Author:
Andrea Szalavetz
szalavetz.andrea@krtk.mta.hu
Andrea Szalavetz
Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Search for other papers by Andrea Szalavetz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrea Szalavetz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The purpose of the paper is to explain the widely-observed phenomenon that the benefits of some apparently environmentally friendly solutions are much smaller than predicted. The applied research method is a systematic review of papers belonging to the ‘business and environment’ and ‘environmental science and technology’ literatures. Qualitative and interpretive research is used to support our propositions. Five key concepts accounting for the pitfalls associated with environmental sustainability-oriented (ESO) interventions have been identified and illustrated with reallife examples. Overlooked (1) interconnections among resources and environmental impacts, e.g. trade-offs, reveal that (2) system boundaries are often ill-defined, which can easily result in (3) problem shifting from one aspect of corporate environmental performance to another or from one stage in the life cycle to another. Additionally, false (4) assumptions and a strong (5) contextuality of best practices also overshadow the outcomes of ESO interventions. The relation among these general concepts is analysed and a graphic representation is provided.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Abbasi, S. A. – Abbasi, N. (2000): The Likely Adverse Environmental Impacts of Renewable Energy Sources. Applied Energy, 65(1): 121–144.
-
Adams, R. – Jeanrenaud, S. – Bessant, J. – Denyer, D. – Overy, P. (2016): Sustainability-Oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2): 180–205.
-
Allwood, J. M. – Ashby, M. F. – Gutowski, T. G. – Worrell, E. (2013): Material Efficiency: Providing Material Services with Less Material Production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1986): 1–15.
-
Altuzarra, A. (2016): Convergence R&D Intensity across European Countries. Acta Oeconomica, 66(2): 351–374.
-
Ambec, S. – Lanoie, P. (2008): Does it Pay to be Green? A Systematic Overview. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4): 45–62.
-
Aragón-Correa, J. A. – Rubio-Lopez, E. A. (2007): Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategies: Myths and Misunderstandings. Long Range Planning, 40(3): 357–381.
-
Arushanyan, Y. – Ekener-Petersen, E. – Finnveden, G. (2014): Lessons Learned – Review of LCAs for ICT Products and Services. Computers in Industry, 65(2): 211–234.
-
Astrup, T. F. – Tonini, D. – Turconi, R. – Boldrin, A. (2015): Life Cycle Assessment of Thermal Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Review and Recommendations. Waste Management, 37: 104–115.
-
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1): 51–79.
-
Bazan, E. – Jaber, M. Y. – El Saadany, A. M. (2015): Carbon Emissions and Energy Effects on Manufacturing–Remanufacturing Inventory Models. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 88: 307–316.
-
Bossi, T. – Gediga, J. (2017): The Environmental Profile of Platinum Group Metals. Johnson Matthey Technology Review, 61(2): 111–121.
-
Burritt, R. – Christ, K. (2016): Industry 4.0 and Environmental Accounting: A New Revolution? Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1(1): 23–38.
-
Byggeth, S. – Hochschorner, E. (2006): Handling Trade-Offs in Ecodesign Tools for Sustainable Product Development and Procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15): 1420–1430.
-
Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. – Könnölä, T. (2010): Diversity of Eco-Innovations: Reflections from Selected Case Studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10): 1073–1083.
-
Chertow, M. R. (2000): Industrial Symbiosis: Literature and Taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1): 313–337.
-
Cohen, W. M. – Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly: 128–152.
-
Colledani, M. – Tolio, T. – Fischer, A. – Iung, B. – Lanza, G. – Schmitt, R. – Váncza, J. (2014): Design and Management of Manufacturing Systems for Production Quality. CIRP Annals- Manufacturing Technology, 63(2): 773–796.
-
Davis, L. W. – Fuchs, A. – Gertler, P. (2014): Cash for Coolers: Evaluating a Large-Scale Appliance Replacement Program in Mexico. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4): 207–238.
-
Delmas, M. A. – Burbano, V. C. (2011): The Drivers of Greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1): 64–87.
-
Doz, Y. (2011): Qualitative Research for International Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 582–590.
-
Duflou, J. R. – Sutherland, J. W. – Dornfeld, D. – Herrmann, C. – Jeswiet, J. – Hauschild, M. – Kara, S. – Kellens, K. (2012): Towards Energy and Resource Efficient Manufacturing: A Processes and Systems Approach. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 61(2): 587–609.
-
Ferguson, M. E. – Souza, G. C. (eds.) (2010): Closed-Loop Supply Chains: New Developments to Improve the Sustainability of Business Practices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
-
Figge, F. – Hahn, T. (2005): The Cost of Sustainability Capital and the Creation of Sustainable Value by Companies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4): 47–58.
-
Fink, A. (2012): How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. Los Angeles CA: Sage Publications.
-
Finnveden, G. – Hauschild, M. Z. – Ekvall, T. – Guinée, J. – Heijungs, R. – Hellweg, S. – Koehler, A. – Pennington, D. – Suh, S. (2009): Recent Developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1): 1–21.
-
Ford, S. – Despeisse, M. (2016): Additive Manufacturing and Sustainability: An Exploratory Study of the Advantages and Challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 1573–1587.
-
Glaser, B. G. (1965): The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis. Social Problems, 12(4): 436–445.
-
Gold, A. H. – Malhotra, A. – Segars, A. H. (2001): Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 185–214.
-
Gómez-Pastora, J. – Bringas, E. – Ortiz, I. (2014): Recent Progress and Future Challenges on the Use of High Performance Magnetic Nano-Adsorbents in Environmental Applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 256: 187–204.
-
Graff Zivin, J. S. – Kotchen, M. J. – Mansur, E. T. (2014): Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity of Marginal Emissions: Implications for Electric Cars and Other Electricity-Shifting Policies. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107: 248–268.
-
Greening, L. A. – Greene, D. L. – Difiglio, C. (2000): Energy Efficiency and Consumption – The Rebound Effect – A Survey. Energy Policy, 28(6): 389–401.
-
Guezuraga, B. – Zauner, R. – Pölz, W. (2012): Life Cycle Assessment of Two Different 2 MW Class Wind Turbines. Renewable Energy, 37(1): 37–44.
-
Haffar, M. – Searcy, C. (2017): Classification of Trade-Offs Encountered in the Practice of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3): 495–522.
-
Hahn, T. – Figge, F. – Pinkse, J. – Preuss, L. (2010): Trade-Offs in Corporate Sustainability: You Can’t Have Your Cake and Eat It. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4): 217–229.
-
Hart, S. L. (1995): A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 986–1014.
-
Hart, S. L. – Dowell, G. (2011): A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After. Journal of Management, 37(5): 1464–1479.
-
Hischier, R. – Walser, T. (2012): Life Cycle Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials: State of the Art and Strategies to Overcome Existing Gaps. Science of the Total Environment, 425: 271–282.
-
Holland, S. P. – Mansur, E. T. – Muller, N. Z. – Yates, A. J. (2016): Are There Environmental Benefits From Driving Electric Vehicles? The Importance of Local Factors. American Economic Review, 106(12): 3700–3729.
-
Huesemann, M. H. (2001): Can Pollution Problems be Effectively Solved by Environmental Science and Technology? An Analysis of Critical Limitations. Ecological Economics, 37(2): 271–287.
-
Hussein, A. K. (2015): Applications of Nanotechnology in Renewable Energies – A Comprehensive Overview and Understanding. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42: 460–476.
-
Kallio, T. J. (2007): Taboos in Corporate Social Responsibility Discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2): 165–175.
-
Ketata, I. – Sofka, W. – Grimpe, C. (2015): The Role of Internal Capabilities and Firms’ Environment for Sustainable Innovation: Evidence for Germany. R&D Management, 45(1): 60–75.
-
Klaine, S. J. – Koelmans, A. A. – Horne, N. – Carley, S. – Handy, R. D. – Kapustka, L. – Nowack, B. – von der Kammer, F. (2012): Paradigms to Assess the Environmental Impact of Manufactured Nanomaterials. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 31(1): 3–14.
-
Korhonen, J. (2005): Industrial Ecology for Sustainable Development: Six Controversies in Theory Building. Environmental Values, 14(1): 83–112.
-
Larcher, D. – Tarascon, J. M. (2015): Towards Greener and More Sustainable Batteries for Electrical Energy Storage. Nature Chemistry, 7(1): 19–29.
-
Laurent, A. – Bakas, I. – Clavreul, J. – Bernstad, A. – Niero, M. – Gentil, E. – Hauschild, M. Z. – Christensen, T. H. (2014): Review of LCA Studies of Solid Waste Management Systems–Part I: Lessons Learned and Perspectives. Waste Management, 34(3): 573–588.
-
Liu, C. – Li, F. – Ma, L. P. – Cheng, H. M. (2010): Advanced Materials for Energy Storage. Advanced Materials, 22(8): 28–62.
-
Liu, W. W. – Zhang, B. – Li, Y. Z. – He, Y. M. – Zhang, H. C. (2014): An Environmentally Friendly Approach for Contaminants Removal Using Supercritical CO2 for Remanufacturing Industry. Applied Surface Science, 292: 142–148.
-
López, L. A. – Arce, G. – Zafrilla, J. E. (2013): Parcelling Virtual Carbon in the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. Energy Economics, 39: 177–186.
-
Malik, A. – Lan, J. (2016): The Role of Outsourcing in Driving Global Carbon Emissions. Economic Systems Research, 28(2): 168–182.
-
Mann, J. – Teilmann, J. (2013): Environmental Impact of Wind Energy. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 8, 035001, http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035001/pdf.
-
McLellan, B. C. – Corder, G. D. – Ali, S. H. (2013): Sustainability of Rare Earths – An Overview of the State of Knowledge. Minerals, 3(3): 304–317.
-
McMahon, J. E. – Price, S. K. (2011): Water and Energy Interactions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36: 163–191.
-
Montiel, I. – Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014): Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability: Are We There Yet? Organization & Environment, 27(2): 113–139.
-
Nugent, D. – Sovacool, B. K. (2014): Assessing the Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Solar PV and Wind Energy: A Critical Meta-Survey. Energy Policy, 65: 229–244.
-
Pallas, G. – Peijnenburg, W. J. – Guinée, J. B. – Heijungs, R. – Vijver, M. G. (2018): Green and Clean: Reviewing the Justification of Claims for Nanomaterials from a Sustainability Point of View. Sustainability, 10(3): 689.
-
Patton, M. Q. (1990): Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
-
Pennington, D. W. – Potting, J. – Finnveden, G. – Lindeijer, E. – Jolliet, O. – Rydberg, T. – Rebitzer, G. (2004): Life Cycle Assessment Part 2: Current Impact Assessment Practice. Environment International, 30(5): 721–739.
-
Pires, J. C. M. – Martins, F. G. – Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M. – Simões, M. (2011): Recent Developments on Carbon Capture and Storage: An Overview. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89(9): 1446–1460.
-
Porter, M. E. – Van der Linde, C. (1995): Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 97–118.
-
Premalatha, M. – Abbasi, T. – Abbasi, S. A. (2014): Wind Energy: Increasing Deployment, Rising Environmental Concerns. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31: 270–288.
-
Ramus, C. A. – Montiel, I. (2005). When are Corporate Environmental Policies a Form of Greenwashing? Business & Society, 44(4): 377–414.
-
Searcy, C. (2012): Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3): 239–253.
-
Sepúlveda, A. – Schluep, M. – Renaud, F. G. – Streicher, M. – Kuehr, R. – Hagelüken, C. – Gerecke, A. C. (2010): A Review of the Environmental Fate and Effects of Hazardous Substances Released from Electrical and Electronic Equipments during Recycling: Examples from China and India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(1): 28–41.
-
Sheehan, E. – Braun, A. T. – Kuhlmann, T. – Sauer, A. (2016): Improving Material Efficiency for Ultra-Efficient Factories in Closed-Loop Value Networks. Procedia CIRP, 40: 455–462.
-
Simon, H. A. (1957): Models of Man. New York: Wiley&Sons.
-
Strauss, A. – Corbin, J. (2008): Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
-
Suckling, J. – Lee, J. (2015): Redefining Scope: The True Environmental Impact of Smartphones? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(8): 1181–1196.
-
Sundin, E. – Bras, B. (2005): Making Functional Sales Environmentally and Economically Beneficial through Product Remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(9): 913–925.
-
Tamayao, M. A. M. – Michalek, J. J. – Hendrickson, C. – Azevedo, I. M. (2015): Regional Variability and Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Life Cycle CO2 Emissions Across the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(14): 8844–8855.
-
Tsydenova, O. – Bengtsson, M. (2011): Chemical Hazards Associated with Treatment of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Waste Management, 31(1): 45–58.
-
Váncza, J. – Monostori, L. – Lutters, D. – Kumara, S. R. – Tseng, M. – Valckenaers, P. – Van Brussel, H. (2011): Cooperative and Responsive Manufacturing Enterprises. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60(2): 797–820.
-
van den Bergh, J. – Folke, C. – Polasky, S. – Scheffer, M. – Steffen, W. (2015): What if Solar Energy Becomes Really Cheap? A Thought Experiment on Environmental Problem Shifting. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 170–179.
-
WEC (2016): World Energy Resources 2016. London: World Energy Council.
-
Williams, A. – Kennedy, S. – Philipp, F. – Whiteman, G. (2017): Systems Thinking: A Review of Sustainability Management Research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148: 866–881.
-
Yang, Y. – Bae, J. – Kim, J. – Suh, S. (2012): Replacing Gasoline with Corn Ethanol Results in Significant Environmental Problem-Shifting. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(7): 3671–3678.
Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary
E-mail: judit.kalman@uni-corvinus.hu
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- CABELLS Journalytics
- EconLit
- Elsevier GEO Abstracts
- GEOBASE
- Index Copernicus
- International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
- JEL
- Referativnyi Zhurnal
- RePEc
- SCOPUS
- Social Science Citation Index
| 2023 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Journal Impact Factor | 0.7 |
| Rank by Impact Factor | Q3 (Economics) |
| Journal Citation Indicator | 0.23 |
| Scopus | |
| CiteScore | 1.4 |
| CiteScore rank | Q3 (Economics and Econometrics) |
| SNIP | 0.385 |
| Scimago | |
| SJR index | 0.218 |
| SJR Q rank | Q4 |
| Acta Oeconomica | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2025 | Online subsscription: 700 EUR / 768 USD Print + online subscription: 820 EUR / 900 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Acta Oeconomica | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1966 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Magyar Tudományos Akadémia |
| Founder's Address |
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0001-6373 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2659 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2024 | 70 | 1 | 1 |
| Sep 2024 | 64 | 2 | 3 |
| Oct 2024 | 159 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2024 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 2024 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2025 | 29 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Author:
Author:
The system paradigm revisited
Clarification and additions in the light of experiences in the post-socialist region
Author:
Author:
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory