Investigations on a Neuropteroid Community by Using Different Methods

L. Ábrahám; V. Markó; J. Vas

doi:10.1556/aphyt.38.2003.1-2.21

Jump to Content

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica

Volume/Issue:: Volume 38: Issue 1-2

Investigations on a Neuropteroid Community by Using Different Methods

Authors:

L. Ábrahám

L. Ábrahám Somogy County Museum, Natural History Department H-7400 Kaposvár, P. O. Box 70, Hungary

Search for other papers by L. Ábrahám in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

V. Markó

V. Markó Department of Entomology, BUESPA H-1052 Budapest, P. O. Box 53, Hungary

Search for other papers by V. Markó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

, and

J. Vas

J. Vas Duna-Ipoly National Park, H-1025 Budapest, Szépvölgyi út 162, Hungary

Search for other papers by J. Vas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

View More View Less

Pages:: 199–207

Online Publication Date:: 22 Jul 2005

Publication Date:: 01 Apr 2003

Article Category:: Journal Article

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.1556/aphyt.38.2003.1-2.21

Keywords:: neuropteroidea; neuropteroidea; Raphidioptera; Neuroptera; sampling methods

Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $30.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD $542.00

USD $30.00

Click here to view the full Terms and Conditions

USD $542.00

Click here to view the full Terms and Conditions

To compare the efficiency of collecting methods by structural characterisation of a neuropteroid community the authors carried out an investigation in a commercial apple orchard at Szigetcsép by using three different trapping techniques, Malaise trap, suction trap and light trap. Considering of the individuals of this community, the suction trap seems to be the most useful sampling device outrunning the material caught by light trap and especially those of Malaise trap. During the investigation the suction trap and light trap show the numbers of the species and individuals of Coniopterygidae, Hemerobiidae and Chrysopidae families in a similar way. To record snake flies, Raphidiidae, Malaise trap seems to be the most suitable sampling device while the light trap is the best for sponge flies, Sisyridae. Abundance of Hemerobius humulinus and Wesmaelius subnebulosus was underestimated by Malaise trap compared with the records of suction trap; however Micromus angulatus and Micromus variegatus were overestimated by Malaise trap. Comparing the results of light trap to suction trap Hemerobius humulinus, Wesmaelius subnebulosus and Chrysoperla carnea complex were underrepresented while Micromus angulatus, Micromus variegatus, Chrysopa formosa and Chrysopa phyllochroma were overestimated. Diversity profiles drawn by different sampling techniques show that the diversity of the suction trap samples, except for the beginning of the scale parameter, is significantly (p < 0.01) lower in its total length from the values of light trap and Malaise trap. In the profile of plots of light trap and Malaise trap the diversity of the samples were not different in the species with medium and higher abundance. In conclusion, the sampling techniques used in the ecological investigations can determine the characteristics of neuropteroid communities. These results show that sampling devices have to be chosen cautiously according to the main aims and the interpretation of investigations.

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share Link

Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://akjournals.com/abstract/journals/038/38/1-2/article-p199.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

Collapse
Expand

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica

Print ISSN:: 0238-1249

Online ISSN:: 1588-2691

Editor-in-Chief

Jenő KONTSCHÁN Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

Technical Editor

Ágnes TURÓCI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

Section Editor

K SALÁNKI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

Editorial Board

Z BOZSÓ Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

PE CHETVERIKOV Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia

JX CUI Henan Institute of Science and Technology, China

J FODOR Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

Z IMREI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

BM KAYDAN Çukurova University, Turkey

L KISS University of Southern Queensland, Australia

V MARKÓ Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary

MW NEGM Ibaraki University, Japan

L PALKOVICS Széchenyi István University, Hungary

M POGÁNY Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

D RÉDEI National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan

A TOLSTIKOV University of Tyumen, Russia

J VUTS Rothamsted Research, UK

GQ WANG Guangxi University, China

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
P.O. Box 102
H-1525 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 487 7534
Fax: (36 1) 487 7555
E-mail: acta@atk.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

Biological Abstracts
BIOSIS Previews
CAB Abstracts
CABELLS Journalytics
Chemical Abstracts
Elsevier GEO Abstracts
Globals Health
Referativnyi Zhurnal
SCOPUS
Zoological Abstracts

2023
Scopus
CiteScore	1.1
CiteScore rank	Q4 (Insect Science)
SNIP	0.279
Scimago
SJR index	0.22
SJR Q rank	Q4

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
Publication Model	Hybrid
Submission Fee	none
Article Processing Charge	900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations	40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency	World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts	Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025	Online subsscription: 536 EUR / 590 USD Print + online subscription: 626 EUR / 688 USD
Subscription Information	Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title	Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
Language	English
Size	B5
Year of Foundation	1966
Volumes per Year	1
Issues per Year	2
Founder	Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's Address	H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher	Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's Address	H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible Publisher	Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN	0238-1249 (Print)
ISSN	1588-2691 (Online)