This study aims to analyse the time series properties of the unemployment rates in 10 Central and Eastern European countries after joining the European Union. Three types of unit root tests were conducted: (1) linear unit root tests, namely ADF, PP, LM, and RALS-LM tests; (2) LM and RALS-LM unit root tests with two structural breaks; and (3) LM and RALS-LM unit root tests with Fourier function. The results reveal that the hysteresis hypothesis is valid for Bulgaria, Czechia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Slovenia, whereas the structuralist hypothesis is valid for Estonia and Poland. However, the natural rate hypothesis holds only for Slovakia.
Amable, B. − Henry, J. − Lordon, F. − Topol, R. (1993): Unit Root in the Wage-Price Spiral Is Not Hysteresis in Unemployment. Journal of Economic Studies, 20(1/2): 123−135.
Amable, B. − Henry, J. − Lordon, F. − Topol, R. (1994): Strong Hysteresis versus Zero-Root Dynamics. Economics Letters, 44(1-2): 43−47.
Arestis, P. − Mariscal, I. B. F. (1999): Unit Roots and Structural Breaks in OECD Unemployment. Economics Letters, 65(2): 149−156.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M. − Chang, T. − Ranjbar, O. (2018): Testing Hysteresis Effect in US State Unemployment: New Evidence Using a Nonlinear Quantile Unit Root Test. Applied Economics Letters, 25(4): 249−253.
Becker, R. − Enders, W. − Lee, J. (2006): A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3): 381−409.
Blanchard, O. J. − Summers, L. H. (1986): Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1986, vol. 1: 15−90.
Bolat, S. − Tiwari, A. K. − Erdayi, A. U. (2014): Unemployment Hysteresis in the Eurozone Area: Evidences from Nonlinear Heterogeneous Panel Unit Root Test. Applied Economics Letters, 21(8): 536−540.
Brunello, G. (1990): Hysteresis and the Japanese Unemployment Problem: A Preliminary Investigation. Oxford Economic Papers, 42(3): 483−500.
Camarero, M. − Tamarit, C. (2004): Hysteresis vs. Natural Rate of Unemployment: New Evidence for OECD Countries. Economics Letters, 84(3): 413−417.
Cancelo, J. R. (2007): Cyclical Asymmetries in Unemployment Rates: International Evidence. International Advances in Economic Research, 13(3): 334−346.
Chang, T. (2011): Hysteresis in Unemployment for 17 OECD Countries: Stationary Test with a Fourier Function. Economic Modelling, 28(5): 2208−2214.
Chang, T. − Lee, K. C. − Nieh, C. C. − Wei, C. C. (2005): An Empirical Note on Testing Hysteresis in Unemployment for Ten European Countries: Panel SURADF Approach. Applied Economics Letters, 12(14): 881−886.
Christopoulos, D. K. − León-Ledesma, M. A. (2007): Unemployment Hysteresis in EU Countries: What Do We Really Know About It? Journal of Economic Studies, 34(2): 80−89.
Cross, R. − Darby, J. − Ireland, J. − Piscitelli, L. (2005): Hysteresis and Unemployment: A Preliminary Investigation. In: Bertotti, G. – Mayergoyz, I. (eds): The Science of Hysteresis (Vol. 1). San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 667−699.
Cuestas, J. C. − Monfort, M. − Ordóñez, J. (2015): Unemployment Convergence in Central and Eastern European Countries: Driving Forces and Cluster Behaviour. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(1): 259−273.
Enders, W. − Lee, J. (2012): A Unit Root Test Using a Fourier Series to Approximate Smooth Breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74(4): 574−599.
Ewing, J. A. (1881): On the Production of Transient Electric Currents in Iron and Steel Conductors by Twisting Them When Magnetised, or by Magnetising Them When Twisted. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (33).
Friedman, M. (1968): The Role of Monetary Policy. The American Economic Review, 58(1): 1−17.
Furuoka, F. (2014): Are Unemployment Rates Stationary in Asia-Pacific Countries? New Findings from Fourier ADF Test. Economic Research−Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27(1): 34−45.
Gomes, F. − Silva, C. G. D. (2008): Hysteresis vs. Natural Rate of Unemployment in Brazil and Chile. Applied Economics Letters, 15(1): 53−56.
Göcke, M. (2002): Various Concepts of Hysteresis Applied in Economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(2): 167−188.
Gustavsson, M. − Österholm, P. (2006): Hysteresis and Non-Linearities in Unemployment Rates. Applied Economics Letters, 13(9): 545−548.
Hallett, A. H. − Piscitelli, L. (2002): Testing for Hysteresis against Nonlinear Alternatives. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27(2): 303−327.
Im, K. S. − Lee, J. − Tieslau, M. A. (2014): More Powerful Unit Root Tests with Non-Normal Errors. In: Sickles, R. C. − Horrace, W. C. (eds): Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. New York: Springer, pp. 315−342.
Jaeger, A. − Parkinson, M. (1994): Some Evidence on Hysteresis in Unemployment Rates. European Economic Review, 38(2): 329−342.
Kapetanios, G. − Shin, Y. − Snell, A. (2003): Testing for a Unit Root in the Nonlinear STAR Framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2): 359−379.
Krištić, I. R. − Dumančić, L. R. −Arčabić, V. (2019): Persistence and Stochastic Convergence of Euro Area Unemployment Rates. Economic Modelling, 76: 192−198.
Lee, C. F. (2010): Testing for Unemployment Hysteresis in Nonlinear Heterogeneous Panels: International Evidence. Economic Modelling, 27(5): 1097−1102.
Lee, H. − Lee, J. − Im, K. (2015): More Powerful Cointegration Tests with Non-Normal Errors. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 19(4): 397−413.
Lee, J. − Strazicich, M. C. (2003): Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4): 1082−1089.
León-Ledesma, M. A. (2002): Unemployment Hysteresis in the US States and the EU: A Panel Approach. Bulletin of Economic Research, 54(2): 95−103.
Levin, A. − Lin, C. F. (1992): Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Discussion Paper, pp. 92−93, University of California, San Diego.
Li, H. − Park, S. Y. (2018): Testing for a Unit Root in a nonlinear Quantile Autoregression Framework. Econometric Reviews, 37(8): 867−892.
Mayergoyz, I. − Korman, C. (2021): Economic Hysteresis and its Modeling. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3932547. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3932547.
Meng, M. (2013): Three Essays on More Powerful Unit Root Tests with Non-Normal Errors. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama Libraries.
Meng, M. − Im, K. S. − Lee, J. − Tieslau, M. A. (2014): More Powerful LM Unit Root Tests with Non-Normal Errors. In: Sickles, R. C. − Horrace, W. C. (eds): Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. New York: Springer, pp. 343−357.
Meng, M. − Strazicich, M. C. − Lee, J. (2017): Hysteresis in Unemployment? Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests and Tests with Non-Normal Errors. Empirical Economics, 53(4): 1399−1414.
Mitchell, W. F. (1993): Testing for Unit Roots and Persistence in OECD Unemployment Rates. Applied Economics, 25(12): 1489−1501.
Mota, P. R. − Vasconcelos, P. B. (2022): Labour Market Reforms and Employment Hysteresis. Acta Oeconomica, 72(2): 175−194.
Papell, D. H. − Murray, C. J. − Ghiblawi, H. (2000): The Structure of Unemployment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(2): 309−315.
Perron, P. (1989): The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57(6): 1361−1401.
Phelps, E. S. (1994): Structural Slumps: The Modern Equilibrium Theory of Unemployment, Interest, and Assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Piscitelli, L. − Cross, R. − Grinfeld, M. − Lamba, H. (2000): A Test for Strong Hysteresis. Computational Economics, 15: 59−78.
Røed, K. (1996): Unemployment Hysteresis − Macro Evidence from 16 OECD Countries. Empirical Economics, 21(4): 589−600.
Romero-Avila, D. − Usabiaga, C. (2007): Unit Root Tests, Persistence, and the Unemployment Rate of the US States. Southern Economic Journal, 73(3): 698−716.
Song, F. M. − Wu, Y. (1997): Hysteresis in Unemployment Evidence from 48 US States. Economic Inquiry, 35(2): 235−243.
Song, F. M. − Wu, Y. (1998): Hysteresis in Unemployment: Evidence from OECD Countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38(2): 181−192.
Thompson, J. L. (2002): Natural Rate of Unemployment. In: Snowdon, B. – Vane, H. R. (eds): An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ucar, N. − Omay, T. (2009): Testing for Unit Root in Nonlinear Heterogeneous Panels. Economics Letters, 104(1): 5−8.