This article analyses Biblical Aramaic (BA) performatives within a prototype approach. The authors demonstrate that BA performatives largely comply with the crosslinguistic prototype and its grammatical and extra-grammatical features. Crucially, although the two ‘tenses’ used, Suffix Conjugation (SC) and Active Participle (AP), exhibit similar frequency in performatives, they differ in distribution: the performative SC is more conventionalised/archaic/typical of Ezra while the performative AP is more productive/innovative/ typical of Daniel. These differences reflect the gradual replacement of SC by AP in performatives due to the profound advancement of the two ‘tenses’ along their respective grammaticalisation paths: the resultative and imperfective paths.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra 2006. ‘Serial verb constructions in typological perspective.’ In: Alexandra Aikhenvald and Robert M.W. Dixon (eds.) Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1: 1–68.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra 2018. Serial Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Andrason, Alexander 2012. ‘Making it sound–Performative qatal and its explanation.’ Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 12/8: 1–58
Andrason, Alexander 2013. El sistema verbal hebreo en su contexto semí tico: Una visió n diná mica. [The Biblical Hebrew Verbal System in its Semitic Background: A Dynamic Perspective.] Estella: Verbo divino.
Andrason, Alexander 2014. ‘From resultatives to present tenses–Simultaneous path of resultative constructions.’ Italian Journal of Linguistics 26/1: 1–58.
Andrason, Alexander 2016. A Complex System of Complex Predicates: Tense, Taxis, Aspect and Mood in Basse Mandinka from a Grammaticalisation and Cognitive Perspective. (PhD thesis; Stellenbosch University, South Africa)
Andrason, Alexander and Mawande Dlali, 2017. ‘Tense and aspect of performatives in Xhosa.’ South African Journal of African Languages 37/2: 149–161.
Andrason, Alexander, Hornea, Irina and Joubert, Marcus 2019. ‘The Qe TAL form in the Aramaic of Ezra–A grammaticalization perspective.’ Archiv Orientální 87: 59–98.
Andrason, Alexander and Bonsam Koo, 2020. ‘Verbal serialization in Biblical Aramaic.’ Altorientalische Forschungen 47/1: 3–33.
Andrason, Alexander and Juan–Pablo Vita, 2017. ‘The YQTL-Ø “preterite” in Ugaritic.’ Archiv Orientální 85/3: 345−87.
Austin, John 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Azar, Moshe 1995. The Syntax of Mishnaic Hebrew. Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language.
Bary, Corien 2009. Aspect in Ancient Greek. A Semantic Analysis of the Aorist and Imperfective. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.
Bary, Corien 2012. ‘The Ancient Greek tragic aorist revisited.’ Glotta 88: 31–53.
Bauer, Hans and Leander, Pontus 1969 [1927]. Grammatik des Biblisch-Aramäischen. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Bertinetto, Pier 2001. ‘On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: the ‘perfectivetelic’ confusion’. In: Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia and Maria Teresa Guasti (eds.) Semantic Interfaces. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1–177.
Bertinetto, Pier and Alessandro Lenci, 2010. ‘Iterativity vs. habituality (and gnomic imperfectivity).’ Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 9/1: 1–46.
Beyer, Klaus 1986. The Aramaic Language. Its Distribution and Subdivisions. Gö ttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
Bhayro, Siam 2013. ‘On performatives in Aramaic documents.’ Aramaic Studies 11: 47–52.
Brown, Dustan and Marina Chumakina, 2013. ‘What there might be and what there is: An introduction to canonical typology.’ In: Dustan Brown, Marina Chumakina, and Greville Corbett (eds.) Canonical Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–19.
Bybee, Joan 1994. ‘The grammaticalization of zero: Asymmetries in tense and aspect systems.’ In: William Pagliuca (ed.) Perspectives on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 235–254.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bybee, Joan and Östen Dahl 1989. ‘The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World.’ Studies in Language 13/1: 51–103.
Comrie, Bernard 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dahl, Eystein 2008. ‘Performative Sentences and the Morphosyntax-Semantics Interface in Archaic Vedic.’ Journal of South Asian Literature 1/1: 7–27.
Folmer, Louise. 1995. Aramaic Language in the Achaemenid Period. A Study in Linguistic Variation. PhD thesis. Rijks Universiteit Leiden, Netherlands.
Fortuin, Egbert 2019. ‘Universality and language-dependency of tense and aspect: Performatives from a crosslinguistic perspective.’ Linguistic Typology 23/1: 1–58.
Gzella, Holger 2004. Tempus, Aspekt und Modalitä t im Reicharamäischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Gzella, Holger 2007. ‘The use of the participle in the Hebrew Bar Kosiba letters in the light of Aramaic.’ Dead Sea Discoveries 14/1: 90–98.
Gzella, Holger 2011a. ‘Northwest Semitic in general.’ In: Stefan Weninger (ed.) The Semitic Languages. An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 425–451.
Gzella, Holger 2011b. ‘Imperial Aramaic.’ In: Stefan Weninger (ed.) The Semitic Languages. An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 574–586.
Hug, Volker 1993. Altaramäische Grammatik der Texte des 7. und 6. Jh.s v. Chr. Heidelberg: Orientverlag.
Janda, Laura 2015. ‘Cognitive linguistics in the year 2015.’ Cognitive Semantics 1: 131–154.
Kaufman, Steven 2005. ‘Aramaic.’ In: Robert Hetzron (ed.) The Semitic Languages. London: Routledge, 114–130.
Khalil, Aziz and Ernest McCarus 1999. ‘Arabic performative verbs.’ Zeitschrift fü r Arabische Linguistik 36: 7–20.
Kienast, Burkhart 2001. Historische semitische Sprachwissenschaft . Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Kutscher, Edward 1969. ‘Two ‘passive’ constructions in Aramaic in the light of Persian.’ In: Zeev BenHayyim, Aharon Dotan and Gad Sarfatti (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Semitic Studies Held in Jerusalem, 19–23 July 1965. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 132–151.
Lambdin Thomas O. 1971. Introduction to Biblical Hebrew. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.
Li, Tarsee 2009. The Verbal System of the Aramaic of Daniel. Leiden / Boston: Brill.
Mayer, Werner 1976. Untersuchungen zur Formensprache der babylonischen Gebetsbeschwörungen. Rome: Biblical Institute.
McMyler, Benjamin 2011. ‘Believing what the man says about his own feelings.’ In: Martin Gustafsson and Richard Sørli (eds.) The Philosophy of J. L. Austin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114–145.
Meeuwis Michael, Astrid De Vit and Frank Brisard 2015. ‘Performatives and (im)perfective aspect’. In: Abstracts of the 15 th International Pragmatics Conference. Antwerp, Belgium. 26-31 July 2015, 572.
Mishor, Mordechay 1983. The Tense System in Tannaitic Hebrew. (D.Phil. dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
Morrow, Amanda 2017. ‘I hate my spouse: The performative act of divorce in Elephantine Aramaic.’ Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 43/2: 7–25.
Muraoka, Takamitsu and Bezalel Porten 1998. A Grammar of Egyptian Aramaic. Leiden: Brill.
Pardee, Dennis and Robert Whiting 1987. ‘Aspects of epistolary verbal usage in Ugaritic and Akkadian.’ BSOAS 50/1: 1–31.
Pérez Fernández, Miguel 1992. La lengua de los sabios I. Morfosintaxis [The Language of the Wise]. Estella: Verbo Divino.
Procházka, Stephan and Ursula Bsees 2011. ‘Performatives in Arabic administrative speech.’ In: Stefan Procházka, Lucian Reinfandt and Sven Tost (eds.) Official Epistolography and the Language(s) of Power. Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Research Network Imperium & Officium. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 293–300.
Reckendorf, Hermann 1921. Arabische Syntax. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Rogland, Max 1999. ‘A note on performative utterances in Qumran Aramaic’. Revue de Qumrâ n 19: 277–280.
Rogland, Max 2000. ‘The Hebrew “Epistolary Perfect” Revisited.’ Zeitschrift für Althebraistik 13/2: 194–200.
Rogland, Max 2001. ‘Performative Utterances in Classical Syriac.’ Journal of Semitic Studies 46: 243–250.
Rogland, Max 2003a. Alleged Non-past Uses of Qatal in Classical Hebrew. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Rogland, Max 2003b. ‘Remarks on the Aramaic verbal system.’ In: Martin Baasten and Wido van Peursen (eds.) Hamlet on a Hill. Leuven: Peeters, 421–432.
Rosenthal, Franz 1961. A Grammar of Biblical Aramaic. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Sanders, Seth 2004. ‘Performative utterances and divine language in Ugaritic.’ Journal of Near Eastern Studies 63/3: 161–181.
Searle, John 1989. ‘How performatives work.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 12/5: 535–558.
Tavernier, Jan 2018. ‘Multilingualism in the Elamite Kingdoms and the Achaemenid Empire.’ In: Jens Braarvig and Markham Geller (eds.) Multilingualism, Lingua Franca and Lingua Sacra. Jena/Berlin: Edition Open Access / Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge, 307–320.
Tropper, Josef 2012. Ugaritische Grammatik. 2 ed. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.
Weninger, Stefan 2000. ‘On performatives in classical Ethiopic.’ Journal of Semitic Studies 45: 91–102.
Wright, William 1964. A Grammar of the Arabic Language. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.