In Budapest, one third of the population lives in large prefabricated housing estates. Therefore, this Modern heritage of the Communist period is one of the key issues of sustainable urban development. The majority of scientific studies on mass housing focus on economic and social aspects, so this research intends to approach the subject from the built-up environment. Taking the people’s needs and Budapest’s specific situation in relation to the challenges of sustainability as a starting point, the paper attempts to use the back-casting method based on social, economic and environmental trends. Defining a theoretically desirable future for this dominant type of urban housing, the analysis works backwards to understand their principal historic turning points. What are the values of large prefabricated housing estates? What were they, and what could they be? How can this modern and open urban form be sustained? What elements of the existing built environment will disappear, and what can be adapted in the transition process? By introducing three different scales — city, neighborhood and building, along with their subcategories – it is possible to recognize the effects of changing socio-economic conditions upon the built context and indicate problem-oriented, locally-minded interventions.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Bakay, Eszter. 2012. Tértagolás kertépítészeti eszközökkel a budapesti lakótelepek szabadterein 1950 és 1990 között. In: Fenntartható fejlődés, élhető régió, élhető települési táj 3. Budapest: Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem.
-
Balla, Regina. 2014. Horizontális hézag - a paneles lakóházak földszintje. Budapest: BME. Available at: http://tdk.bme.hu/EPK/DownloadPaper/Horizontalis-hezag-a-paneles-lakohazak [Accessed 21 March 2015].
-
Benkő, Melinda. 2014. Evaluating Factors in the Image of Housing Estates. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 43(1), 33–36.
-
Csizmady, Adrienne. 2004. A lakótelep. Budapest: Gondolat.
-
Csízy, László. 2012. A mikrostruktúra lehetőségei: Újpalotai közösségfejlesztés. In: Cságoly, Ferenc (ed.) Közösség és építészet. Budapest: BME Építőművészeti Iskola, 75–81.
-
Egedy, Tamás. 2000. The Situation of High-Rise Housing Estates in Hungary. In: Kovács, Zoltán (ed.) Hungary towards the 21st Century – the Human Geography of Transition. Budapest: Studies in geography in Hungary (31), 169–185.
-
European Commission . 2013. Integrated Sustainable Urban Development, Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Available at ttp://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index.cfm/en/information/publications/brochures/2014/integrated-sustainable-urban-development [Accessed 21 March 2015].
-
Fiala, István and Locsmándi, Gábor. 1981. Új lakóterületek belső közlekedési rendszere, Településtudományi Közlemények (30), 42–80.
-
Hrabovszky-Horváth, Sára and Szalay, Zsuzsa. 2014. Environmental Assessment of a Precast Concrete Building Stock in a Time Perspective. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 13(11), 2997–2804.
-
Kissfazekas, Kornélia. 1998. A tulipán-vita. Kortárs építészet, 1(1), (Online), Available at: http://arch.et.bme.hu/arch_old/korabbi_folyam/kortars1.html#4 [Accessed 25 March 2015].
-
Kocsis, János Balázs. 2008. Városfejlesztés és városfejlődés Budapesten 1930–1985. Budapest: Gondolat.
-
Kollányi, Ágoston. (director of the documentary film) 1970. Budapest tegnap, ma és holnap. Budapest: Mafilm. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZTrtXYTD3w [Accessed 13 March 2015].
-
Konrád, György and Szelényi, Iván. 1969. Az új lakótelepek szociológiai problémái. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
-
Körner, Zsuzsa and Nagy, Márta. 2006. Az európai és a magyar telepszerű lakásépítés története 1945-től napjainkig. Budapest: Terc Kiadó.
-
Molnár, Virág. 2013. Building the State: Architecture, Politics, and State Formation in Postwar Central Europe, New York: Routledge.
-
Muliuolytė, Justina. 2013. Rediscovering Large Scale Housing Estates in post Socialist Cities, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 37(1), 51–58.
-
Nagy, Elemér (ed.). 1968. Budapesti újabb lakótelepek városrendezési tervei. Magyar Építőművészet 1968(1), 20–26., (5), 20–35.
-
Orova, Melinda and Reith, András. 2013. Comparison and Evaluation of Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Systems. Munich: PLEA 2013: Sustainable Architecture for a Renewable Future (Online), Available at: http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1169262/1169262.pdf [Accessed 13 March 2015].
-
OTP, 2014. Lakóingatlan értéktérkép 2014/2. (Online), Available at: https://www.otpbank.hu/OTP_JZB/file/Ertekterkep_Lakoingatlan_2014_2.pdf [Accessed 13 March 2015].
-
Polónyi, Károly. 1992. An Architect-Planner on the Peripheries. Budapest: Terc.
-
Preisich, Gábor. 1998. Budapest városépítésének története 1945–1990. Budapest: Műszaki Könyvkiadó.
-
Rudlin, David, Falk, Nicholas and URBED. 1999. Building the 21st Century Home: The Sustainable Urban Neighbourhood. London: Architectural Press.
-
Salat, Serge. 2011. Cities and Forms: on Sustainable Urbanism. Paris: Hermann.
-
Szabó, Julianna. 2012. A települési fenntarthatóság mérése. In: Alföldi, György, ed. Budapest 2050 – a belvárosi tömbök fennmaradási esélyei. Budapest: Terc.
-
Temelová, Jana, Novák, Jakub, Ouredníček, Martin and Puldová, Petra. 2011. Housing Estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism: Various Trajectories and Inner Differentiation, Urban Studies, 48(9).
-
Tosics, Iván. 2004. European Urban Development: Sustainability and the Role of Housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(1), 67–90.
-
Werner, Rietdorf. 1975. Neue Wohngebiete sozialistischer Länder. Berlin: Verlag für Bauwesen
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2020 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2020 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2020 | 13 | 5 | 2 |
| Dec 2020 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2021 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| Feb 2021 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
| Mar 2021 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó
AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory