Q3
Quartile Score  
Scopus 225/166=1,4
Scite Score  
Scopus Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank  
Scopus 0,668
SNIP  
Days from  289
sumbission  
to acceptance  
Days from  447
acceptance  
to publication  

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
212
Impact Factor 0,914
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,728
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,650
Immediacy
Index
0,156
Citable
Items
45
Total
Articles
45
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
3,9
Citing
Half-Life
9,5
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00015
Article Influence
Score
0,052
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,01891
Average
IF
Percentile
28,437
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,439
Scopus
Scite Score
214/165=1,3
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,989

 

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2021 Online subsscription: 588 EUR / 732 USD
Print + online subscription: 688 EUR / 860 USD
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 600 EUR / 750 USD
Print + online subscription: 704 EUR / 880 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 71
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)