View More View Less
  • 1 London School of Economics, United Kingdom
  • 2 Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada
  • 3 Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 4 Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

In this paper, we pursue two related research questions. First, we enquire whether state owned enterprises (SOEs) perform better than privately owned firms in a large variety of emerging markets. To test this, we develop a unique dataset using firm-level data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES), resulting in a sample of over 50,000 firms from 57 understudied countries including emerging capitalist, former socialist and state capitalist ones. Our results suggest that SOEs do display productivity advantages over private firms in these understudied economies. Our second research question asks whether the performance of state owned firms in these understudied countries is context specific, namely whether performance depends on the institutional system into which a country is classified. We refer to these systems as configurations. In particular, we are interested in whether state owned firms perform better in “state capitalist” countries including China and Vietnam. We find empirical support for the argument that the “state-led” configuration provides better institutional support for the ownership advantages of SOEs than others.

  • Aguilera, R. V.Crespi-Cladera, R. (2016): Global Corporate Governance: On the Relevance of Firms’ Ownership Structure. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 5057.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Amsden, A. H. (1991): Diffusion of Development: The Late-Industrializing Model and Greater East Asia. American Economic Review, 81(2): 282286.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boardman, A.Vining, A. (1989): Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1): 133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carney, M.Gedajlovic, E., – Yang, X. (2009): Varieties of Asian Capitalism: Toward an Institutional Theory of Asian Enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 361380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carney, M.Duran, P.van Essen, M.Shapiro, D. (2017): Family Firms and National Competitiveness: Does Family Firm Prevalence Matter? Journal of Family Business Strategy online.

    • Export Citation
  • Collier, P. (2007): The Bottom Billion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Estrin, S.Pelletier, A. (2018): Privatization in Developing Countries: What Are the Lessons of Recent Experience? World Bank Economic Review, 33(1): 65102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Estrin, S.Perotin, V. (1991): Does Ownership Always Matter. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1): 5572.

  • Estrin, S.Hanousek, J.Kočenda, E.Svejnar, J. (2009): The Effects of Privatization and Owner ship in Transition Economies. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(3): 699728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans, P. (1995): Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Fainshmidt, S.Judge, W. Q.Aguilera, R. V.Smith, A. (FJAS) (2016): Varieties of Institutional Systems: A Contextual Taxonomy of Understudied Countries. Journal of World Business online

    • Export Citation
  • Friedman, M. (1962): Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Galal, A.Jones, L.Tandon, P.Vogelsang, I. (1994): Welfare Consequences of Selling Public Enterprises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Globerman, S.Shapiro, D. (2002): Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructures. World Development, 30(11): 18991919.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gugler, K.Peev, E.Segalla, E. (2013): The Internal Workings of Internal Capital Markets: Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 20: 5973.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, P. A.Soskice, D. W. (2001): Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Hall, P. A.Thelen, K. (2009): Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1): 734.

  • Hall, M.Weiss, L. (1967): Firm Size and Profitability. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(3): 319331.

  • Hayek, von F. A. (1944): The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.

    • Export Citation
  • Hoskisson, R. E.Wright, M.Filatotchev, I.Peng, M. W. (2013): Emerging Multinationals from Mid-Range Economies: The Influence of Institutions and Factor Markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7): 12951321.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jackson G. Deeg, R. (2008): Comparing Capitalisms: Understanding Institutional Diversity and its Implications for International Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 540561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jomo, K. S. (2008): A Critical Review of the Evolving Privatization Debate. In: Roland, G. (ed.): Privatization: Successes and Failures. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 199–212.

    • Export Citation
  • Khanna, T.Palepu, K. G. (2010): Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution. Harvard Business Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Kolodko, G. (1999): Transition to a Market Economy and Sustained Growth. Implications for the Post-Washington Consensus. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32(3): 233-261.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kolodko, G. (2000): From Shock to Therapy: The Political Economy of Post-socialist Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Kolodko, G. (2018): Socialism, Capitalism, or Chinism? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(4): 285298.

    • Export Citation
  • Kornai, J. (1990): The Road to a Free Economy. Shifting from a Socialist System: The Example of Hungary. New York: W. W. Norton and Budapest: HVG Kiadó.

    • Export Citation
  • Kornai, J. (2016): The Sytem Paradigm Revisited Clarification and Additions in the Light of Experiences in the Post-Socialist Countries. Acta Oeconomica, 66(4): 347569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • La Porta, R. Lopez-de-Silanes, F. (1999): Benefits of Privatization-Evidence from Mexico. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4): 11931242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Megginson, W. (2005): The Financial Economics of Privatization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Megginson, W.Netter, J. (2001): From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization. Journal of Economic Literature 39(2): 321389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moen, Ø. (1999): The Relationship between Firm Size, Competitive Advantages and Export Performance Revisited. International Small Business Journal, 18(1): 5372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Musacchio, A.Lazzarini, S. (2014) Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Musacchio, A.Lazzarini, S. G.Aguilera, R. V. (2015): New Varieties of State Capitalism: Strategic and Governance Implications. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 115131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • North, D. C. (1994): Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review, 84(3): 359368.

  • Nuti, D. M. (2018): The Rise, Fall and Future of Socialism. EACES Conference 2018, Warsaw, Keynote Address.

    • Export Citation
  • Rodrik, D. (2006): Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4): 973987.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider, M. R.Schulze-Bentrop, C.Paunescu, M. (2010): Mapping the Institutional Capital of High-Tech Firms: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis of Capitalist Variety and Export Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 246266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shapiro, D.Globerman, S. (2012): The International Activities and Impacts of State-Owned Enterprises. In: Sauvant, K. P. – Sachs, L. – Wouter, P. F. – Schmit Jongbloed (eds): Sovereign Investment: Concerns and Policy Reactions. Oxford University Press, Chapter 5.

    • Export Citation
  • Shleifer, A.Vishny, R. (1994): Politicians and Firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 46(4): 9951025.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1998): More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus. The 1998 WIDER Annual Lecture, Helsinki, January 1998. Reprinted in Ha-Joon Chang (ed.): The Rebel Within. London: Wimbledon Publishing Company, 2001, pp. 17–56.

    • Export Citation
  • Vickers, J.Yarrow, G. (1988): Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Wade, R. (2003): Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Export Citation
  • Williamson, J. (ed.) (1990): What Washington Means by Policy Reform. In: Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington: Institute for International Economics, Chapter 2.

    • Export Citation
  • World Bank (2011): Understanding the Questionnaire. Available from: https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/~/media/GIAWB/EnterpriseSurveys/Documents/Methodology/Questionnaire-Manual.pdf. (Accessed: 19 October 2017).

    • Export Citation