View More View Less
  • 1 Universidad de Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6, Hungría
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $692.00

The subgenus Heteropsychotria was detected and described by Julian Steyermark in the frame of the monographic series of the Botany of the Guyana Highland (Steyermark 1972) and repeatedly in a more illustrated version in the Flora of Venezuela (Steyermark 1974). Within the subgenus he distinguished 13 sections and 31 series. Three sections (Nrs 4, 7 and 11) of the 13 remained without names and descriptions. After the fundamental molecular taxonomic study of Nepokroeff et al. (1999) a publishing activity started producing a number of critical studies separating some sections as valid individual genera. The section Chytropsia has been included into the genus Margaritopsis Ch. Wright (Andersson 2001, Taylor 2005). The section Notopleura regained its generic status according to Bremekamp’s original concept (Taylor 2001). The Mapouria section has been eliminated by the re-establishment of the Carapichea genus (Andersson 2002b, Taylor and Gereau 2013). It has been recently recognised, that the greater part of the species classified by Steyermark into the section Durifolia belongs to the expanded genus Coccochondra (Taylor 2011). The re-consideration of the taxonomic position of the slenderized subgenus Heteropsychotria was begun by C. M. Taylor et al. with the transfer of some Mesoamerican species as late as 2010, although their close relation to the genus Palicourea was emphasised by Nepokroeff et al. (1999). The next step is, that for the second edition of the Rubiáceas de México the Mexican species of Heteropsychotria were transferred into Palicourea (Borhidi 2011), while C. M. Taylor maintained the Mesoamerican ones within the frame of Psychotria (Taylor 2012). Recently C. M. Taylor started to revise the taxonomic position of the South American Heteropsychotria species with a new circumscription and re-description of the section Didymocarpae (Taylor 2014) by the distinction and description of the new section Tricephalium (Taylor 2015) separating from the rest of the section Cephaëlis and by the detailed elaboration of the section Nonatelia in a new concept with enlarged frame (Taylor and Hollowell 2016). For the remained parts of the Steyermark’s system we suggest here the following reconsiderations. The section Heteropsychotria is enlarged by the inclusion of the anonymous section 4 of Steyermark. The greater part of the anonymous section 7, which remained after the exclusion of the Carapichea species, is described as a new section Bracteiflorae with Palicourea caerulea as type. The section Nonatelia is reconsidered and reshaped in a considerably enlarged form by Taylor and Hollowell (2016), while the section Potaroenses remains unchanged. The Pseudocephaëlis section remains without the series Appunianae, which has been included into the section Tricephalium C. M. Taylor. The section Cephaëlis of Steyermark is divided into two sections. The species with terminal, mostly pedunculate inflorescences is separated under a new name Neocephaëlis Borhidi with Palicourea tomentosa (Aubl.) Borhidi, selected as the type species of the section. The other section includes the species of axillary, mostly sessile inflorescences, elevating the series Axillares of Steyermark on section rank and expanding it by the inclusion of the anonymous section 11, with Palicourea axillaris (Aubl.) Borhidi, selected as the type. For the rest of the eliminated Durifolia section a new one is created under the name Cordifoliae Borhidi, while the Oppositiflorae section also must be cancelled, because its type species is Ronabea latifolia Aubl. At last a new section Microphyllae Borhidi is established for the small-leaved xero-tolerant species of the Antilles with Palicourea orientensis Borhidi et Oviedo as type. The review includes more than 220 species.

Recently Taylor has made an attempt to eliminate the subgenus Heteropsychotria Steyerm. and identified it as a synonym of subgenus Palicourea. It cannot be accepted because the two subgenera differ from each other in important morphological and physiological characters.

The subgenus Palicourea is characterised by having brightly coloured odourless, mostly pedicellate and separated flowers with large corollas often curved tube and swollen base containing an appreciable quantity of nectar, protected by a ring of stiff hairs, namely an arranged complex of characters, which are adapted for hummingbird-pollination. The type species is Palicourea guianensis Aubl. In contrast, the subgenus Heteropsychotria is characterised by having generally green to white inflorescences with white greenish or pale yellow fragrance, smaller mostly sessile flowers with corollas of straight short tube without swollen base and inner hairy ring, but with different pubescence in/or above the middle of the inner face of the tube. These arranged set of characters are clearly adapted to the insect-pollination. The type species is Palicourea deflexa (Sw.) Borhidi. Taylor refers to a great variation in some separate characters between the two character complexes presented in the Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana (2004) without mentioning any concrete example. The reality is, that between the two character complexes there is no intermediate taxon.

After having replaced the subgenus Heteropsychotria Steyermark synonymised by Taylor, a new section has been introduced and created, the section Tricephalium (Müll. Arg.) C. M. Taylor, comprising 35 species and classified in Palicourea subgenus Montanae Taylor 1997. It is diagnosed by having “thick-textured leaves with well-developed intersecondary veins that are extensively reticulated and inflorescences with the flowers sessile in small to large heads that are enclosed by well-developed bracts and the fruits pass through a yellow to red immature stage”. Additionally the section is also characterised by stipules that are shortly united around the stem to laminar, bilobed to emarginate, rounded, rounded and denticulate or erose in each side.

Really, the section Tricephalium is problematic in some respect. It is heterogeneous as a taxonomic unit, because it has not a standard set of characters, even not one character existing in all species classified here for the distinction of the whole group. The most common characteristic feature is the texture and venation of the leaves, a vegetative character that may be influenced rather easily by ecological conditions. Moreover, the major part of the species lives in montane valleys of the Andes of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia as isolated local endemics within similar montane habitats. It is unknown, how these characters would react if the individuals of these species got into lowland situation (see: Clausen et al. (1948) on Achillea lanuginosa). It is to be mentioned that similar leaf texture venations occur in some Carapichea and Coccochondra species as well. Another weakness of the section is the superfluous selection of the typical species, the Palicourea triadica (Müll. Arg.) C. M. Taylor being a very scarcely collected and poorly known species is unable to represent a species-rich, diverse section. After a thorough comparative analysis of the descriptions it turns out that the only character combination occurring in every species of the section Tricephalium is the character-set of the subgenus Heteropsychotria. The only exception would be the Palicourea neilii C. M. Taylor that has according the description bright yellow flowers and corolla tube swollen and bent at the base, but in his fig. 1F the corolla tube is straight and narrow at the base. Therefore we get to the conclusion that the section Tricephalium C. M. Taylor is treated here unchanged as a whole, not in the subgenus Montanae C. M. Taylor, but accentuated its taxonomic position in the frame of the subgenus Heteropsychotria Steyerm.

  • Andersson, L. (2001): Margaritopsis (Rubiaceae, Psychotrieae) is a pantropical genus. – Syst. Geogr. Pl. 71: 7385. https://doi.org/10.2307/3668754

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andersson, L. (2002 a): Relationships and generic circumscriptions in the Psychot ria complex (Rubiaceae, Psychotrieae). – Syst. Geogr. Pl. 72: 167202. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/3668767

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andersson, L. (2002 b): Re-establishment of Carapichea (Rubiaceae, Psychotrieae). – Kew Bull. 57: 363374. https://doi.org/10.2307/4111112

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andersson, L. y Rova, J. H. E. (1999): The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae. – Plant Syst. Evol. 214: 161186. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985737

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borhidi, A. (2011): Transfer of the Mexican species of Psychotria subgen. Heteropsychotria to Palicourea based on morphological and molecular evidences. – Acta Bot. Hung. 53: 241250. https://doi.org/10.1556/ABot.53.2011.3-4.4

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borhidi, A. (2012): Rubiáceas de México. Segunda y ampliada edición. – Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 610 pp.

