This article concerns the changing conditions of fiscal sovereignty within the Eurozone in the context of the evolution of the EU's institutional crisis-management framework during the recent financial crisis. It begins with a method-of-difference approach to compare the dynamics and outcomes of the crisis in the Greek and Hungarian economies, on the basis of their similarly troubled fiscal positions and domestic political environments. On this basis, an argument is made that the outcomes in Greece (i.e. a breakdown in national fiscal sovereignty and severe economic losses) were not an inevitable product of the economic fundamentals, but at least partially attributable to uncertainty about the extent and expedience of financial assistance through the Eurozone's crises management institutions. The European Central Bank's (ECB) 2012 declaration of “unlimited support” for Eurozone governments has done much to calm markets, but has also created an institution with an ambiguous and self-imposed “dual-mandate”. This article concludes that the precedent established by the last crisis has created a fraught situation, leaving the Eurozone without viable options that are both economically efficacious and politically legitimate. Relying on either the ECB or the European Stability Mechanism to manage any future crisis could well provoke a backlash among the Eurozone member states as national fiscal sovereignty is eclipsed by ever-deeper ad hoc financial commitments on the part of the institutions of crisis management.
Please, download the file from HERE.
Please, download the file from HERE.
Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary
E-mail: vanyai.judit@krtk.hu
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- CABELLS Journalytics
- EconLit
- Elsevier GEO Abstracts
- GEOBASE
- Index Copernicus
- International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
- JEL
- Referativnyi Zhurnal
- RePEc
- SCOPUS
- Social Science Citation Index
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
285 |
| Journal Impact Factor | 0,939 |
| Rank by Impact Factor | Economics 326/379 |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
0,646 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
0,740 |
| Journal Citation Indicator | 0,34 |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator | Economics 389/570 |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
15 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,285 |
| Scimago Quartile Score | Economics and Econometrics (Q3) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
1,4 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Economics and Econometrics 436/696 (Q3) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,507 |
| 2020 | |
| Total Cites | 275 |
| WoS | |
| Journal Impact Factor |
0,875 |
| Rank by | Economics 325/377 (Q4) |
| Impact Factor | |
| Impact Factor | 0,534 |
| without | |
| Journal Self Cites | |
| 5 Year | 0,500 |
| Impact Factor | |
| Journal | 0,38 |
| Citation Indicator | |
| Rank by Journal | Economics 347/549 (Q3) |
| Citation Indicator | |
| Citable | 37 |
| Items | |
| Total | 37 |
| Articles | |
| Total | 0 |
| Reviews | |
| Scimago | 13 |
| H-index | |
| Scimago | 0,292 |
| Journal Rank | |
| Scimago | Economics and Econometrics Q3 |
| Quartile Score | |
| Scopus | 225/166=1,4 |
| Scite Score | |
| Scopus | Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3) |
| Scite Score Rank | |
| Scopus | 0,668 |
| SNIP | |
| Days from | 289 |
| submission | |
| to acceptance | |
| Days from | 447 |
| acceptance | |
| to publication |
| 2019 | |
|---|---|
| Total Cites WoS |
212 |
| Impact Factor | 0,914 |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
0,728 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
0,650 |
| Immediacy Index |
0,156 |
| Citable Items |
45 |
| Total Articles |
45 |
| Total Reviews |
0 |
| Cited Half-Life |
3,9 |
| Citing Half-Life |
9,5 |
| Eigenfactor Score |
0,00015 |
| Article Influence Score |
0,052 |
| % Articles in Citable Items |
100,00 |
| Normalized Eigenfactor |
0,01891 |
| Average IF Percentile |
28,437 |
| Scimago H-index |
12 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,439 |
| Scopus Scite Score |
214/165=1,3 |
| Scopus Scite Score Rank |
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,989 |
| Acta Oeconomica | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2023 | Online subsscription: 620 EUR / 750 USD Print + online subscription: 724 EUR / 880 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Acta Oeconomica | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1966 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Magyar Tudományos Akadémia |
| Founder's Address |
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0001-6373 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2659 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2022 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2023 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 2023 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2023 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
| Apr 2023 | 11 | 3 | 4 |
| May 2023 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The system paradigm revisited
Clarification and additions in the light of experiences in the post-socialist region
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory