View More View Less
  • 1 Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Pedagógiai és Pszichológiai Kar Addiktológiai Tanszéki Szakcsoport 1064 Budapest Izabella u. 46.
  • 2 Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Bridgwater UK
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $116.00

A szerzők tanulmányukban bemutatják a brit mentálhigiénés kutatás támogatási és pályázati rendszer elmúlt években történt jelentős átalakításának főbb eredményeit. Röviden bemutatják az engedélyeztetési eljárás folyamatát, beleértve az etikai engedélyek megszerzésének menetét is. Rövid nemzetközi kitekintést követően, a szerzők kitérnek az újonnan kialakított rendszerrel szerzett kezdeti tapasztalatokra, a szisztéma előnyeire és hátrányaira.

  • Academy of Medical Sciences (2003): Strengthening clinical research. Academy of Medical Sciences, London

  • Bioscience Innovation and Growth Team (2003): Bioscience 2015. Improving national health, increasing national wealth. Department of Trade and Industry, London

  • Blaskó Gy., Kardos G. (2009): Clinical research in Hungary. Infrastructure, organisation, legislation and framework. The situation in 2008. Thérapie, 64 (1): 33–45.

  • Brody, B.A., McCullogh, L.B., Sharp, R.R. (2005): Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 294: 1411–1414.

  • Department of Health (2005): Research governance framework for health and social care. Department of Health, London. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4122427.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Department of Health (2008): Eligibility for inclusion of studies in the NIHR Clinical Research Network Portfolio. Department of Health, London. http://www.ukcrn.org.uk/index/clinical/portfolio_new/P_eligibility/main_ColumnParagraphs/00/document/Eligibility.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Department of Health, Research and Development Directorate (2006): Best research for best health. A new national health research strategy. Department of Health, London. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4127152.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Hackshaw, A., Farrant, H., Bulley, S., Seckl, M.J., Ledermann, J.A. (2008): Setting up non-commercial clinical trials takes too long in the UK: findings from a prospective study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101 (6): 299–304.

  • Howarth, M., Kneafsey, R., Haigh, C. (2008). Centralization and research governance: does it work? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61 (4): 363–372.

  • Kielmann, T., Tierney, A., Porteous, R., Huby, G., Sheikh, A., Pinnock, H. (2007): The Department of Health’s research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100 (5): 234–238.

  • Medical Research Council (2010): Review of mental health research. Report of the Strategic Review Group 2010. Medical Research Council, London. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC_006848 (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Meenaghan, A., O’Herlihya, A., Duranda, M.A., Farra, H., Tullocha, S., Lelliott, P. (2007): A 55 kg paper mountain: The impact of new research governance and ethics processes on mental health services research in England. Journal of Mental Health, 16 (1): 149–155.

  • National Institute for Health Research (2008a): Prioritising patients. The National Institute for Health Research for Patient Benefit Programme. A review of the first three funding competitions. Department of Health, London. http://www.nihr-ccf.org.uk/site/docdatabase/Home_files/RfPBReview.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • National Institute of Health Research (2008b): Transforming health research: the first two years. National Institute for Health Research progress report 2006–2008. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_082170.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • NIHR Clinical Research Network (2010): Activity based funding project. http://www.crncc.nihr.ac.uk/index/networks/comprehensive/clrn_funding/library/mainColumnParagraphs/0/document/SummaryPaper_2010_11.pdf (Letöltve: 2010. VIII. 6.)

  • Walport, M. J. (2004): Final Report. Research for Patient Benefit Working Party, London

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

Instructions for reviews in Hungarian HERE

 

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.157
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 8

Language: Hungarian and English

Founded in 2000
Publication: One volume of four issues annually
Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 21.
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • PsychInfo
  • SCOPUS

 

EndNote style: LINK

 

Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Adrienne Stauder

Editor(s): Edit Czeglédi

Editorial Board

  • Dégi, László Csaba,Babeş-Bolyai Tudományegyetem, Kolozsvár, Románia
  • Demetrovics, Zsolt, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
  • Konkolÿ Thege, Barna - Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care,
    Penetanguishene, Canada
  • Kósa, Karolina, University of Debrecen, Debrecen
  • Novák, Márta, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
  • Pikó, Bettina, University of Szeged, Szeged
  • Rácz, József, Semmelweis University, Budapest
  • Tiringer, István, University of Pécs, Pécs

Editorial Office: Akadémiai Kiadó Zrt.
Address: Prielle Kornélia u. 21–35, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary

Editorial Correspondence: Czeglédi, Edit
Institute of Behavioural Sciences
Semmelweis University
Nagyvárad tér 4.
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 210 2930 ext. 56151 ---- Fax: (36 1) 210 2955
E-mail: mentalhigiene.pszichoszomatika@gmail.com