  • Borhidi, A. L. (2015): Some nomenclatural corrections in the Caribbean flora. – Acta Bot. Hung. 57: 279281. https://doi.org/10.1556/034.57.2015.3-4.3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borhidi, A. L. (2017): El subgénero Heteropsychotria (Rubiaceae, Palicoureeae) en Méxi co y Mesoamerica. Acta Bot. Hung. 59: 1323. https://doi.org/10.1556/034.59.2017.1-2.3

  • Borhidi, A., Martínez-Salas, E. & Ramos Álvarez, C. H. (2015): An uncommon pyrene type and two new genera in the neotropical Psychotrieae (Rubiaceae). – Acta Bot. Hung. 57: 241270. https://doi.org/10.1556/034.57.2015.3-4.1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borhidi, A. y Oviedo-Prieto, R. (2015): Correcciones a la taxonomía y nomenclatura del género Psychotria s. l. en las floras de Cuba, La Española y Jamaica. – Acta Bot. Hung. 57: 271278. https://doi.org/10.1556/034.57.2015.3-4.2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borhidi, A. L., Oviedo-Prieto, R. y Fernández-Zequeira, M. (2016): Nuevos resultados de la revisión taxonómica de los géneros Palicourea y Psychotria (Rubiaceae, Psychotrieae) en Cuba. – Acta Bot. Hung. 58: 148. https://doi.org/10.1556/034.58.2016.1-2.1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bremer, B. (2009): A review of molecular phylogenetic studies of Rubiaceae. – Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 96: 426. https://doi.org/10.3417/2006197

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burger, W. C. y Taylor, C. M. (1993): Family 202. Rubiaceae. In: Burger, W. C. (ed.): Flora Costaricensis. – Fieldiana, Bot. n.s. 33: 1333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clausen, J., Keck, D. D. y Hiesey, W. M. (1948): Experimental studies on the nature of species. III: Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea. – Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 581, Washington, D.C.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Delprete, P. and Kirkbride, H. J. (2016): New combinations and new names in Palicourea (Rubiaceae) for species of Psychotria subgenus Heteropsychotria occurring in the Guianas. – J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 10: 409416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dwyer, D. J. (1980 a): Rubiaceae. In: Woodson, R. E., Scheryl, R. W. et al. (eds): Flora of Panama. Part 1. – Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 67 (1): 1256. https://doi.org/10.2307/2398954

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dwyer, D. J. (1980 b): Rubiaceae. In: Woodson, R. E., Scheryl, R. W. et al. (eds): Flora of Panama. Part IX.Family 179. Rubiaceae. Part II. – Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 67 (2): 257522. https://doi.org/10.2307/2398901

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Govaerts, R. (2015): World checklist of Rubiaceae. – Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://apps. kew.org/wcsp

  • Nepokroeff, M., Bremer, B. y Sytsma, K. J. (1999): Reorganization of the genus Psychotria and tribe Psychotrieae (Rubiaceae) inferred from ITS and rbcL sequence data. – Syst. Bot. 24(1): 527. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419383

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petit, E. (1964): Les espèces africaines du genre Psychotria L. Rubiaceae. I. – Bull. Rijksplantentuin (Brussel) 34: 1228. https://doi.org/10.2307/3667213

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piesschaert, F., Robbrecht, E. y Smets, E. (2001): Patterns in pyrenes: the systematic significance of pyrene morphology in Chassalia (Rubiaceae, Psychotrieae) and related genera. – Flora 196: 121131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Razafimandimbison, S. G., Taylor, C. M., Wikström, N., Pailler, T., Khodabandeh, A. y Bremer, B. (2014): Phylogeny and generic limits in the sister tribes Psychotrieae and Palicoureeae (Rubiaceae): evolution of schizocarps in Psychotria and origin of bacterial leaf-nodules of the Malgasy species. – Amer. J. Bot. 101(7): 11021126. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400076

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robbrecht, E. (1988): Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Characteristic features and progressions. Contributions to a new subfamilial classification. – Opera Bot. Belg. 1: 1271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robbrecht, E. (1989 a): Germination slits in Rubiaceae diaspores. – Progr. y Abstr., Flora Males. Symp., Leiden, August, 1989, p. 53.

