View More View Less
  • 1 International Trade and Finance Department, Sakarya Business School, Sakarya University, 54050 Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $700.00

Abstract

Many researchers have analysed the factors that cause discrepancies in the mirror trade statistics. However, the conflicting findings of the relatively limited number of studies on the relation between non-tariff measures and misinvoicing make further research in this area necessary. Therefore, our paper aimed to analyse the impact of non-tariff measures on misinvoicing in the context of Turkey's exports to the European Union (EU) between 2008 and 2015. This study tested the possible relationship between them using other measurable variables related to Turkey's exports to the EU of the products to which the non-tariff measures were applied. This has been done by employing the dynamic generalized method of moments (GMM) as well as the quantile regression (QR) models. It was observed that tariffs, along with non-tariff measures, have negative relationship with the misinvoiced amount. Additionally, it is also observed that the transfer price manipulation appears to be a means of corporate tax evasion. This finding aligns with the decrease in reported imports and the decrease in the perceived levels of corruption.

  • Aktaş, Z.Aldan, A.Özmen, M. U. (2014): Import Surveillance and Over-Invoicing Imports: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(4): 360373.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alfaro, L.Chari, A.Kanczuk, F. (2014): The Real Effects of Capital Controls: Financial Constraints, Exporters, and Firm Investment. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 15–16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anson, J.Cadot, O.Olarreaga, M. (2006): Tariff Evasion and Customs Corruption: Does Pre-Shipment Inspection Help? The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1): 126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arellano, M.Bond, S. (1991): Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277297.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arellano, M.Bover, O. (1995): Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1): 2951.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berger, H.Nitsch, V. (2008): Gotcha! A Profile of Smuggling in International Trade. Cesifo Working Paper Series, No. 2475.

  • Blundell, R.Bond, S. (1998): Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1): 115143.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buehn, A.Eichler, S. (2011): Trade Misinvoicing: The Dark Side of World Trade. The World Economy, 34(8): 12631287.

  • Buehn, A.Farzanegan, M. R. (2012): Smuggling around the World: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model. Applied Economics, 44(23): 30473064.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carrère, C.Grigoriou, C. (2015): Can Mirror Data Help to Capture Informal International Trade? Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Research Study Series, No 65.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Celasun, M.Rodrik, D. (1989): Debt, Adjustment, and Growth: Turkey. In: Sachs, J. D.Collins, S. M. (eds): Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance, Volume 3: Country Studies – Indonesia, Korea, Philippines, Turkey .Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 615616.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chalendard, C. R.Raballand, G.Rakotoarisoa, A. (2016): The Use of Detailed Statistical Data in Customs Reform: The Case of Madagascar. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coad, A.Rao, R. (2006): Innovation and Market Value: A Quantile Regression Analysis. Economics Bulletin, 15(13): 110.

  • Deardorff, A. V.Stern, R. M. (1997): Measurement of Non-Tariff Barriers. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 179.

  • Drenski, A.Hallren, R.Lee, J. N. (2019): Tariff Evasion in Global Trade Data. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(7): 829842.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duman, A.Erkin, H. C.Gul, F. (2005): Capital Flight and Capital Controls in Developing Countries . In: Epstein, G. A. (ed.): The Determinants of Capital Flight in Turkey: 1971–2000. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 116142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Economic Development Foundation (2017): The Quota Issue of the Turkish Road Transport Sector in the EU. http://www.ikv.org.tr/images/files/brief(1).pdf. (Accessed November 15, 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eden, L. (2012): Draining Development? Controlling Flows of Illicit Funds from Developing Countries. In: Reuter, P. (ed.): Transfer Price Manipulation. The World Bank, pp. 205233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epaphra, M. (2015): Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from Missing Imports in Tanzania. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(2): 122137.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Farhad, M.Jetter, M.Siddique, A.Williams, A. (2018): Misreported Trade. CESIFO Working Paper Series, No. 7150.

  • Ferrantino, M. J.Liu, X.Wang, Z. (2012): Evasion Behaviors of Exporters and Importers: Evidence from the US – China Trade Data Discrepancy. Journal of International Economics, 86(1): 141157.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferrantino, M. J.Wang, Z. (2008): Accounting for Discrepancies in Bilateral Trade: The Case of China, Hong Kong, and the United States. China Economic Review, 19(3): 502520.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisman, R.Wei, S. J. (2004): Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from “Missing Imports” in China. Journal of Political Economy, 112(2): 471496.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Global Financial Integrity Report (2017): Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2005–2014.

  • Global Financial Integrity Report (2019): Illicit Financial Flows from 148 Developing Countries: 2006–2015.

  • Hamanaka, S. (2012): Whose Trade Statistics Are Correct? Multiple Mirror Comparison Techniques: A Test Case of Cambodia. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 15(1): 3356.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen, L. P. (1982): Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators. Econometrica, 50(4): 10291054.

  • Herrigan, M.Kochen, A.Williams, T. (2005): Analysis of Asymmetries in Intra-Community Trade Statistics with Particular Regard to the Impact of the Rotterdam and Antwerp Effects. Edicom Report, 200453202017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hong, K. P.Pak, S. J. (2017): Estimating Trade Misinvoicing from Bilateral Trade Statistics: The Devil is in the Details. The International Trade Journal, 31(1): 328.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IMF (2011): The Multilateral Aspects of Policies Affecting Capital Flows. http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2011/102111.pdf.

  • Kant, C. (1995): Minority Ownership, Deferral, Perverse Intrafirm Trade and Tariffs. International Economic Journal, 9(1): 1937.

  • Kar, D.Freitas, S. (2012): Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2001–2010. Global Financial Integrity Report .

  • Kar, D.Freitas, S. (2013): Russia: Illicit Financial Flows and the Role of the Underground Economy. Global Financial Integrity Report .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kellenberg, D.Levinson, A. (2019): Misreporting Trade: Tariff Evasion, Corruption, and Auditing Standards. Review of International Economics, 27(1): 106129.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koenker, R.Bassett, G. (1978): Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1): 3350.

  • Lee, Q. V.Rishi, M. (2006): Corruption and Capital Flight: An Empirical Assessment. International Economic Journal, 20(4): 523540.

  • Mahmood, Z. (1997): Determinants of Under-Invoicing of Imports in Pakistan. Journal of International Development, 9(1): 8596.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Makhoul, B.Otterstrom, S. M. (1998): Exploring the Accuracy of International Trade Statistics. Applied Economics, 30(12): 16031616.

  • Nickell, S. (1981): Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, 49(6): 14171426.

  • Nitsch, V. (2012): Draining Development? Controlling Flows of Illicit Funds from Developing Countries . In: Reuter, P. (ed.): Trade Mispricing and Illicit Flows. The World Bank, pp. 309333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nitsch, V. (2016): Trade Misinvoicing in Developing Countries. CGD Policy Paper, No. 103.

  • OECD (2001): Non-Tariff Barriers Threaten Exports from Emerging and Transition Economies. http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/non-tariffbarriersthreatenexportsfromemergingandtransitioneconomies.htm (Accessed December 24, 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Östensson, O. (2018): Misinvoicing in Mineral Trade: What Do We Really Know? Mineral Economics, 31(1–2): 7786.

  • Patnaik, I.Gupta, A. S.Shah, A. (2009): Trade Misinvoicing: A Channel for de facto Capital Account Openness. NIPFP–DEA Program on Capital Flows.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Patnaik, I.Gupta, A. S.Shah, A. (2012): Determinants of Trade Misinvoicing. Open Economies Review, 23(5): 891910.

  • Rahman, S.Aslam, M.Lau, W-Y.Shahari, F. (2015): Does Financial Cooperation Agreement Influence the Real Economy? A GMM Panel Data Approach on ASEAN+3 Countries. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 24(2): 6576.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roodman, D. (2009a): How to Do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1): 86136.

  • Roodman, D. (2009b): A Note on the Theme of too Many Instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1): 135158.

  • Sheikh, M. A. (1974): Underinvoicing of Imports in Pakistan. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 36(4): 287296.

  • Stoyanov, A. (2012): Tariff Evasion and Rules of Origin Violations under the Canada – US Free Trade Agreement. Canadian Journal of Economics, 45(3): 879902.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tandon, S.Rao, R. K. (2017): Trade Misinvoicing: What Can We Measure? NIPFP Working Paper Series, No. 200.

  • The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) (2012): Trade-Based Money Laundering Typologies. http://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/methodsandtrends/documents/trade-basedmoneylaunderingtypologies.html. (Accessed November 7, 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tikhomirov, V. (1997): Capital Flight from Post-Soviet Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 49(4): 591615.

  • Tokdemir, E.Günlük-Senesen, G. (1997): Does Liberalization Reduce Foreign Trade Data Discrepancies? Counterevidence from Turkey, 1970–91. International Review of Applied Economics, 11(2): 287302.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ullah, S.Akhtar, P.Zaefarian, G. (2018): Dealing with Endogeneity Bias: The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for Panel Data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71: 6978.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, E.Moll, T. (1994): Capital Flight from South Africa: Is Underinvoicing Exaggerated? South African Journal of Economics, 62(1): 1728.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yalta, A. Y.Demir, I. (2010): The Extent of Trade Mis-Invoicing in Turkey: Did Post-1990 Policies Matter? Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 31(3): 4166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, D. (2008): Can Enforcement Backfire? Crime Displacement in the Context of Customs Reform in the Philippines. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1): 114.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

The description of the refereeing procedure is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

  • Ádám Török (Chairman) / University of Pannonia; Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Edina Berlinger / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Finance
  • Péter Halmai / Budapest University of Technology and Economics; National University of Public Service
  • István Kónya / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies, University of Pécs
  • János Köllő / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies
  • István Magas / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of World Economy; University of Physical Education, Department. of Sports and Decision Sciences
 

Advisory Board

  • Ǻslund, Anders, Institute of International Economics, Washington (USA)
  • Kolodko, Grzegorz, Kozminski University, Warsaw (Poland)
  • Mau, Vladimir, Academy of National Economy (Russia)
  • Messerlin, Patrick A, Groupe d’Economie Mondiale (France)
  • Saul Estrin, London School of Economics (UK)
  • Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, Europa Universität Viadrina (Germany)

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Index Copernicus

 

2020  
Total Cites 275
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,875
Rank by Economics 325/377 (Q4)
Impact Factor  
Impact Factor 0,534
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year 0,500
Impact Factor
Journal  0,38
Citation Indicator  
Rank by Journal  Economics 347/549 (Q3)
Citation Indicator   
Citable 37
Items
Total 37
Articles
Total 0
Reviews
Scimago 13
H-index
Scimago 0,292
Journal Rank
Scimago Economics and Econometrics Q3
Quartile Score  
Scopus 225/166=1,4
Scite Score  
Scopus Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank  
Scopus 0,668
SNIP  
Days from  289
sumbission  
to acceptance  
Days from  447
acceptance  
to publication  

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
212
Impact Factor 0,914
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,728
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,650
Immediacy
Index
0,156
Citable
Items
45
Total
Articles
45
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
3,9
Citing
Half-Life
9,5
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00015
Article Influence
Score
0,052
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,01891
Average
IF
Percentile
28,437
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,439
Scopus
Scite Score
214/165=1,3
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,989

 

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2021 Online subsscription: 588 EUR / 732 USD
Print + online subscription: 688 EUR / 860 USD
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 600 EUR / 750 USD
Print + online subscription: 704 EUR / 880 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 71
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
May 2021 0 0 0
Jun 2021 85 1 2
Jul 2021 72 1 2
Aug 2021 54 2 2
Sep 2021 74 0 0
Oct 2021 21 1 1
Nov 2021 0 0 0