Acta Oeconomica
Volume/Issue:
Volume 70: Issue 4
State-building for the market economy in Eastern Europe
Author:
Paul Hare Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh Campus, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK

Search for other papers by Paul Hare in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Pages:
471–491
Online Publication Date:
01 Dec 2020
Publication Date:
01 Dec 2020
Article Category:
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2020.00032
Keywords:
socialism; capitalism; transition; EU accession; rule of law;
Restricted access

Abstract

Kornai's earlier works embodied the idea that state institutions formed a system with a strong tendency to reproduce itself, and hence to resist minor reforms. Thus, at the end of socialism, huge changes were needed in politics, economics, and the law to build a new system oriented towards the market-type economy, which would again be stable, self-reinforcing and self-sustaining. Transition promoted the development of new states in Eastern Europe that conformed to the Copenhagen criteria for the EU accession. Were we too hasty in thinking that we had succeeded? The new systems are not returning to the previous one, and only in a few areas have the basic norms of a market-type economy been set aside in Hungary or Poland. But concerns arise at the interface between politics, law and economics – to do with the rule of law, the nature and role of the state, and the interactions between parliament, the executive and the judiciary. Unavoidably, there is also an interesting international dimension here, represented by the shift from the Warsaw Pact and CMEA to NATO and the EU. This paper explores these issues in the light of some of Kornai's recent analysis of developments in Hungary, while also drawing on his very insightful earlier works.

  • Arak, P. – Bobiński, A. (2017): Poland: Nations in Transit Report. Washington, DC: Freedom House.

  • Benwell, R. – Gay, O. (2006): The Separation of Powers. Standard Note SN/PC/06053. London: House of Commons Library.

  • Bingham, T. (2010): The Rule of Law. London: Penguin Books.

  • BTI (2016a): Hungary Country Report. Bertelsmann Stiftung.

  • BTI (2016b): Poland Country Report. Bertelsmann Stiftung.

  • Council (2018): Proposal for a Council Decision.

  • Dam, K. W. (2006): The Law-Growth Nexus: The Rule of Law and Economic Development. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

  • De Soto, H. (2000): The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. London: Black Swan Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dewatripont, M. – Roland, G. (1995): The Design of Reform Packages under Uncertainty. American Economic Review, 85(5): 1207–1223.

  • European Commission (2017): Reasoned Proposal in Accordance with Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union Regarding the Rule of Law in Poland: “Proposal for a Council Decision on the Determination of a Clear Risk of a Serious Breach by the Republic of Poland of the Rule of Law”. COM(2017) 835 final, Brussels.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • European Commission (2018): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Modern Budget for a Union that Protects, Empowers and Defends: The Multiannual Financial Framework for 2021–2027. COM(2018) 321 final, Brussels.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • European Commission (2019): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council: Further Strengthening the Rule of Law within the Union: State of Play and Possible Next Steps. COM(2019) 163 final, Brussels.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Freedom House (2018): Freedom in the World 2018. Washington, DC.

  • Grabbe, H. – Lehne, S. (2018): Could an Illiberal Europe Work? Defending EU Values in Poland and Hungary. Brussels: Carnegie Europe. http://carnegieeurope.eu/2017/09/04/defending-eu-values-in-poland-and-hungary-pub-72988.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gradzewicz, M. – Growiec, J. – Kolasa, M. – Postek, Ł. – Strzelecki, P. (2014): Poland’s Exceptional Performance during the World Economic Crisis: New Growth Accounting Evidence. NBP Working Paper, No. 186, Warsaw: Narodowy Bank Polski.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gros, D. – Steinherr, A. (2004): Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Planting the Seeds. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Halmai, G. – Scheppele, K. L. (ed.) (2012): Opinion on Hungary’s New Constitutional Order. Amicus Brief for the Venice Commission on the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law and the Key Cardinal Laws. Council of Europe.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hare, P. (1991): Central Planning. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.

  • Hare, P. (2015): Comment on “Hungary’s U-Turn” by János Kornai. Capitalism and Society, 10(1): 938–963.

  • Hare, P. – Révész, T. (1992): Hungary’s Transition to the Market: The Case against a “Big-Bang”. Economic Policy, 7(14): 227–264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hare, P. – Stoneman, R. (2017): The Evolving Architecture of Europe: Functioning or Dysfunctional for the Twenty-First Century? Comparative Economic Studies, 59(4): 433–471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hartwell, Ch. A. (2016a): Two Roads Diverge: The Transition Experience of Poland and Ukraine. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Hartwell, Ch. A. (2016b): Determinants of Property Rights in Poland and Ukraine: The Polity or Politicians? Journal of Institutional Economics: 1–28, August.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hayek, F. A. (1944): The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945): The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 34(4): 519–530.

  • Hegedűs, D. (2017): Hungary: Nations in Transit Report. Washington, DC: Freedom House.

  • Helsinki (2018): Attacking the Last Line of Defence, Judicial Independence in Hungary in Jeopardy. Hungarian Helsinki Committee. June.

  • IoG (2019): Devolution at 20. London: Institute for Government.

  • Jánossy, F. (1966): The End of the Economic Miracle. Appearance and Reality in Economic Development. White Plains, NY: International Arts and Science Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kornai, J. (1959): Overcentralization in Economic Administration. Oxford: OUP.