  • Robbrecht, E. (1989 b): A remarkable new Chazaliella (African Psychotrieae), exemplifying the taxonomic value of pyrene characters in the Rubiaceae. – Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. Nat. Paris, sér. 4, 11: 341345.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruiz Lopez, H. y Pavón, J. (1794): Florae Peruvianae et Chilensis Prodromus. – La Imprenta de Sancha, Madrid.

  • Schnell, R. (1960): Note sur le genre Cephaëlis et le problème de l’évolution parallèle chez les Rubiacées. – Bull. Rijksplantentuin (Brussel) 30: 357373. https://doi.org/10.2307/3667307

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Standley, P. C. (1918–1934): Rubiaceae. North American Flora 32: 1300.

  • Standley, P. C. (1926): Rubiaceae. In: Trees and shrubs of Mexico. – Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 23 : 13491394.

  • Standley, P. C. (1928): New plants from Central America XI. – J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 18: 160169.

  • Standley, P. C. (1930): Studies on American plants IV. – Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 8: 133236.

  • Standley, P. C. (1938): Rubiaceae. In: Flora of Costa Rica. – Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 18: 12641380.

  • Standley, P. C. (1940 a): Studies on American plants X. – Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 22: 101132.

  • Standley, P. C. (1940 b): Studies on American plants XI. – Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 22: 180218.

  • Standley, P. C. y Steyermark, J. A. (1940 a): Studies on Central American plants I. – Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 22: 219322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Standley, P. C. y Steyermark, J. A. (1940 b): Studies on Central American plants II. – Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 22: 358387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Standley, P. C. y Steyermark, J. A. (1947): Studies on Central American plants III. – Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 23: 328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steyermark, J. A. (1972): Rubiaceae. In: Steyermark, J. A., Maguire, B., Wurdack, J. J. et al.: Botany of the Guyana Highland, Part IX. – Mém. New York Bot. Gard. 23 : 227832.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steyermark, J. A. (1974): Rubiaceae. – In: Lasser, T. & Steyermark, J. A. (eds): Flora de Venezuela. Inst. Bot., Caracas, Vol. 9(1–3), 2070 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. (1989): Revision of Palicourea in Mexico and Central America. – Syst. Bot. Monogr. 26: 1102. https://doi.org/10.2307/25027720

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. (2001): Overview of the neotropical genus Notopleura (Rubiaceae, Psychotrieae) with the description of some new species. – Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 88: 478515. https://doi.org/10.2307/3298587

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. (2004): Rubiacearum Americanarum Magna Hama Pars XVI. New species, a new subspecies, and an overlooked species of Psychotria subg. Heteropsychotria from Mexico, Central America, and western South America. – Novon 14(4): 493508.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. (2005): Margaritopsis (Rubiaceae, Psychotrieae) in the Neotropics. – Syst. Geogr. Pl. 75(2): 161177. https://doi.org/10.2307/3668574

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. (2012 a): Palicourea Aubl. – In: Davidse, G., Sousa, M., Knapp, S. & Chiang, F. (eds): Flora Mesoamericana, Vol. 4/2, pp. 163181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. (2012 b): Psychotria L. – In: Davidse, G., Sousa, M., Knapp, S. & Chiang, F. (eds): Flora Mesoamericana, Vol. 4/2, pp. 192241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. (2015 a): Rubiacearum Americanarum Magna Hama Pars XXXIII. The new group Palicoureae sect. Didymocarpae with four new species and two new subspecies (Palicoureeae). – Novon 23(4): 452478. https://doi.org/10.3417/2012003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. (2015 b): Rubiacearum Americanarum Magna Hama Pars XXXIV. The new group Palicourea sect. Tricephalium with eight new species and a new subspecies (Palicoureeae). – Novon 24(1) 5595. https://doi.org/10.3417/2015001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. y Gereau, R. E. (2013): The genus Carapichea (Rubiaceae, Psychotrieae). – Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 99: 100127. https://doi.org/10.3417/2011064

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. y Hollowell, V. C. (2016): Rubiacearum Americanarum Magna Hama Pars XXXV. The new group Palicourea sect. Nonatelia with five new species (Palicoureeae). – Novon 25: 69110. https://doi.org/10.3417/2015012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M. y Lorence, D. H. (1992): Notes on Psychotria subgenus Heteropsychotria (Rubiaceae: Psychotrieae) in Mexico and Northern Central America. – Novon 2: 259266. https://doi.org/10.2307/3391564

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M., Bruniera, C. y Zappi, D. (2015): Taxonomic transfers in Neotropical Psychotrieae: New combinations in Rudgea and Palicourea. – Kew Bull. 70(45): 17.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M., Lorence, D. H. y Gereau, R. E. (2010): Rubiacearum Magna Hama Pars XXV: The nocturnally flowering Psychotria domingensis-Coussarea hondensis group plus three other Mesoamerican Psychotria transfer to Palicourea. – Novon 20(4): 481492. https://doi.org/10.3417/2009124

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. M., Steyermark, J. A., Delprete, P., Persson, C., Costa, C., Vicentini, A. y Cortés, R. (2004): Rubiaceae. – In: Berry, P., Yatskievych, K. & Holst, B. K. (eds): Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana. Vol. 8. Missouri Bot. Gard. Press, St. Louis, pp. 497847.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verdcourt, B. (1976): Rubiaceae (part 1). – In: Polhill, R. M. (ed.): Flora of tropical East Africa. Agents for Overseas Governments and Administration, London, 414 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WCSP (2014): World checklist of selected plant families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://apps.kew.org./wcsp/, accessed 6 December, 2014.

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

 

 

 

Senior editors

Managing Editors

Editorial Board

  • Gy. BORBÉLY (Debrecen)
  • A. ČARNY (Ljubljana)
  • A. CSERGŐ (Dublin)
  • B. CZÚCZ (Paris)
  • M. HÖHN (Budapest)
  • K. T. KISS (Budapest)
  • A. KUZEMKO (Uman)
  • Z. LOSOSOVÁ (Brno)
  • I. MÁTHÉ (Szeged)
  • E. MIHALIK (Szeged)
  • S. ORBÁN (Eger)
  • R. PÁL (Butte)
  • Gy. PINKE (Mosonmagyaróvár)
  • T. PÓCS (Eger)
  • K. PRACH (České Budejovice)
  • E. S. RAUSCHERT (Cleveland)
  • E. RUPRECHT (Cluj Napoca)
  • G. SRAMKÓ (Debrecen)
  • A. T. SZABÓ (Veszprém)
  • É. SZŐKE (Budapest)
  • B. TOKARSKA-GUZIK (Katowice)
  • B. TÓTHMÉRÉSZ (Debrecen)
  • P. TÖRÖK (Debrecen)

Botta-Dukát, Zoltán
E-mail: botta-dukat.zoltan@okologia.mta.hu

or

Lőkös, László
E-mail: acta@bot.nhmus.hu
Institute: Botanical Department, Hungarian Natural History Museum
Address: Könyves K. krt. 40. H-1097 Budapest, Hungary

  • Scopus
  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Chemical Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal

 

2020  
Scimago
H-index
19
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,417
Scimago
Quartile Score
Plant Science Q2
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
155/89=1,7
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Plant Science 221/445 (Q2)
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 374/647 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,838
Scopus
Cites
260
Scopus
Documents
22
Days from submission to acceptance 127
Days from acceptance to publication 132
Acceptance
Rate
36%

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
17
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,404
Scimago
Quartile Score
Plant Science Q2
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Q3
Scopus
Cite Score
164/91=1,8
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Plant Science 209/431 (Q2)
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 358/629 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,699
Scopus
Cites
215
Scopus
Documents
23
Acceptance
Rate
30%

 

Acta Botanica Hungarica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2022 Online subsscription: 594 EUR / 740 USD
Print + online subscription: 676 EUR / 844 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Botanica Hungarica
Language English
French
German
Russian
Spanish
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1954
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0236-6495 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2578 (Online)

 

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Aug 2021 1 1 2
Sep 2021 3 0 0
Oct 2021 8 0 0
Nov 2021 3 2 1
Dec 2021 3 0 0
Jan 2022 1 0 0
Feb 2022 0 0 0