Authors:
Deniz Koçak Department of Econometrics, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Türkiye

Search for other papers by Deniz Koçak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5893-0564
and
Abdulkerim Çalişkan Department of Public Finance, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, Ankara, Türkiye

Search for other papers by Abdulkerim Çalişkan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-8890
Restricted access

Abstract

Economic freedom is crucial in determining policies for economic performance of nations and monitoring changes in the international economic order. Evaluating economic freedom requires the use of multiple indicators related to each other. Traditional statistical analyses used as an evaluation tool are often constrained by the probability distribution of indicators or sample size. To overcome these shortcomings, this paper uses grey factor analysis (GFA) to evaluate the economic freedom of countries. GFA can be used with multiple interrelated indicators without requirements about the probability distributions or sample size. The absolute degree of grey incidence matrix is used instead of the correlation matrix in factor analysis and GFA integrates the advantages of grey system theory into factor analysis. The analysis covers data for 2010 and 2020 about 20 economic freedom indicators in 36 selected countries. Two factors explain a significant part of the variance for both years. The scores for countries were obtained using the explained variance ratio as a weight. Our results show that GFA provides more accurate results than traditional statistical analyses.

  • Aarhus, J. H.Jakobsen, T. G. (2019): Rewards of Reforms: Can Economic Freedom and Reforms in Developing Countries Reduce the Brain Drain? International Area Studies Review, 22(4): 327347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Amadeo, K. (2021): Germany’s Economy, Its Successes and Challenges. The Balance .https://www.thebalancemoney.com/germany-s-economy-3306346.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aull-Hyde, R.Erdogan, S.Duke, J. M. (2006): An Experiment on the Consistency of Aggregated Comparison Matrices in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1): 290295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balliew, S.Mathews, T.Hall, J. C. (2020): Measuring Economic Freedom: An Alternative Functional Specification and Subsequent Ranking. Applied Economics, 52(14): 15821591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beaulier, S.Elder, R.Han, C.Hall, J. C. (2016): An Ordinal Ranking of Economic Institutions. Applied Economics, 48(26): 24822490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bengoa, M.Sanchez-Robles, B. (2003): Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Freedom and Growth: New Evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3): 529545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berggren, N. (2003): The Benefits of Economic Freedom: A Survey. The Independent Review, 8(2): 193211.

  • Berggren, N.Jordahl, H. (2006): Free to Trust: Economic Freedom and Social Capital. Kyklos, 59(2): 141169.

  • Bjørnskov, C. (2016): Economic Freedom and Economic Crises. European Journal of Political Economy, 45: 1123.

  • Cabello, J. M.Ruiz, F.Pérez-Gladish, B. (2021): An Alternative Aggregation Process for Composite Indexes: An Application to the Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index. Social Indicators Research, 153(2): 443467.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, B. (2012): The Application of the Grey Correlation Method in the Principal Component Analysis. Advanced Engineering Forum, 6–7: 676681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Compton, R. A.Giedeman, D. C.Hoover, G. A. (2014): A Distributional Analysis of the Benefits of Economic Freedom. European Journal of Political Economy, 33: 121133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Grauwe, P.Ji, Y. (2020): Structural Reforms, Animal Spirits, and Monetary Policies. European Economic Review, 124: 129.

  • De Haan, J.Lundström, S.Sturm, J.E. (2006): Market-Oriented Institutions and Policies and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(2): 157191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Haan, J.Sturm, J. E. (2000): On the Relationship between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(2): 215241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Haan, J.Sturm, J. E. (2003): Does More Democracy Lead to Greater Economic Freedom? New Evidence for Developing Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19: 547563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deng, J. (1989): Introduction to Grey Theory System. The Journal of Grey System, 1(1): 124.

  • Dialga, I.Vallée, T. (2021): The Index of Economic Freedom: Methodological Matters. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(3): 529561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doucouliagos, C. (2005): Publication bias in the Economic Freedom and Economic Growth Literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3): 367387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dutta, B. (2021): Understanding the Economy of Switzerland. https://www.analyticssteps.com/blogs/understanding-economy-switzerland.

  • Ekici, T.Koydemir, S. (2014): Social Capital, Government and Democracy Satisfaction, and Happiness in Turkey: A Comparison of Surveys in 1999 and 2008. Social Indicators Research, 118(3): 10311053.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fraser Institute (2022): Economic Freedom. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/economic-freedom/dataset.

  • Gehring, K. (2013): Who Benefits from Economic Freedom? Unraveling the Effect of Economic Freedom on Subjective Well-Being. World Development, 50: 7490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Georgiou, G. C. (2010): Cyprus: Economic Consequences of the Christofias–Talat/Eroglu Plan. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(4): 411424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Golubović, N.Golubović, S. (2020): Rule of Law and Democratic Consolidation in Serbia. Law and Politics, 17(3): 197208.

  • Graafland, J. (2020): When Does Economic Freedom Promote Well Being? On the Moderating Role of Long-Term Orientation. Social Indicators Research, 149(1): 127153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grech, A. G.Micallef, B.Zerafa, S.Grech, A. G. (2016): Diversification and Structural Changes in the Maltese Economy. In: Grech, A. G. (ed.): Understanding the Maltese Economy. Valletta: Central Bank of Malta, pp. 1525.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gwartney, J.Lawson, R. (1997): Economic Freedom of the World: 1997 Report .Fraser Institute.

  • Gwartney, J.Lawson, R.Block, W. (1996): Economic Freedom of the World: 1975–1995. Fraser Institute.

  • Gwartney, J.Lawson, R.Hall, J.Murphy, R. (2022): Economic Freedom of the World: 2022 Annual Report .Fraser Institute.

  • Gwartney, J. D.Lawson, R. A.Holcombe, R. G. (1999): Economic Freedom and the Environment for Economic Growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155(4): 643663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hadsell, L.Jones, A. T. (2020): The Company You Keep: Satisfaction with Life, Economic Freedom, and Preference-Policy Mismatch. Journal of Comparative Economics, 48(3): 642657.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, J. C.Lawson, R. A. (2014): Economic Freedom of the World: An Accounting of the Literature. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1): 119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hatami-Marbini, A.Hekmat, S.Agrell, P. J. (2022): A Strategy-Based Framework for Supplier Selection: A Grey PCA–DEA Approach. Operational Research, 22: 263297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, Y. S.Liao, J. T.Lin, Z. L. (2009): A Study on Aggregation of Group Decisions. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 26(4): 445454.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, M.Xia, T.Chen, Z.Pan, E.Xi, L. (2021): A DEA Integrated Grey Factor Analysis Approach for Efficiency Evaluation and Ranking in Uncertain Systems. Computers – Industrial Engineering, 162: 107681, 113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Islam, M. R. (2018): Wealth Inequality, Democracy and Economic Freedom. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(4): 920935.

  • Johnson, R. A.Wichern, D. W. (1982): Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

  • Kešeljević, A.Spruk, R. (2013a): Endogenous Economic Freedom and the Wealth of Nations: Evidence from a Panel of Countries, 1996–2011. Applied Economics, 45(28): 39523962.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kešeljević, A.Spruk, R. (2013b): Global Distribution and Dynamics of Economic Freedom: Non-Parametric Approach. Economic Modelling, 33: 560571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, S.-F.Fang, Z.-G.Lin, Y. (2006): Study on a New Definition of Degree of Grey Incidence. Journal of Grey System, 9(2): 112115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, S.Lin, Y. (2010): Grey Systems: Theory and Applications. Springer Science – Business Media.

  • Mazziotta, M.Pareto, A. (2013): Methods for Constructing Composite Indices: One for All or All for One? Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, 67(2): 6780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miozzi, V. J.Powell, B. (2023): Measuring Economic Freedom during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Institutional Economics, 19(2): 229250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Molnár, A.Urbanovics, A. (2020): The Role of e-Democracy in Italy and Hungary. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(3): 545560.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murphy, R. H. (2019): Liberalizing, State Building, and Getting to Denmark: Analyzing 21st-Century Institutional Change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15: 933950.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Odugbesan, J. A.Rjoub, H.Ifediora, C. U.Iloka, C. B. (2021): Do Financial Regulations Matters for Sustainable Green Economy: Evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(40): 5664256657.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD – JRC (2008): Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris.

  • Ott, J. (2018): Measuring Economic Freedom: Better without Size of Government. Social Indicators Research, 135(2): 479498.

  • Prados de la Escosura, L. (2016): Economic Freedom in the Long Run: Evidence from OECD Countries (1850–2007). The Economic History Review, 69(2): 435468.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saeedikiya, M.Li, J.Ashourizadeh, S.Temiz, S. (2022): Innovation Affecting Growth Aspirations of Early-Stage Entrepreneurs: Culture and Economic Freedom Matter. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(1): 4564.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, A. (1776/2007): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations .Harriman House Ltd.

  • Spruk, R.Kešeljević, A. (2018): Economic Freedom and Growth across German Districts. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(4): 739765.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stansel, D. (2019): An Economic Freedom Index for US Metropolitan Areas. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 49(1): 4048.

  • Stroup, M. D. (2007): Economic Freedom, Democracy, and Quality of Life. World Development, 35(1): 5266.

  • Tung, C. T.Lee, Y. J. (2010): The Innovative Performance Evaluation Model of Grey Factor Analysis: A Case Study of Listed Biotechnology Corporations in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12): 78447851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Submit Your Manuscript
 
The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

The description of the refereeing procedure is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Mihályi, Péter

Editor(s): Ványai, Judit

Editorial Board

  • Ádám Török (Chairman) / University of Pannonia; Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Edina Berlinger / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Finance
  • Beáta Farkas / Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Szeged
  • Péter Halmai / Budapest University of Technology and Economics; National University of Public Service
  • István Kónya / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies, University of Pécs
  • János Köllő / Institute of Economics Centre for Regional and Economic Studies
  • István Magas / Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of World Economy; University of Physical Education, Department. of Sports and Decision Sciences
 

Advisory Board

  • Ǻslund, Anders, Institute of International Economics, Washington (USA)
  • Kolodko, Grzegorz, Kozminski University, Warsaw (Poland)
  • Mau, Vladimir, Academy of National Economy (Russia)
  • Messerlin, Patrick A, Groupe d’Economie Mondiale (France)
  • Saul Estrin, London School of Economics (UK)
  • Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, Europa Universität Viadrina (Germany)

Corvinus University of Budapest
Department of Economics
Fővám tér 8 Budapest, H-1093, Hungary
E-mail: vanyai.judit@krtk.hu  

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • EconLit
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • GEOBASE
  • Index Copernicus
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • JEL
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • RePEc
  • SCOPUS
  • Social Science Citation Index

 

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
314
Journal Impact Factor 0.8
Rank by Impact Factor

Economics 334/380
TBA

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0.6
5 Year
Impact Factor
0.8
Journal Citation Indicator 0.29
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

Economics 421/581

 

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
18
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.23
Scimago Quartile Score

Economics and Econometrics Q3

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.1
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 521/705 (26th PCTL)
TBA
Scopus
SNIP
0.540

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
285
Journal Impact Factor 0,939
Rank by Impact Factor Economics 326/379
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,646
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,740
Journal Citation Indicator 0,34
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator Economics 389/570
Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
15
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,285
Scimago Quartile Score Economics and Econometrics (Q3)
Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,4
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 436/696 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,507

2020  
Total Cites 275
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,875
Rank by Economics 325/377 (Q4)
Impact Factor  
Impact Factor 0,534
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year 0,500
Impact Factor
Journal  0,38
Citation Indicator  
Rank by Journal  Economics 347/549 (Q3)
Citation Indicator   
Citable 37
Items
Total 37
Articles
Total 0
Reviews
Scimago 13
H-index
Scimago 0,292
Journal Rank
Scimago Economics and Econometrics Q3
Quartile Score  
Scopus 225/166=1,4
Scite Score  
Scopus Economics and Econometrics 392/661 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank  
Scopus 0,668
SNIP  
Days from  289
submission  
to acceptance  
Days from  447
acceptance  
to publication  

2019  
Total Cites
WoS
212
Impact Factor 0,914
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,728
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,650
Immediacy
Index
0,156
Citable
Items
45
Total
Articles
45
Total
Reviews
0
Cited
Half-Life
3,9
Citing
Half-Life
9,5
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00015
Article Influence
Score
0,052
% Articles
in
Citable Items
100,00
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,01891
Average
IF
Percentile
28,437
Scimago
H-index
12
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,439
Scopus
Scite Score
214/165=1,3
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Economics and Econometrics 355/637 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,989

 

Acta Oeconomica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 620 EUR / 750 USD
Print + online subscription: 724 EUR / 880 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Oeconomica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0001-6373 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2659 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Sep 2023 0 0 0
Oct 2023 0 0 0
Nov 2023 0 0 0
Dec 2023 7040 2 4
Jan 2024 1579 7 7
Feb 2024 664 2 2
Mar 2024 0 0 0