  • Kornai, J. (1972): Rush versus Harmonic Growth: Meditation on the Theory and on the Policies of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kornai, J. (1980): The Economics of Shortage. Amsterdam: North Holland.

  • Kornai, J. (2013): Dynamism, Rivalry and the Surplus Economy: Two Essays on the Nature of Capitalism. Oxford: OUP.

  • Kornai, J. (2015): Hungary’s U-Turn’. Expanded version of paper published in Capitalism and Society, vol. 10: Budapest: Corvinus University of Budapest.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kornai, J. (2019): Frankenstein's Moral Responsibility. Acta Oeconomica, 69(4): 485–494.

  • Lendvai, P. (2017): Orbán: Europe’s New Strongman. London: C. Hurst and Co.

  • Lisbon Treaty (2007): http://www.lisbon-treaty.org.

  • Maskin, E. (1996): Theories of the Soft Budget-Constraint. Japan and the World Economy, 8: 125–133.

  • Maskin, E. – Kornai, J. – Roland, G. (2003): Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4): 1095–1136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • OECD (2018): OECD Economic Surveys, Poland 2018. Paris.

  • OLAF (2018): Nineteenth Report of the European Anti-Fraud Office. 1 January to 31 December 2018. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Piroska, D. – Rosta, M. (eds) (2020): The Theories of János Kornai and a Less Known Hungarian Economist, Ferenc Jánossy, on Unbalanced Economic Growth. In: Systems, Institutions and Values in East and West. Engaging with János Kornai's Scholarship. Budapest – New York: Central European University Press, pp. 51–67.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Portes, R. (1991): Introduction. In: The Path of Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. European Economy, Special edition 2. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, pp. 1–15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Robinson, J. A. – Torvik, R. (2009): A Political Economy Theory of the Soft Budget Constraint. European Economic Review, 53(7): 786–798.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rothstein, B. – Varraich, A. (2017): Making Sense of Corruption. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Sargentini, J. (2018): Draft Report on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union: “The Existence of a Clear Risk of a Serious Breach by Hungary of the Values on which the Union is Founded”, 2017/2131(INL). Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Scheppele, K. L. (2012): The Unconstitutional Constitution. New York Times Opinion Pages, January 2 (linked to Paul Krugman's blog, https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.

  • Turley, G. – Luke, P. J. (2011): Transition Economics: Two Decades on. London: Routledge.

  • World Economic Forum (WEF) (2017): The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Geneva.

  • Williamson, C. R. (2010): The Two Sides of de Soto: Property Rights, Land Titling, and Development. In: ChamleeWright, E. (ed.): Annual Proceedings of the Wealth and Well-Being of Nations. Volume 2. Beloit College Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Woodruff, Ch. (2001): Review of de Soto's ‘The Mystery of Capital’. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4): 1215–1223.

  • World Bank (2008): The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development. Washington, DC.

  • World Bank (2017): Doing Business 2018: Reforming to Create Jobs. Washington, DC.

  • Xu, Ch. (2017): Capitalism and Socialism: A Review of Kornai’s ‘Dynamism, Rivalry, and the Surplus Economy’. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1): 191–208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Acta Oeconomica
Acta Oeconomica Periodical of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Print ISSN:
0001-6373
Online ISSN:
1588-2659

Senior editors

Editors-in-Chief: István P. Székely, Dóra Győrffy

Editor(s): Judit Kálmán

Associate Editors

  • Péter Benczúr, Joint Joint Research Center, European Commission
  • Dóra Benedek, International Monetary Fund
  • Balázs Égert, OECD
  • Dániel Prinz, World Bank
  • Rok Spruk, University of Ljubljana, School of Economics and Business, Slovenia

Editorial Board

  • Anders Åslund, Georgetown University and Advisory Council of CASE, USA
  • István Benczes, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary 
  • Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
  • Fabrizio Coricelli, University of Siena, Italy
  • László Csaba, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary and Central European University, Austria
  • Beáta Farkas, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Szeged, Hungary
  • Péter Halmai, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, and National University of Public Service, Hungary
  • Martin Kahanec, Central European University, Austria
  • Michael Landesmann, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (WIIW), Austria
  • Péter Mihályi, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary
  • Debora Revoltella, European Investment Bank

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary
E-mail: judit.kalman@uni-corvinus.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • Index Copernicus
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index

 

2023  
Web of Science  
Journal Impact Factor 0.7
Rank by Impact Factor Q3 (Economics)
Journal Citation Indicator 0.23
Scopus  
CiteScore 1.4
CiteScore rank Q3 (Economics and Econometrics)
SNIP 0.385
Scimago  
SJR index 0.218
SJR Q rank Q4

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 700 EUR / 768 USD
Print + online subscription: 820 EUR / 900 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation		 1966
Volumes
per Year		 1
Issues
per Year		 4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address		 H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address		 H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher		 Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Oct 2024 169 1 1
Nov 2024 80 0 0
Dec 2024 41 0 0
Jan 2025 95 0 0
Feb 2025 95 0 0
Mar 2025 61 0 0
Apr 2025 0 0 0