Contributions to molecular phylogeny of lichens 3. •
New monophyletic branches of the Trapeliaceae and Xylariaceae
Authors:
, , , , , , and
Authors:
and
S. Pandey
saumbhavi@gmail.com
S. Pandey
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology Banasthali University P. O. Banasthali Vidyapith Rajasthan, 304022, India
Search for other papers by S. Pandey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. Pandey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
A. Alam
afrozalamsafvi@gmail.com
A. Alam
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology Banasthali University P. O. Banasthali Vidyapith Rajasthan, 304022, India
Search for other papers by A. Alam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. Alam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Genetic relationships among 24 genotypes of Hyophila involuta collected from five different natural populations of Mount Abu (Rajasthan) is analysed using RAPD and SSR markers. Based on efficiency parameters calculated for each marker system such as polymorphic information content (RAPD = 0.34; SSR = 0.66), marker index (RAPD = 2.78; SSR = 2.62) and resolving power (RAPD = 8.13; SSR = 2.23), the RAPD marker system shows higher values for some indices but microsatellites are more accurately reproducible than RAPD. Moreover, in case of the SSR, the average number of alleles was almost twice compared to RAPD. Mean coefficient of genetic differentiation between populations with RAPD was Gst = 0.269, while with SSR marker was Fst = 0.224. The UPGMA cluster analysis assembled genotypes into two main clusters with diverse levels of sub-clustering within the clusters. Also, the Mantel test showed no significant correlation between geographical and genetic distances. The observed moderately high genetic variability can be explained by efficient spore dispersal. Other factors such as reproductive mode, somatic mutation, continuous propagule recruitment and high degree of intermingling have great impact on the level of genetic variability in moss populations.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Alam, A. (2015): Moss flora of India. An updated summary of taxa. – GRIN Verlag, Germany, 194 pp.
-
Agarwal, M., Shrivastava, N. and Padh, H. (2008): Advances in molecular marker tech-niques and their applications in plant sciences. – Plant Cell Rep. 27: 617–631.
-
Boopathi, M. N. (2013): Genetics mapping and marker assisted selection: basics, practice and benefits. – Springer, India.
-
Britton, E. G. (1904): Hyophila, a new genus to the United States. – Bryologist 7(5): 69–71.
-
Buczkowska, K., Sawicki, J., Szczecinska, M., Klama, H., Milewicz, M. and Bączkiewicz, A. B. (2010): Genetic variation in the liverwort Bazzania trilobata inferred from ISSR markers. – J. Bryol. 32: 265–274.
-
Chang, Y. and Graham, S. W. (2011): Inferring the higher-order phylogeny of mosses (Bryo-phyta) and relatives using a large, multigene plastid data set. – Am. J. Bot. 98: 839–849.
-
Cole, C. T. (2003): Genetic variation in rare and common plants. – Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 213–237.
-
Cronberg, N. (2002): Colonization dynamics of the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens on islands in a Baltic land uplift area: reproduction, genet distribution and genetic vari-ation. – J. Ecol. 90: 925–935.
-
Earl, D. A. and Von-Holdt, B. M. (2012): Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing Structure output and implementing the Evanno method. – Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4: 359–361.
-
Engh, I. B. (2012): High genetic variation in the boreal forest moss Hylocomium splendens through its distribution range. – Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 37 pp.
-
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. and Goudet, J. (2005): Detecting the number of clusters of indi-viduals using the software Structure: a simulation study. – Mol. Ecol. 14: 2611–2620.
-
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E. and Quattro, J. M. (1992): Analysis of molecular variance in-ferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mito-chondrial DNA restriction data. – Genetics 131: 479–491.
-
Frahm, J. P. (2012): The phytogeography of European bryophytes. – Bot. Serbica 36: 23–36.
-
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D. and Briscoe, D. A. (2004): A primer of conservation genetics. – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
-
Hutsemékers, V., Risterucci, A. M., Ricca, M., Boles, S., Hardy, O. J., Shaw, A. J. and Van-derpoorten, A. (2008): Identification and characterization of nuclear microsatellite loci in the aquatic moss Platyhypnidium riparioides (Brachytheciaceae). – Mol. Ecol.Resour.8: 1130–1132.
