View More View Less
  • 1 London School of Economics, United Kingdom
  • | 2 Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada
  • | 3 Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • | 4 Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

In this paper, we pursue two related research questions. First, we enquire whether state owned enterprises (SOEs) perform better than privately owned firms in a large variety of emerging markets. To test this, we develop a unique dataset using firm-level data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES), resulting in a sample of over 50,000 firms from 57 understudied countries including emerging capitalist, former socialist and state capitalist ones. Our results suggest that SOEs do display productivity advantages over private firms in these understudied economies. Our second research question asks whether the performance of state owned firms in these understudied countries is context specific, namely whether performance depends on the institutional system into which a country is classified. We refer to these systems as configurations. In particular, we are interested in whether state owned firms perform better in “state capitalist” countries including China and Vietnam. We find empirical support for the argument that the “state-led” configuration provides better institutional support for the ownership advantages of SOEs than others.

  • Aguilera, R. V.Crespi-Cladera, R. (2016): Global Corporate Governance: On the Relevance of Firms’ Ownership Structure. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 5057.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Amsden, A. H. (1991): Diffusion of Development: The Late-Industrializing Model and Greater East Asia. American Economic Review, 81(2): 282286.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boardman, A.Vining, A. (1989): Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1): 133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carney, M.Gedajlovic, E., – Yang, X. (2009): Varieties of Asian Capitalism: Toward an Institutional Theory of Asian Enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 361380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carney, M.Duran, P.van Essen, M.Shapiro, D. (2017): Family Firms and National Competitiveness: Does Family Firm Prevalence Matter? Journal of Family Business Strategy online.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collier, P. (2007): The Bottom Billion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Estrin, S.Pelletier, A. (2018): Privatization in Developing Countries: What Are the Lessons of Recent Experience? World Bank Economic Review, 33(1): 65102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Estrin, S.Perotin, V. (1991): Does Ownership Always Matter. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1): 5572.

  • Estrin, S.Hanousek, J.Kočenda, E.Svejnar, J. (2009): The Effects of Privatization and Owner ship in Transition Economies. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(3): 699728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans, P. (1995): Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Fainshmidt, S.Judge, W. Q.Aguilera, R. V.Smith, A. (FJAS) (2016): Varieties of Institutional Systems: A Contextual Taxonomy of Understudied Countries. Journal of World Business online

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friedman, M. (1962): Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Galal, A.Jones, L.Tandon, P.Vogelsang, I. (1994): Welfare Consequences of Selling Public Enterprises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Globerman, S.Shapiro, D. (2002): Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructures. World Development, 30(11): 18991919.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gugler, K.Peev, E.Segalla, E. (2013): The Internal Workings of Internal Capital Markets: Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 20: 5973.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, P. A.Soskice, D. W. (2001): Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, P. A.Thelen, K. (2009): Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1): 734.

  • Hall, M.Weiss, L. (1967): Firm Size and Profitability. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(3): 319331.

  • Hayek, von F. A. (1944): The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.

  • Hoskisson, R. E.Wright, M.Filatotchev, I.Peng, M. W. (2013): Emerging Multinationals from Mid-Range Economies: The Influence of Institutions and Factor Markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7): 12951321.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jackson G. Deeg, R. (2008): Comparing Capitalisms: Understanding Institutional Diversity and its Implications for International Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 540561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jomo, K. S. (2008): A Critical Review of the Evolving Privatization Debate. In: Roland, G. (ed.): Privatization: Successes and Failures. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 199–212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khanna, T.Palepu, K. G. (2010): Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution. Harvard Business Press.

  • Kolodko, G. (1999): Transition to a Market Economy and Sustained Growth. Implications for the Post-Washington Consensus. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32(3): 233-261.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kolodko, G. (2000): From Shock to Therapy: The Political Economy of Post-socialist Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kolodko, G. (2018): Socialism, Capitalism, or Chinism? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(4): 285298.

  • Kornai, J. (1990): The Road to a Free Economy. Shifting from a Socialist System: The Example of Hungary. New York: W. W. Norton and Budapest: HVG Kiadó.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kornai, J. (2016): The Sytem Paradigm Revisited Clarification and Additions in the Light of Experiences in the Post-Socialist Countries. Acta Oeconomica, 66(4): 347569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • La Porta, R. Lopez-de-Silanes, F. (1999): Benefits of Privatization-Evidence from Mexico. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4): 11931242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Megginson, W. (2005): The Financial Economics of Privatization. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Megginson, W.Netter, J. (2001): From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization. Journal of Economic Literature 39(2): 321389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moen, Ø. (1999): The Relationship between Firm Size, Competitive Advantages and Export Performance Revisited. International Small Business Journal, 18(1): 5372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Musacchio, A.Lazzarini, S. (2014) Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Musacchio, A.Lazzarini, S. G.Aguilera, R. V. (2015): New Varieties of State Capitalism: Strategic and Governance Implications. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 115131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • North, D. C. (1994): Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review, 84(3): 359368.

  • Nuti, D. M. (2018): The Rise, Fall and Future of Socialism. EACES Conference 2018, Warsaw, Keynote Address.

  • Rodrik, D. (2006): Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4): 973987.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider, M. R.Schulze-Bentrop, C.Paunescu, M. (2010): Mapping the Institutional Capital of High-Tech Firms: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis of Capitalist Variety and Export Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 246266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shapiro, D.Globerman, S. (2012): The International Activities and Impacts of State-Owned Enterprises. In: Sauvant, K. P. – Sachs, L. – Wouter, P. F. – Schmit Jongbloed (eds): Sovereign Investment: Concerns and Policy Reactions. Oxford University Press, Chapter 5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shleifer, A.Vishny, R. (1994): Politicians and Firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 46(4): 9951025.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1998): More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus. The 1998 WIDER Annual Lecture, Helsinki, January 1998. Reprinted in Ha-Joon Chang (ed.): The Rebel Within. London: Wimbledon Publishing Company, 2001, pp. 17–56.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vickers, J.Yarrow, G. (1988): Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Wade, R. (2003): Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williamson, J. (ed.) (1990): What Washington Means by Policy Reform. In: Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington: Institute for International Economics, Chapter 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • World Bank (2011): Understanding the Questionnaire. Available from: https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/~/media/GIAWB/EnterpriseSurveys/Documents/Methodology/Questionnaire-Manual.pdf. (Accessed: 19 October 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

The description of the refereeing procedure is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

  • Ádám Török (Chairman) / University of Pannonia; Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Edina Berlinger / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Finance
  • Péter Halmai / Budapest University of Technology and Economics; National University of Public Service
  • Gábor Kézdi / University of Michigan
  • István Kónya / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies, University of Pécs
  • János Köllő / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies
  • István Magas / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of World Economy; University of Physical Education, Department. of Sports and Decision Sciences
 

Advisory Board

  • Ǻslund, Anders
  • Kolodko, Grzegorz
  • Mau, Vladimir
  • Messerlin, Patrick A
  • Nuti, Mario Domenico
  • Wagener, Hans-Jürgen

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Index Copernicus

 

2020  
Total Cites 275
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,875
Rank by Economics 325/377 (Q4)
Impact Factor  
Impact Factor 0,534
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year 0,500
Impact Factor
Journal  0,38
Citation Indicator  
Rank by Journal  Economics 347/549 (Q3)
Citation Indicator   
Citable 37
Items
Total 37
Articles
Total 0
Reviews
Scimago 13
H-index
Scimago 0,292
Journal Rank
Scimago Economics and Econometrics Q3
Quartile Score  
Scopus 225/166=1,4
Scite Score  
Scopus Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank  
Scopus 0,668
SNIP  
Days from  289
sumbission  
to acceptance  
Days from  447
acceptance  
to publication  

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
212
Impact Factor 0,914
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,728
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,650
Immediacy
Index
0,156
Citable
Items
45
Total
Articles
45
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
3,9
Citing
Half-Life
9,5
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00015
Article Influence
Score
0,052
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,01891
Average
IF
Percentile
28,437
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,439
Scopus
Scite Score
214/165=1,3
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,989

 

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Online subsscription: 588 EUR / 732 USD
Print + online subscription: 688 EUR / 860 USD
Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 71
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)