Authors:
,
,
,
, and
Júlia Martos
Júlia Martos
Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Pszichológiai Intézet, Szeged
Search for other papers by Júlia Martos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Júlia Martos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Viola Sallay
Viola Sallay
Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Pszichológiai Intézet, Szeged
Search for other papers by Viola Sallay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Viola Sallay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Evelin Szabó
Evelin Szabó
Semmelweis Egyetem, Doktori Iskola, Budapest
Search for other papers by Evelin Szabó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Evelin Szabó in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Rita Tóth-Vajna
Rita Tóth-Vajna
Semmelweis Egyetem, Doktori Iskola, Budapest
Search for other papers by Rita Tóth-Vajna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rita Tóth-Vajna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Tamás Martos
Tamás Martos
Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Pszichológiai Intézet, Szeged
Search for other papers by Tamás Martos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tamás Martos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
A stresszel való egyéni megküzdés modelljei mellett mind elméleti, mind gyakorlati szempontból egyre inkább előtérbe kerülnek a megküzdés társas folyamatai. Elméleti összefoglalónkban ezért bemutatjuk a párkapcsolati stressz és megküzdés leírására létrejött különböző modelleket, ezek között a Kapcsolatfókuszú Megküzdési Modellt; a Rendszer- Tranzakciós Modellt; a Fejlődési-Kontextuális Megküzdési Modellt; valamint a Kapcsolati Intimitás Modellt. Az egyes elméleteket annak alapján hasonlítjuk össze, hogy milyen típusú kapcsolati stresszfajtákat integrálnak a modellben, illetve összevetjük az elméletek által leírt különböző megküzdési stratégiákat. Ismertetjük továbbá a diádikus megküzdés empirikus vizsgálatára létrehozott kérdőíves mérőeszközöket és kutatási elrendezéseket, valamint bemutatjuk az egyes elméletek alapján létrehozott gyakorlati, terápiás lehetőségeket is. Összességében megállapíthatjuk, hogy a páros stressz és megküzdés bemutatott modelljei egyrészt jól értelmezhetők a kapcsolati tudomány (relationship science) tágabb elméleti keretében, másrészt megfelelő alapot adnak a gyakorlati alkalmazás számára is.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Bagdy, E., Vetier, A., Csákvári, Zs., Kiss, D., Vargha, A., & Bánsági, P. (2006). Processzometria. Interakciós folyamelemző eljárás a Közös Rorschach próbában. In Bagdy, E. (Szerk.): Pár- és családi kapcsolatok vizsgálata. Budapest: Bölcsész Konzorcium. Letöltve: 2017. 05. 11-én: http://www.webcreator.hu/tankonyv/krv10.html
-
Bajor, A. (2012). A kapcsolati erőforrások szerepe a párkapcsolati kommunikációban. Alkalmazott Pszichológia, 14(4), 31–49.
-
Berg, C.A., Johnson, M.M.S., Meegan, S.P., & Strough, J. (2003). Collaborative problemsolving interactions in young and old married couples. Discourse Processes, 35(1), 33–58.
-
Berg, C.A., Meegan, S.P., Deviney, F.P. (1998). A social-contextual model of coping with everyday problems across the lifespan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(2), 239–261.
-
Berg, C.A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 920–954.
-
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142.
-
Birkley, E.L., Eckhardt, C.I., & Dykstra, R.E. (2016). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, intimate partner violence, and relationship functioning: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 29(5), 397–405.
-
Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47(2), 137–141.
-
Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren. Göttingen: Hogrefe
-
Bodenmann, G. (2007). Dyadic coping and the 3-phase-method in working with couples. In L. VandeCreek (Ed.), Innovations in clinical practice: Focus on group and family therapy (235–252). Sarasota: Professional Resources Press
-
Bodenmann, G. (2008a). Dyadisches Coping Inventar: Test manual [Dyadic Coping Inventory: Test manual]. Bern: Huber
-
Bodenmann, G. (2008b). Dyadic coping and the significance of this concept for prevention and therapy. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 16(3), 108–111.
-
Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Bradbury, T.N., Gmelch, S., & Ledermann, T. (2014). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 408–424.
-
Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3), 485–493.
-
Bodenmann, G., & Randall, A.K. (2012). Common factors in the enhancement of dyadic coping. Behavior Therapy, 43(1), 88–98.
-
Bodenmann, G., Randall, A.K., Falconier, M.K. (2016). Coping in couples: The Systemic Transactional Model (STM). In M.K. Falconier, A.K. Randall, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (5–22). New York: Routledge
-
Coyne, J.C., & Smith, D.A.F. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives’ distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 404–412.
-
Cutrona, C.E., Russell, D.W., & Gardner, K.A. (2005). The relationship enhancement model of social support. In T.A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress – Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (73–95). Washington: American Psychological Association
-
Elliott, G.R., & Eisdorfer, C. (1982). Stress and human health. New York, NY: Springer
-
Falconier, M.K. (2014). Together – a couples’ program to improve communication, coping, and financial management skills: development and initial pilot–testing. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 236–250.
-
Falconier, M.K., Jackson, J.B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42(1), 28–46.
-
Farrell, A.K., & Simpson, J.A. (2017). Effects of relationship functioning on the biological experience of stress and physical health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 49–53.
-
Fiske, V., Coyne, J.C., & Smith, D.A. (1991). Couples coping with myocardial infarction: An empirical reconsideration of the role of overprotectiveness. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(1), 4–20.
-
Giunta, C.T., & Compas, B.E. (1993). Coping in marital dyads: Patterns and associations with psychological symptoms. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(4), 1011–1017.
-
Heinrichs, N., Zimmermann, T., Huber, B., Herschbach, P., Russell, D.W., & Baucom, D.H. (2012). Cancer distress reduction with a couple-based skills training: a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(2), 239–252.
-
Karantzas, G.C., Simpson, J.A., & McCabe, M.P. (2017). Editorial overview: Contemporary insights into the relationships and stress nexus: Contexts, processes and outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, IV–VI.
-
Koranyi, N., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Automatic coping mechanisms in committed relationships: Increased interpersonal trust as a response to stress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 180–185.
-
Lambert J.E. , Hasbun, A., Engh, R., & Holzer, J. (2015). Veteran PTSS and spouse relationship quality: The importance of dyadic coping. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 7(5), 493–499.
-
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55(3), 234–247.
-
Lazarus, R.S., Cohen, J.B. (1977) Environmental Stress. In I. Altman, & J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research, Volume 2 (89–127). New York: Plenum Press
-
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer
-
Manne, S., & Badr, H. (2008). Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer, 112(11), 2541–2555.
-
Manne, S., Ostroff, J., Rini, C., Fox, K., Goldstein, L., & Gara, G. (2004). The interpersonal process model of intimacy: The role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(4), 589–599.
-
Martos, T., Sallay, V., Nistor, M., & Józsa, P. (2012). Párkapcsolati megküzdés és jóllét – a Páros megküzdés Kérdőív magyar változata. Psychiatria Hungarica, 27(6), 446–458.
-
Martos, T., Sallay, V., Tóth-Vajna, R. (2016). Dyadic coping in Hungarian couples. In M.K. Falconier, A.K. Randall, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (170–186). New York: Routledge
-
Matud, M.P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1401–1415.
-
McEwen, B.S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1), 33–44.
-
McEwen, B.S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiological reviews, 87(3), 873–904.
-
McEwen, B.S., & Seeman, T. (1999). Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress: elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 30–47.
-
McLean, L.M., Jones, J.M., Rydall, A.C., Walsh, A., Esplen, M.J., Zimmermann, C., et al. (2008). A couples intervention for patients facing advanced cancer and their spouse caregivers: outcomes of a pilot study. Psycho-Oncology, 17(11), 1152–1156.
-
Meier, C., Bodenmann, G., Mörgeli, H., & Jenewein, J. (2011). Dyadic coping, quality of life, and psychological distress among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and their partners. International Journal of Chronic Pulmonary Disease, 6(1), 583–595.
-
Nelson Goff, B.S., Crow, J.R., Reisbig, A.M.J., & Hamilton, S. (2007). The impact of individual trauma symptoms of deployed soldiers on relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 344–353.
-
Nussbeck, F.W., & Jackson, J.B. (2016). Measuring dyadic coping across cultures. In M.K. Falconier, A.K. Randall, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples Coping with Stress: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (36–53). New York: Routledge
-
O’Brien, T.B., & DeLongis, A. (1996). The Interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: The role of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 775–813.
-
Olson, D.H., Stewart, K.L., Wilson, L.R. (1991). Coping and Stress Profile (CSP). Minneapolis: Life Innovation
-
Pakenham, K.I. (1998). Couple coping and adjustment to multiple sclerosis in care receivercarer dyads. Family Relations, 47(3), 269–277.
-
Ptacek, J.T., Smith, R.E., & Dodge, K.L. (1994). Gender differences in coping with stress: When stressor and appraisals do not differ. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(4), 421–430.
-
Radványi, K. (2013). Legbelső kör: A család: Eltérő fejlődésű vagy krónikus beteg gyermek a családban. Budapest: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó
-
Randall, A.K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 105–115.
-
Regan, T.W., Lambert, S.D., Kelly, B., McElduff, P., Girgis, A., Kayser, K., et al. (2014). Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Education and Counseling, 96(1), 120–127.
-
Reis, H., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (367–389). Chichester: Wiley
-
Reiss, D. (1981). The family’s construction of reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
Revenson, T.A. (1994). Social support and marital coping with chronic illness. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(2), 122–130.
-
Sautter, F.J., Armelie, A.P., Glynn, S.M., & Wielt, D.B. (2011). The development of a couplebased treatment for PTSD in returning veterans. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(1), 63–69.
-
Selye, H. (1976). Forty years of stress research: principal remaining problems and misconceptions. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 115(1), 53–56.
-
Skinner, E.A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 216–269.
-
Slatcher, R.B., & Schoebi, D. (2017). Protective processes underlying the links between marital quality and physical health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 148–152.
-
Topolánszky-Zsindely, K., & Hadházi, É. (2014). A párkapcsolati elégedettség összefüggése a páros megküzdéssel korai fejlesztésre szoruló gyermeket (is) nevelő szülőknél. A Magyar Családterápiás Egyesület XXVIII. Vándorgyűlése, Eger, 2014. április 25–27.
-
Vajna, R. (2010). Párkapcsolati problémák tükröződése terápiás kapcsolatokban és a terápia során bekövetkező változások. Szakdolgozat (BA). Budapest: Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Pszichológiai Intézet
-
Willi, J. (1973). Der Gemeinsame Rorschach Versuch. Diagnostik von Paar- und Gruppenbeziehungen. Bern: Huber
-
Zimmermann, T., Baucom, D.H., Irvin, J.T., & Heinrichs, N. (2015). Cross-country perspectives on social support in couples coping with breast cancer. Frontiers, 4(4), 52–61.
Editorial Correspondence: Czeglédi, Edit
Institute of Behavioural Sciences
Semmelweis University
Nagyvárad tér 4.
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1) 210 2930 ext. 56151 ---- Fax: (36 1) 210 2955
E-mail: mentalhigiene.pszichoszomatika@gmail.com
Indexing and Abstracting Services:
- PsychInfo
- SCOPUS
- CABELLS Journalytics
| 2024 | |
|---|---|
| Scopus | |
| CiteScore | |
| CiteScore rank | |
| SNIP | |
| Scimago | |
| SJR index | 0.128 |
| SJR Q rank | Q4 |
| 2023 | |
|---|---|
| Scopus | |
| CiteScore | 0.6 |
| CiteScore rank | Q4 (Psychiatry and Mental Health) |
| SNIP | 0.149 |
| Scimago | |
| SJR index | 0.141 |
| SJR Q rank | Q4 |
| Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Online Only Hybrid |
| Submission Fee | none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2025 | Online subsscription: 120 EUR / 132 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika | |
|---|---|
| Language | English Hungarian |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
2000 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
4 |
| Founder | Végeken Egészséglélektani Alapítvány |
| Founder's Address |
H-1089 Budapest, Hungary Nagyvárad tér 4. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 1419-8126 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1786-3759 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2024 | 183 | 3 | 4 |
| Jan 2025 | 86 | 3 | 3 |
| Feb 2025 | 119 | 1 | 1 |
| Mar 2025 | 196 | 7 | 9 |
| Apr 2025 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Authors:
, , , , , , , and
Author:
Author:
Authors:
, , , , , , , and
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory