Authors:
K. Hári Corvinus University of Budapest Department of Entomology 29-43 Villányi út H-1118 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by K. Hári in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Pénzes Corvinus University of Budapest Department of Entomology 29-43 Villányi út H-1118 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by B. Pénzes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Jósvai HAS Plant Protection Institute P. O. Box. 102 H-1525 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by J. Jósvai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
I. Holb

Search for other papers by I. Holb in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
I. Szarukán University of Debrecen Centre of Agricultural Sciences P.O. Box 36 H-4015 Debrecen Hungary

Search for other papers by I. Szarukán in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
I. Szólláth University of Debrecen Centre of Agricultural Sciences P.O. Box 36 H-4015 Debrecen Hungary

Search for other papers by I. Szólláth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
I. Vitányi University of Debrecen Centre of Agricultural Sciences P.O. Box 36 H-4015 Debrecen Hungary

Search for other papers by I. Vitányi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Koczor HAS Plant Protection Institute P. O. Box. 102 H-1525 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by S. Koczor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Ladányi Corvinus University of Budapest Department of Mathematics and Informatics 29-43 Villányi út H-1118 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by M. Ladányi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
M. Tóth HAS Plant Protection Institute P. O. Box. 102 H-1525 Budapest Hungary

Search for other papers by M. Tóth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Traps baited with pear ester + acetic acid were capable of monitoring the codling moth although caught fewer specimens than pheromone baited traps. The general flight patterns recorded in pear ester + acetic acid baited traps resembled closely those recorded with pheromone traps. The only aspect in which pear ester + acetic acid baited traps lagged behind was early detection of first moth specimens occurring in the season. The great advantage of traps with pear ester + acetic acid over pheromone traps was that the former caught females in a high percentage. Further studies are needed to determine whether the sex ratio recorded in captures resembles reliably the natural sex ratio of the given population, or it is distorted. It appears that traps baited with pear ester + acetic acid present a useful alternative for monitoring codling moth especially in mating disruption treated orchards where pheromone traps do not work, or in any other situations where for any reason the capture of female codling moths is sought for. The lower efficiency of the pear ester + acetic acid bait can easily be overcome by applying more traps for monitoring at a given site.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Editor-in-Chief

Jenő KONTSCHÁN Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

Technical Editor

Ágnes TURÓCI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary

Section Editor

K SALÁNKI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
 

Editorial Board

Z BOZSÓ Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
PE CHETVERIKOV Saint-Petersburg State University, Russia
JX CUI Henan Institute of Science and Technology, China
J FODOR Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
Z IMREI Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
BM KAYDAN Çukurova University, Turkey
L KISS University of Southern Queensland, Australia
V MARKÓ Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary
MW NEGM Ibaraki University, Japan
L PALKOVICS Széchenyi István University, Hungary
M POGÁNY Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungary
D RÉDEI National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan
A TOLSTIKOV University of Tyumen, Russia
J VUTS Rothamsted Research, UK
GQ WANG Guangxi University, China

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
P.O. Box 102
H-1525 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 487 7534
Fax: (36 1) 487 7555
E-mail: acta@atk.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • Chemical Abstracts
  • Elsevier GEO Abstracts
  • Globals Health
  • Referativnyi Zhurnal
  • SCOPUS
  • Zoological Abstracts

 

 

2024  
Scopus  
CiteScore 1.1
CiteScore rank Q3 (Insect Science)
SNIP 0.311
Scimago  
SJR index 0.188
SJR Q rank Q4

 

2023  
Scopus  
CiteScore 1.1
CiteScore rank Q4 (Insect Science)
SNIP 0.279
Scimago  
SJR index 0.22
SJR Q rank Q4

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge Effective from 1st Feb 2025:
200 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2025 Online subsscription: 536 EUR / 590 USD
Print + online subscription: 626 EUR / 688 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1966
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
2
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia  
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0238-1249 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2691 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Jan 2025 7 1 1
Feb 2025 12 0 0
Mar 2025 9 1 2
Apr 2025 13 0 0
May 2025 3 0 0
Jun 2025 11 0 0
Jul 2025 0 0 0