View More View Less
  • 1 Lab. Physiol. Genetics, Inst. Plant Physiol., Genetics and Bioengineering 45 Timiryazev str., Almaty, 480090, Kazakhstan
  • | 2 Lab. of Plant Growth and Resistance, Institute of Plant Physiology, Genetics and Bioengineering 45 Timiryazev str., Almaty, 480090, Kazakhstan
  • | 3 Lab. Physiol. Genetics, Inst. Plant Physiol., Genetics and Bioengineering 45 Timiryazev str., Almaty, 480090, Kazakhstan
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $692.00

There is little information on interaction between productivity, stability and drought resistance of crop. This problem is very important in Kazakhstan, where the most of the agricultural area is located in arid and semiarid regions. In this context the genotype × environment interaction (GEI) is of major importance to the plant breeders in developing improved drought resistant cultivars. In this study GEI and stability parameters of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) has been determined by field testing at three contrasting environments. The comparison of the performance and stability of the lines L3, L10, L5, L1 indicated that this breeding material tended to display better performance for main of productivity traits and stability for plant grain yield as compared with other RILs and parental forms. There was positive association between high leaf Relative Water Content (RWC), low leaf Relative Water Loss (RWL) and yield stability. Both physiological parameters (RWC and RWL) are good indicators of drought adaptation by wheat genotypes. A comparison of glume pubescent and unpubescent lines has shown close negative correlation for spike RWL and spike RWC of all pubescent RILs (R2= -0.845). So the glume pubescence can be used as a morphological marker and indirect criterion for selection of drought resistant genotypes. As a result several promising lines combining high yield stability and drought resistance has been selected and used in breeding program.

  • Barrs, H. D. and Weatherley, P. E. (1962): A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. - Australian J. Biol. Sci.15: 413-428.

    'A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves ' () 15 Australian J. Biol. Sci. : 413 -428.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Blum, A. (1988): Plant breeding for stress environments. - CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Plant breeding for stress environments. , ().

  • Clarke, J. M. and McCaig, T. N. (1982): Excised leaf water retention capability as an indicator of drought resistance of Triticum genotypes. - Can. J. Plant Sci.62: 571-578.

    'Excised leaf water retention capability as an indicator of drought resistance of Triticum genotypes ' () 62 Can. J. Plant Sci. : 571 -578.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Eberhart, S. A. and Russel, W. A. (1966): Stability parameters for comparing varieties. - Crop Sci.20: 435-440.

    'Stability parameters for comparing varieties ' () 20 Crop Sci. : 435 -440.

  • Jamaux, I., Steinmetz, A. and Belhassen, E. (1997): Looking for molecular and physiological markers of osmotic adjustment in sunflower. - New Phytologist137: 117-127.

    'Looking for molecular and physiological markers of osmotic adjustment in sunflower ' () 137 New Phytologist : 117 -127.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Martin, M. A., Brown, J. H. and Ferguson, H. (1989): Leaf water potential, relative water content, and diffusive resistance as screening techniques for drought resistance in barley. - Agronomy J.81: 100-105.

    'Leaf water potential, relative water content, and diffusive resistance as screening techniques for drought resistance in barley ' () 81 Agronomy J. : 100 -105.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Morgan, J. M. (1984): Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. - Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.35: 299-319.

    'Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants ' () 35 Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. : 299 -319.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Nagy, Z., Tuba, Z., Zsoldos, F. and Erdei, L. (1995): CO2 exchange and water relation responses of maize and sorghum during water and salt stress. - J. Plant Physiol.145: 539-544.

    'CO2 exchange and water relation responses of maize and sorghum during water and salt stress. ' () 145 J. Plant Physiol. : 539 -544.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Schonfeld, M. A., Johnson, R. C., Carver, B. F. and Mornhinweg, D. W. (1988): Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. - Crop Sci.28: 526-531.

    'Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators ' () 28 Crop Sci. : 526 -531.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Yan, W. and Hunt, L. A. (2001): Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. - Crop Sci.41: 19-26.

    'Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario ' () 41 Crop Sci. : 19 -26.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Baker, R. J. (1988): Tests for crossover genotype x environmental interactions. - Can. J. Plant Sci.68: 405-410.

    'Tests for crossover genotype x environmental interactions ' () 68 Can. J. Plant Sci. : 405 -410.

    • Search Google Scholar

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

 

Senior editors

Managing Editors

Editorial Board

  • Gy. BORBÉLY (Debrecen)
  • A. ČARNY (Ljubljana)
  • A. CSERGŐ (Dublin)
  • B. CZÚCZ (Paris)
  • M. HÖHN (Budapest)
  • K. T. KISS (Budapest)
  • A. KUZEMKO (Uman)
  • Z. LOSOSOVÁ (Brno)
  • I. MÁTHÉ (Szeged)
  • E. MIHALIK (Szeged)
  • S. ORBÁN (Eger)
  • R. PÁL (Butte)
  • Gy. PINKE (Mosonmagyaróvár)
  • T. PÓCS (Eger)
  • K. PRACH (České Budejovice)
  • E. S. RAUSCHERT (Cleveland)
  • E. RUPRECHT (Cluj Napoca)
  • G. SRAMKÓ (Debrecen)
  • A. T. SZABÓ (Veszprém)
  • É. SZŐKE (Budapest)
  • B. TOKARSKA-GUZIK (Katowice)
  • B. TÓTHMÉRÉSZ (Debrecen)
  • P. TÖRÖK (Debrecen)

Botta-Dukát, Zoltán
E-mail: botta-dukat.zoltan@okologia.mta.hu

or

Lőkös, László
E-mail: acta@bot.nhmus.hu
Institute: Botanical Department, Hungarian Natural History Museum
Address: Könyves K. krt. 40. H-1097 Budapest, Hungary

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Chemical Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2020  
Scimago
H-index
19
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,417
Scimago
Quartile Score
Plant Science Q2
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
155/89=1,7
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Plant Science 221/445 (Q2)
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 374/647 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,838
Scopus
Cites
260
Scopus
Documents
22
Days from submission to acceptance 127
Days from acceptance to publication 132
Acceptance
Rate
36%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
17
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,404
Scimago
Quartile Score
Plant Science Q2
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
164/91=1,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Plant Science 209/431 (Q2)
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 358/629 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,699
Scopus
Cites
215
Scopus
Documents
23
Acceptance
Rate
30%

 

Acta Botanica Hungarica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2021 Online subsscription: 580 EUR / 724 USD
Print + online subscription: 660 EUR / 824 USD
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 594 EUR / 740 USD
Print + online subscription: 676 EUR / 844 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Botanica Hungarica
Language English
French
German
Russian
Spanish
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1954
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 63
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0236-6495 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2578 (Online)

 

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Apr 2021 2 0 0
May 2021 2 0 0
Jun 2021 0 0 0
Jul 2021 0 0 0
Aug 2021 2 0 0
Sep 2021 4 0 0
Oct 2021 0 0 0