Benford's Law is a useful tool for detecting fraud in financial statements. In this paper we test the financial item named ‘Work performed by the undertaking for its own purpose and capitalised’ applying this tool. The data are taken from the financial reports of all companies submitted to the Serbian Business Register Agency for the period of 2008–2013. Our conclusion shows that there is a very high probability that the frequency distribution of the second digit does not satisfy Benford's Law. In other words, it implies that certain manipulations have been usually done with the second digit of the aforementioned item in the financial statement. This research confirms our hypothesis that financial statement frauds are usually conducted using the second digit.
Amiram, D. – Bozanic, Z. – Rouen, E. (2015): Financial Statement Errors: Evidence from the Distributional Properties of Financial Statement Numbers. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(4): 1540–1593.
Ausloos, M. – Cerqueti, R. – Mir, T. A. (2017): Data Science for Assessing Possible Tax Income Manipulation: The Case of Italy. Chaos, Solitons – Fractals, 104: 238–256.
Benford, F. (1938): The Law of Anomalous Numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78(4): 551–572.
Berger, A. – Hill, T. P. (2011): A Basic Theory of Benford's Law. Probability Surveys, 8: 1–126.
Bhattacharya, S. – Xu, D. – Kumar, K. (2011): An ANN-Based Auditor Decision Support System Using Benford's Law. Decision Support Systems, 50(3): 576–584.
Bose, I. – Piramuthu, S. – Shaw, M. J. (2011): Quantitative Methods for Detection of Financial Fraud. Decision Support Systems, 50(3): 557–558.
Bowlin, K. (2011): Risk-Based Auditing, Strategic Prompts, and Auditor Sensitivity to the Strategic Risk of Fraud. The Accounting Review, 86(4): 1231–1253.
Bumby, R. – Ellentuck, E. (1969): Finitely Additive Measures and the First Digit Problem. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 65(1): 33–42.
Charbonneau, F. – Lachance, R. (2015): Rapport final de la Commission d'enquête sur l'octroi et la gestion des contrats publics dans l'industrie de la construction (Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry on the Awarding and Management of Public Contracts in the Construction Industry). Québec. www.ceic.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/Fichiers_client/fichiers/Rapport_final/Rapport_final_CEIC_Integral_c.pdf.
Clippe, P. – Ausloos, M. (2012): Benford's Law and Theil Transform of Financial Data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 391(24): 6556–6567.
Cohen, D. I. (1976): An Explanation of the First Digit Phenomenon. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 20(3): 367–370.
Commission regulation (EC) No 250/2009 of 11 March 2009 implementing Regulation (EC) No 295/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definitions of characteristics, the technical format for the transmission of data, the double reporting requirements for NACE Rev.1.1 and NACE Rev.2 and derogations to be granted for structural business statistics.
Davis, B. (1976): Some Remarks on Initial Digits. Fibonacci Quartely, 14(1): 13–14.
De Ceuster, M. J. – Dhaene, G. – Schatteman, T. (1998): On the Hypothesis of Psychological Barriers in Stock Markets and Benford's Law. Journal of Empirical Finance, 5(3): 263–279.
Deleanu, I. S. (2017): Do Countries Consistently Engage in Misinforming the International Community about Their Efforts to Combat Money Laundering? Evidence Using Benford's Law. PloS ONE, 12(1): e0169632.
Della Porta, D. – Vannucci, A. (2016): The Hidden Order of Corruption: An Institutional Approach. London: Routledge.
Diaconis, P. (1973): Limits of Measures of the Integers with Application to Random Number Generators and the Distribution of Leading Digits. Memorandum, NS–211, Department of Statistics, Harvard University.
Diekmann, A. (2007): Not the First Digit! Using Benford's Law to Detect Fraudulent Scientific Data. Journal of Applied Statistics, 34(3): 321–329.
Duncan, R. L. (1969): Note on the Initial Digit Problem. Fibonacci Quarterly, 7(5): 474–475.
Durtschi, C. – Hillison, W. – Pacini, C. (2004): The Effective Use of Benford's Law to Assist in Detecting Fraud in Accounting Data. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5(1): 17–34.
Flehinger, B. J. (1966): On the Probability That a Random Integer Has Initial Digit A. The American Mathematical Monthly, 73(10): 1056–1061.
Fourth Council Directive, 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978.
Fu, D. – Shi, Y. Q. – Su, W. (2007): A Generalized Benford's Law for JPEG Coefficients and Its Applications in Image Forensics. In: Electronic Imaging, Vol. 6505, International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Jose, CA, USA: 65051L DOI: 10.1117/12.704723.
Furlan, L. V. (1946): Das Harmoniegesetz der Statistik: Eine Untersuchung über die metrische Interdependenz der sozialen Erscheinungen (The Law of Harmony in Statistics: References 80 Investigations of the Metrical Interdependence of Social Phenomena), volume 2, Beihefte zum Assekuranzjahrbuch. Basel, Switzerland: Verlag für Recht und Gesellschaft A. G.
Gini, C. (1957): Sulla frequenza delle cifre iniziali dei numeri osservati (On the Frequency of Initial Digits of Observed Numbers). Bulletin de l 'Institut International de Statistique, 35(2): 57–76.
Glancy, F. H. – Yadav, S. B. (2011): A Computational Model for Financial Reporting Fraud Detection. Decision Support Systems, 50(3): 595–601.
Gomes da Silva, C. – Carreira, P. M. (2013): Selecting Audit Samples Using Benford's Law. Auditing: A Journal of Practice – Theory, 32(2): 53–65.
Hake, E. R. (2005): Financial Illusion: Accounting for Profits in an Enron World. Journal of Economic Issues, 39(3): 595–611.
Herzel, A. (1957): Sulla distribuzione delle cifre iniziali dei numeri statistici (On the Frequency of Initial Digits of Statistical Numbers). Atti dell XV e XVII Riunione, Societa Italiana di Statistica, Roma, pp. 205–228.
Hill, T. P. (1988): Random-Number Guessing and the First Digit Phenomenon. Psychological Reports, 62(3): 967–971.
Hogan, C. E. – Rezaee, Z. – Riley, R. A. – Velury, U. K. (2008): Financial Statement Fraud: Insights from the Academic Literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice – Theory, 27(2): 231–252.
Jamain, D. (2011): Benford's Law. Dissertation Report. Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London.
Joenssen, D. W. (2013): Two Digit Testing for Benford's Law. Proceedings of the 59th ISI World Statistics Congress, 25–30 August 2013, Hong Kong (Session CPS021): 3881–3886.
Joksimović, D. – Knežević, G. (2016): Benford's Law and the Analysis of the Numerical Data. In: Simović, D. (ed.): International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days”. Proceedings of International Significance, Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, Belgrade, 10 – 11 March 2016, pp. 293–306.
Joksimović, D. – Knežević, G. – Pavlović, V. – Ljubić, M. – Surovy, V. (2017): Some Aspects of the Application of Benford's Law in the Analysis of the Data Set Anomalies. In: Knowledge Discovery in Cyberspace: Statistical Analysis and Predictive Modeling. New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 85–120.
Joyce, B. P. (2001): E-diligence: Money Laundering Risks in the Electronic Arena. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 5(2): 146–149.
Karavardar, A. (2014): Benford's Law and an Analysis in Istanbul Stock Exchange (BIST). International Journal of Business and Management, 9(4): 160–172.
Kumar, K. – Bhattacharya, S. (2007): Detecting the Dubious Digits: Benford's Law in Forensic Accounting. Significance, 4(2): 81–83.
Ljubić, M. – Pavlović, V. (2016): The Role of the Accounting Profession in Prevention and Detection of Financial Statement Fraud. In: Simović, D. (ed.): International Scientific Conference “Archibald Reiss Days”. Proceedings of International Significance, Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, Belgrade, 10 – 11 March 2016, pp. 87–100.
Marai, A. – Pavlović, V. (2013): Earnings Management vs Financial Reporting Fraud – Key Features for Distinguishing. Facta universitatis – series: Economics and Organization, 10(1): 39–47.
Martin, J. (2017): How Strong Forensic Data Analytics Capabilities Allow Companies and Contract Owners to Catch Bidding Fraud. KPMG Forensic Focus, 29 March 2017. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/ca/pdf/2017/03/ca-forensic-focus-fda-against-bidding-fraud.pdf
McAlister, D. (1879): Law of Frequency. Nature, 20(510): 337.
McDaniel, L. S. – Kinney, W. R. (1995): Expectation-Formation Guidance in the Auditor's Review of Interim Financial Information. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(1): 59–76.
Michalski, T. – Stoltz, G. (2013): Do Countries Falsify Economic Data Strategically? Some Evidence That They Might. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2): 591–616.
Mir, T. A. – Ausloos, M. – Cerqueti, R. (2014): Benford's Law Predicted Digit Distribution of Aggregated Income Taxes: The Surprising Conformity of Italian Cities and Regions. The European Physical Journal B, 87(11): 261.
Moser, L. – Macon, N. (1950): On the Distribution of First Digits of Powers. Scripta Mathematica, 16: 290–292.
Newcomb, S. (1881): Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1): 39–40.
Ngai, E. W. T. – Hu, Y. – Wong, Y. H. – Chen, Y. – Sun, X. (2011): The Application of Data Mining Techniques in Financial Fraud Detection: A Classification Framework and an Academic Review of Literature. Decision Support Systems, 50(3): 559–569.
Nigrini, M. J. (2017): Audit Sampling Using Benford's Law: A Review of the Literature with Some New Perspectives. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(2): 29–46.
Pinkham, R. S. (1961): On the Distribution of First Significant Digits. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(4): 1223–1230.
Raimi, R. (1976): The First Digit Problem. The American Mathematical Monthly, 83(7): 521–538.
Rose, J. M. (2007): Attention to Evidence of Aggressive Financial Reporting and Intentional Misstatement Judgments: Effects of Experience and Trust. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19(1): 215–229.
Shi, J. – Ausloos, M. – Zhu, T. (2018): Benford's Law First Significant Digit and Distribution Distances for Testing the Reliability of Financial Reports in Developing Countries. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 492: 878–888.
Smith, F. (1964): Measuring Risk on Consumer Instalment Credit. Management Science, 11(2): 327–340.
Spasić, D. (2016): Recent Changes in Regulatory Framework for Financial Reporting in Serbia – A Step Backward in Internationalization of Business? In: Okręglicka, M. – Gorzeń-Mitka, I. – Lemańska-Majdzik, A. – Sipa, M. – Skibiński, A. (eds): Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Contemporary Issues in Theory and Practice of Management 2016. Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Wydziału Zarządzania Politechniki Częstochowskiej, pp. 403–409.
Stephens, M. A. (1970): Use of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramér–Von Mises and Related Statistics without Extensive Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 32(1): 115–122.
Stoessiger, R. (2013): Benford's Law and Why the Integers Are Not What We Think They Are: A Critical Numeracy of Benford's Law. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 27(1): 29–46.
The Serbian Business Registers Agency (SBRA) webpage: www.apr.gov.rs.
Tóth, I. J. – Hajdu, M. (2016): Competitive Intensity and Corruption Risks in the Hungarian Public Procurement 2009–2015. Proceeding of the Corruption Research Center, Budapest, pp. 1–7.
Whitney, R. E. (1972): Initial Digits for the Sequence of Primes. The American Mathematical Monthly, 79(2): 150–152.
Zhou, W. – Kapoor, G. (2011): Detecting Evolutionary Financial Statement Fraud. Decision Support Systems, 50(3): 570–575.