The aim of the proposed paper is to examine how the poetic text world embodies the idea of a return to the “naïve” perception of the world. The objects of the analysis are two groups of authors – representatives of 20th century Slovak and Bulgarian literature –, which are known in the history of their national literatures as Trnava group and “poets of the city.” The first poetic formation is made up of Ján Ondruš, Ján Stacho, Jozef Mihalkovič, and Ľubomír Feldek, known also as Concretists, the second one consists of Alexander Vutimski, Alexander Gerov, Ivan Peychev, and Valeri Petrov. While the Slovak authors manifested themselves as a poetic group by publishing three manifestos, one of which called We Will Talk about Children’s Literature, the Bulgarian authors were defined as poets of the city post factum by the Bulgarian critics.
The selection of these poetry formations is based on typological affinities between the two specific literary phenomena and the similarities in their national political and social contexts during their genesis. Three basic topics can be found in the works of the representatives of both Trnava group and poets of the city – objective imagery, the motif of childhood, and the image of the city. In the present paper, we focus mainly on the use of objective imagery in the process of returning to childhood, which some of the poets’ texts depict. We also look at one of the main themes in their works, which both literary groups inherit from their antecedents in their literatures – everydayness. In this light, the poets of the city are related to the poetry of the Bulgarian writer Atanas Dalchev, while the Slovak authors follow the path chosen by the Czech poetry group Květen and their concept of “poetry of every day.”
Through a close reading of selected works of the Slovak Trnava group and the Bulgarian “poets of the city”, we look at the process of engaging the senses in poetry. The main texts chosen for the analysis are
A Play for Your Blue Eyes written by Ľubomír Feldek and Tom Thumb by Valeri Petrov. Their poems are based on a return to childhood and sensual concreteness. We examine how the writers stylize the perceived world in opposition to the “ready-made” ideas the socialist realism offers. Both groups of authors choose a new aesthetic formula that roots in portraying the objective world. The topic is represented in light of Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s reflection on the literary use of language.
Bílik René 2000 Ľubomír Feldek. Bratislava, Kalligram.
Bokníková Andrea 2010 K osudom a najmä k prínosom Trnavskej skupiny–konkretistov. Eslavística Complutense 10, 31–55.
Dalchev Atanas Snow. Translated by Roy Macgregor-Hastie. http://www.balkani.eu/indexen.php?b=issue&bb=07102004145119&bbb=07102004145119_08102004154208 [20-06-2024]
Feldek Ľubomír 1958 Bude reč o literatúre pre deti. Mladá tvorba 4, 10.
Feldek Ľubomír 2007 Prekliata Trnavská skupina. Bratislava, Columbus.
Hass Lawrence 2008 Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy. Bloomington–Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
Kundera Milan 1999 The Unbearable Lightness of Being. New York, Perennial Classics.
Marčok Viliam 1964 Analyzujúca metafora mladej slovenskej poézie. Mladá tvorba 10, 30.
Merleau-Ponty Maurice 1960 Signs. Translated by Richard C. McCleary. Evanston, Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty Maurice 1964 Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston, Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty Maurice 1968 The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, Northwestern University Press.
Nabokov Vladimir A Guide to Berlin (1925). https://berlinomagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Nabokov-A-Guide-to-Berlin-1.pdf [20-06-2024]
Petrov Valeri 2004 A Cry from Childhood. Translated by Richard Willbur. In: Moramarco Fred S. –Zolynas Al (eds.): The Poetry of Men’s Lives. An International Anthology. Athens, University of Georgia Press, 58.
Schmalenbach Fritz 1940 The Term Neue Sachlichkeit. The Art Bulletin 22, 3, 161–165.
Slobodníková Kveta–Feldek Ľubomír 2001 Rozhovor na diaľku a na jednu noc, keď nikto nezabúcha(Rozhovor). Bibiana 8, 1, 12–20.
Stanislavová Zuzana 1999 Autenticita a detský aspekt (k poetike modernej a postmodernej detskej literatúry). In: Křivánek Vladimír: Autenticita a literatura. Sborník referátů z literární konference 41. Bezručovy Opavy (16–17. 9. 1998). Opava, Slezské zemské muzeum – Ústav pro českou literaturu – Slezská univerzita, 137–141.
Taneski Zvonko 2008 Metaforické modely obraznosti v poézii Jána Ondruša. Nitra, Logos,.
Wallace Cathrine 1983 The Design of Biographia Literaria. London, Allen & Unwin.
West Shearer 2000 The Visual Arts in Germany, 1890–1937: Utopia and Despair. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Аврамов Димитър 1997 „Новата предметност“ в България. In: Нанев Атанас (съст.) –Филкова Федя (pед.): Усвояване и еманципация. Встъпителни изследвания върху немска култура в България. София, К&М, 255–266.
Бакрачева Албена 1997 „Кръг, изпълнен със неща“. Александър Геров. In: Бакрачева Албена:Заложби на отвореността. София, УИ „Св. Кл. Охридски“. https://liternet.bg/publish/alba/zalozhbi/content.htm [20-06-2024]
Димитрова Ирма 1994 От Homo Ludens до говорещия автомат. Валери Петров и поетите от 40-те. София, УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“.
Кунчев Божидар 2018 Човешката участ в творчеството на Атанас Далчев, Александър Вутимски и Александър Геров. София, Рива.
Наимович Максим 1966 Едно поколение: Иван Пейчев, Веселин Ханчев, Александър Геров, Богомил Райнов, Александър Вутимски, Валери Петров, Божидар Божилов. Пловдив, Хр. Г. Данов.
Петров Валери 1980 Избрани произведения. Том 1. София, Български писател.
Стефанов Петър 2007 Вечният Палечко или за поетическите убежища на зрелостта. LiterNet 93, 8 (23. 08. 2007). https://liternet.bg/publish2/pstefanov/v_petrov.htm [20-06-2024]
Жеков Светлозар 2007 Принципи на предметно-пространствена организация в българската поезия. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/55654252.pdf [20-06-2024]