For political and economic theory in general, libertarianism in particular, property rights are a pillar of central importance. One might describe the schools of political and economic thought solely by their approach to property rights, for example libertarianism as expansive and communism as constrained, with a fair degree of accuracy on the system as a whole.
Despite centuries of property rights philosophy, a fundamental weakness persists that can be most easily seen from a natural science perspective. Property classifications, such as between one's physical body, personal property, and other types of so-called private property, underlie much of the property rights theory, yet these classes are more of a result of technological limitations than philosophical or real economic distinctions.
We demonstrate through a lens of molecular and developmental biology how distinctions between types of property are misguided or illusory. Using the developing human embryo as the most basic example of property acquisition, we show that all subsequent examples of greater property acquisition and its use are fundamentally the same. The point is further developed with other biological examples.
Foundational concepts are of primary importance as their mistake persists through even the most elegant deductions. In order to defend itself from the political and economic attacks, the property rights ethic must be consistent and logical. For this, any artificial or contradictory concepts must be shed.
Bergland, D. (1986): Libertarianism in One Lesson.U.K.: Orpheus Publications.
Bergland, D. (1986): Libertarianism in One Lesson.U.K.: Orpheus Publications.)| false
Block, W. E. (1996): Drug Prohibition, Individual Virtue and Positive Economics. Review of Political Economy, October, 8(4): 433–136. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ abs/10.1080/09538259600000077)| false
Block, W. E. (2009): The Privatization of Roads and Highways: Human and Economic Factors.Auburn, Alabama: The Mises Institute. http://www.amazon.com/Privatization-Roads-And-Highways-Factors/dp/1279887303/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1336605800&sr=1-1; available for free here: http://mises.org/books/roads_web.pdf)| false
Block, W. E. – Wingfield, K. – Whitehead, R. (2003): Re-Evaluating America's Failing Drug Control Laws: A Legal, Philosophical, and Economic Proposal. Oklahoma City Law Review, 28(1): 119 –159. http://184.108.40.206/faculty/Block/Articles%20for%20web/Drug%20control%20Laws.doc)| false
Demsetz, H. (1979): Ethics and Efficiency in Property Rights Systems. In: Rizzo, M. (ed.): Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium: Explorations of Austrian Themes.Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company, pp. 97–116. http://ncachanosky.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/ rizzo-mario-ed-1979-time-uncertainty-and-disequilibrium-exploration-of-austrian-themes.pdf)| false
Obioha, V. – Walter, E. B. (2012): War on Black Men: Arguments for the Legalization of Drugs. Criminal Justice Ethics, 31(2): 106–120. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/073112 9X.2012.719671)| false
Vance, L. (2012): The War on Drugs Is a War on Freedom.Orlando, Fl.: Vance Publications. https://www.amazon.com/War-Drugs-Freedom/dp/0982369751/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1494421483&sr=8-1)| false