View More View Less
  • 1 Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Pedagógiai és Pszichológiai Kar Addiktológiai Tanszéki Szakcsoport 1064 Budapest Izabella u. 46.
  • | 2 Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Bridgwater UK
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $116.00

A szerzők tanulmányukban bemutatják a brit mentálhigiénés kutatás támogatási és pályázati rendszer elmúlt években történt jelentős átalakításának főbb eredményeit. Röviden bemutatják az engedélyeztetési eljárás folyamatát, beleértve az etikai engedélyek megszerzésének menetét is. Rövid nemzetközi kitekintést követően, a szerzők kitérnek az újonnan kialakított rendszerrel szerzett kezdeti tapasztalatokra, a szisztéma előnyeire és hátrányaira.

  • Academy of Medical Sciences (2003): Strengthening clinical research. Academy of Medical Sciences, London

  • Bioscience Innovation and Growth Team (2003): Bioscience 2015. Improving national health, increasing national wealth. Department of Trade and Industry, London

  • Blaskó Gy., Kardos G. (2009): Clinical research in Hungary. Infrastructure, organisation, legislation and framework. The situation in 2008. Thérapie, 64 (1): 33–45.

  • Brody, B.A., McCullogh, L.B., Sharp, R.R. (2005): Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 294: 1411–1414.

  • Department of Health (2005): Research governance framework for health and social care. Department of Health, London. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4122427.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Department of Health (2008): Eligibility for inclusion of studies in the NIHR Clinical Research Network Portfolio. Department of Health, London. http://www.ukcrn.org.uk/index/clinical/portfolio_new/P_eligibility/main_ColumnParagraphs/00/document/Eligibility.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Department of Health, Research and Development Directorate (2006): Best research for best health. A new national health research strategy. Department of Health, London. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4127152.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Hackshaw, A., Farrant, H., Bulley, S., Seckl, M.J., Ledermann, J.A. (2008): Setting up non-commercial clinical trials takes too long in the UK: findings from a prospective study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101 (6): 299–304.

  • Howarth, M., Kneafsey, R., Haigh, C. (2008). Centralization and research governance: does it work? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61 (4): 363–372.

  • Kielmann, T., Tierney, A., Porteous, R., Huby, G., Sheikh, A., Pinnock, H. (2007): The Department of Health’s research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100 (5): 234–238.

  • Medical Research Council (2010): Review of mental health research. Report of the Strategic Review Group 2010. Medical Research Council, London. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC_006848 (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Meenaghan, A., O’Herlihya, A., Duranda, M.A., Farra, H., Tullocha, S., Lelliott, P. (2007): A 55 kg paper mountain: The impact of new research governance and ethics processes on mental health services research in England. Journal of Mental Health, 16 (1): 149–155.

  • National Institute for Health Research (2008a): Prioritising patients. The National Institute for Health Research for Patient Benefit Programme. A review of the first three funding competitions. Department of Health, London. http://www.nihr-ccf.org.uk/site/docdatabase/Home_files/RfPBReview.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • National Institute of Health Research (2008b): Transforming health research: the first two years. National Institute for Health Research progress report 2006–2008. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_082170.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • NIHR Clinical Research Network (2010): Activity based funding project.http://www.crncc.nihr.ac.uk/index/networks/comprehensive/clrn_funding/library/mainColumnParagraphs/0/document/SummaryPaper_2010_11.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Walport, M. J. (2004): Final Report. Research for Patient Benefit Working Party, London

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE
Instructions for reviews in Hungarian HERE
 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Adrienne STAUDER

Editor(s): Edit CZEGLÉDI

Editorial Board

  • László Csaba DÉGI (Babeş-Bolyai Tudományegyetem, Kolozsvár, Románia)
  • Zsolt DEMETROVICS (Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest)
  • Barna KONKOLŸ THEGE (Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Canada)
  • Karolina KÓSA (University of Debrecen, Debrecen)
  • Márta NOVÁK (University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada)
  • Bettina PIKÓ (University of Szeged, Szeged)
  • József RÁCZ (Semmelweis University, Budapest; Eötvös University, Budapest)
  • István TIRINGER (University of Pécs, Pécs)

Editorial Correspondence: Czeglédi, Edit
Institute of Behavioural Sciences
Semmelweis University
Nagyvárad tér 4.
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 210 2930 ext. 56151 ---- Fax: (36 1) 210 2955
E-mail: mentalhigiene.pszichoszomatika@gmail.com

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • PsychInfo
  • SCOPUS

 

2020  
Scimago
H-index
11
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,15
Scimago
Quartile Score
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Q4
Psychiatry and Mental Health Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
23/67=0,3
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 57/60 (Q4)
Psychiatry and Mental Health 452/502 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,24
Scopus
Cites
77
Scopus
Documents
14
Days from submission to acceptance 140
Days from acceptance to publication 90

 

2019  
Scimago
H-index
10
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,127
Scimago
Quartile Score
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Q4
Psychiatry and Mental Health Q4
Scopus
Cite Score
26/70=0,4
Scopus
Cite Score Rank
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 59/61 (Q4)
Psychiatry and Mental Health 442/506 (Q4)
Scopus
SNIP
0,135
Scopus
Cites
67
Scopus
Documents
18

 

Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika
Publication Model Online only Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Online subsscription: 96 EUR / 124 USD
Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika
Language English
Hungarian
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2000
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 22
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Végeken Egézséglélektani Alapítvány
Founder's
Address
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary Nagyvárad tér 4.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1419-8126 (Print)
ISSN 1786-3759 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Feb 2021 3 0 0
Mar 2021 0 1 2
Apr 2021 0 0 0
May 2021 2 0 0
Jun 2021 1 0 0
Jul 2021 2 0 0
Aug 2021 2 0 0