-
Karlin, E. F., Hotchkiss, S. C., Boles, S. B., Stenøien, H. K., Hassel, K., Flatberg, K. I. and Shaw, A. J. (2012): High genetic diversity in a remote island population system: sans sex. – New Phytol. 193: 1088–1097.
-
Kimura, M. and Crow, J. (1964): The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. – Genetics 49: 725–738.
-
Kophimai, Y., Peintinger, M., Werth, S., Conejo, C., Scheidegger, C. and Bergamini, A. (2014): Ploidy level, genetic diversity, and differentiation in two closely related mosses, Scorpidium cossonii and S. revolvens (Calliergonaceae). – J. Bryol. 36: 33–43.
-
Korpelainen, H., Virtanen, V., Kostamo, K. and Karttunen, H. (2008): Molecular evidence shows that the moss Rhytidiadelphus subpinnatus (Hylocomiaceae) is clearly dis-tinct from R. squarrosus. – Mol. Phyl.Evol.48: 372–376.
-
Kumar, A., Mishra, P., Singh, S. C. and Sundaresan, V. (2014): Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergence analysis and conservation management of Justicia ad-hatoda L., a medicinal plant. – Plant Syst. Evol. 300: 1409–1420.
-
Laaka-Lindberg, S., Korpelainen, H. and Pohjamo, M. (2003): Dispersal of asexual prop-agules in bryophytes. – J. Hattori Bot.Lab.93: 319–330.
-
Leonardia, A. A. P., Kumar, P. P. and Tan, B. C. (2006): Development of microsatellite markers for the tropical moss, Acanthorrhynchium papillatum. – Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 396–398.
-
Lewontin, R. C. (1972): The apportionment of human diversity. – Evol. Biol. 6: 381–398.
-
Li, Y., Korol, A., Fahima, T., Bailes, A. and Nevo, E. (2002): Microsatellites: genomic dis-tribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. – Mol. Ecol. 11: 2453–2465.
-
Manju, C. N., Martin, K. P., Sreekumar, V. B. and Rajesh, K. P. (2012): Morphological and molecular differentiation of Aerobryopsis eravikulamensis Manju and Rajesh sp. – nov. (Meteoriaceae: Bryophyta) and closely related taxa of the Western Ghats of In-dia. – Bryologist 115: 42–50.
-
Mantel, N. (1967): The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression ap-proach. –Cancer Res. 27: 209–220.
-
McDaniel, S. F. and Shaw, A. J. (2005): Selective sweeps and intercontinental migration in the cosmopolitan moss Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid. – Mol. Ecol. 14: 1121–1132.
-
Neelamraju, S. and Neeraja, C. N. (2005): Use of anchored (AG) n and (GA) n primers to assess genetic diversity of Indian landraces and varieties of rice. – Curr. Sci. 89: 1371–1381.
-
Nei, M. (1973): Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. – Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 70: 3321–3323.
-
Nevo, E., Beiles, A. and Krugman, T. (1988): Natural selection of allozyme polymorphisms: a microgeographic differentiation in wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides). – Theor. Appl.Genet.75: 529–538.
-
Padmesh, P., Mukunthakumar, S., Vineesh, P. S., Skaria, R., Kumar, K. H. and Krishnan, P. N. (2012): Exploring wild genetic resources of Musa acuminata Colla distributed in the humid forests of southern Western Ghats of peninsular India using ISSR markers. –Plant Cell Rep. 31: 1591–1601.
-
Pandey, S., Sharma, V. and Alam, A. (2016): Potential of microsatellites markers for the genet-ic analysis of bryophytes. – Not. Sci.Biol.8: 37–46.
-
Pandey, S., Alam, A., Chakraborty, D. and Sharma, V. (2018): An improved protocol for genomic DNA isolation from bryophyte species. – Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B 89: 823–831. .
-
Park, Y. J., Lee, J. K. and Kim, N. S. (2009): Simple sequence repeat polymorphisms (SSRPs) for evaluation of molecular diversity and germplasm classification of minor crops. – Molecules 14: 4546–4569.
-
Peakall, R. and Smouse, P. E. (2012): GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. – Population genetic software for teaching and research: an update. – Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539.
-
Powell, W., Morganate, M., Andre, C., Hanafey, M., Vogel, J., Tingey, S. and Rafalski, A. (1996): The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP, SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. –Mol. Breed. 2: 225–238.
-
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. and Donnelly, P. (2000): Inference of population structure us-ing multi locus genotype data. – Genetics 155: 945–959.
-
Provan, J., Soranzo, N., Wilson, N. J., Goldstein, D. B. and Powell, W. A. (1999): Low muta-tion rate for chloroplast microsatellites. – Genetics 153: 943–947.
-
Ricca, M. and Shaw, A. J. (2010): Allopolyploidy and homoploid hybridization in the Sphagnum subsecundum complex (Sphagnaceae: Bryophyta). – Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 99: 135–151.
-
Såstad, S. M., Stenøien, H. K. and Flatberg, K. I. (1999): Species delimitation and relation-ships of the Sphagnum recurvum complex (Bryophyta) as revealed by isozyme and RAPD markers. – Syst. Bot. 24: 95–107.
-
Shaw, A. J. (1991): Ecological genetics, evolutionary constraints and the systematics of bryophytes. In: Cramer, J. (ed.): Advances in bryology. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, pp. 29–74.
-
Shaw, A. J. (2009): Bryophyte species and speciation. In: Goffinet, B. and Shaw, A. J. (eds): Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp. 445–485.
-
Shaw, A. J., Cao, T., Wang, L. S., Flatberg, K. I., Flatberg, B., Shaw, A., Zhou, P., Boles, S. and Terracciano, S. (2008): Genetic variation in three Chinese peat mosses (Sphagnum) based on microsatellite markers, with primer information and analy-sis of ascertainment bias. – Bryologist 111: 271–281.
-
Skotnicki, M. L., Bargagli, R. and Ninham, J. A. (2002): Genetic diversity in the moss Pohlia nutans on geothermal ground of Mount Rittmann, Victoria Land, Antarctica. – Polar Biol. 25: 771–777.
-
Smoot, E. L. and Taylor, T. N. (1986): Structurally preserved fossil plants from Antarctica II: a Permian moss from the Transarctic Mountains. – Am. J.Bot.73: 1683–1691.
-
Spagnuolo, V., Muscariello, L., Cozzolino, S., Castaldo-Cobianchi, R. and Giordano, S. (2007): Ubiquitous genetic diversity in ISSR markers between and within populations of the asexually producing moss Pleurochaete squarrosa. – Plant Ecol. 188: 91–101.
-
Sripaoraya, S., Blackhall, N. W., Marchant, J., Power, J. B., Lowe, K. C. and Davey, M. R. (2001): Relationship in pineapple by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. – Plant Breed. 120: 265–267.
-
Stenøien, H. K. and Såstad, S. M. (2001): Genetic variability in bryophytes: does mating system really matter?. – J. Bryol. 23: 313–318.
-
Stoneburner, A., Wyatt, R. and Odrzykoski, I. J. (1991): Ecological genetics, evolutionary constraints and the systematics of Bryophytes. – In: Cramer, J. (eds): Advances in bryology. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, 27 pp.
-
Travadon, R., Sache, I., Dutech, C. C., Stachowiak, A., Marquer, B. and Bousset, L. (2011): Absence of isolation by distance patterns at the regional scale in the fungal plant path-ogen Leptosphaeria maculans. – Fungal Biol. 115: 649–659.
-
Van Zanten, B. O. and Pócs, T. (1981): Distribution and dispersal of bryophytes. – Adv. Bryol. 1: 479–562.
-
Vander-Velde, B. and Bijlsma, R. (2003): Phylogeography of five Polytrichum species within Europe. – Biol. J. Linn. Soc.78: 203–213.
-
Weeks, A. R., Stoklosa, J. and Hoffmann, A. A. (2016): Conservation of genetic uniqueness of populations may increase extinction likelihood of endangered species: the case of Aus-tralian mammals. – Front. Zool. 13, 31 (2016).
-
Wilson, P. J. and Provan, J. (2003): Effect of habitat fragmentation on levels and patterns of genetic diversity in natural populations of the peat moss Polytrichum commune. – Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Biol. Sci. 270: 881–886.
-
Wolf, A. T., Howe, R. W. and Hamrick, J. L. (2000): Genetic diversity and population structure of the serpentine endemic Calystegia collina (Convolvulaceae) in Northern Cali-fornia. – Am. J.Bot.87: 1138–1146.
-
Wright, S. (1969): Evolution and the genetics of populations II. The theory of gene frequency. – University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
-
Wyatt, R., Stoneburner, A. and Odrzykoski, I. J. (1989): Bryophyte isozymes: systematic and evolutionary implications. In: Soltis, D. E. and Soltis, P (eds): Isozymes in plant biology. Dioscoride Press, Seattle, pp. 221–240.
-
Yeh, F. C., Yang, R. C., Boyle, T. B. J., Ye, Z. H. and Mao, J. X. (1999): POPGENE 3.2, User-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. http://ualberta.ca/wfeyeh.
-
Zargar, S. M., Farhat, S., Mahajan, R., Bhakhri, A. and Sharma, A. (2016): Unraveling the efficiency of RAPD and SSR markers in diversity analysis and population structure estimation in common bean. – Saudi J. Biol.Sci.23: 139–149.
Botta-Dukát, Zoltán
E-mail: botta-dukat.zoltan@okologia.mta.hu
or
Lőkös, László
E-mail: acta@bot.nhmus.hu
Institute: Botanical Department, Hungarian Natural History Museum
Address: Könyves K. krt. 40. H-1097 Budapest, Hungary
- Scopus
- Biological Abstracts
- BIOSIS Previews
- CAB Abstracts
- CABELLS Journalytics
- Chemical Abstracts
- Global Health
- Referativnyi Zhurnal
| 2022 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
24 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0.512 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (Q2) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
2.4 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Plant Science 228/487 (53rd PCTL) Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 350/687 (49th PCTL) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0.854 |
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
not indexed |
| Journal Impact Factor | not indexed |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
not indexed |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
not indexed |
| Journal Citation Indicator | not indexed |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
not indexed |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
23 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,392 |
| Scimago Quartile Score | Plant Science (Q2) Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (Q3) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
2,5 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Plant Science 205/482 (Q2) Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 322/687 (Q2) |
| Scopus SNIP |
1,046 |
| 2020 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
19 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,417 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Plant Science Q2 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Q3 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
155/89=1,7 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
Plant Science 221/445 (Q2) Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 374/647 (Q3) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,838 |
| Scopus Cites |
260 |
| Scopus Documents |
22 |
| Days from submission to acceptance | 127 |
| Days from acceptance to publication | 132 |
| Acceptance Rate |
36% |
| 2019 | |
|---|---|
| Scimago H-index |
17 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,404 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Plant Science Q2 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Q3 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
164/91=1,8 |
| Scopus Cite Score Rank |
Plant Science 209/431 (Q2) Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 358/629 (Q3) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0,699 |
| Scopus Cites |
215 |
| Scopus Documents |
23 |
| Acceptance Rate |
30% |
| Acta Botanica Hungarica | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2023 | Online subsscription: 612 EUR / 740 USD Print + online subscription: 696 EUR / 844 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Acta Botanica Hungarica | |
|---|---|
| Language | English French German Russian Spanish |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1954 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Magyar Tudományos Akadémia |
| Founder's Address |
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 0236-6495 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2578 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2023 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug 2023 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2023 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2023 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| Nov 2023 | 10 | 15 | 0 |
| Dec 2023 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Authors:
, , , , , , , and
Authors:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and
Author:
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory