View More View Less
  • 1 Romanian Academy, Bucharest
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $648.00

We address the ongoing debate between raising and in-situ analyses of relative superlatives. We present some arguments in favor of the in-situ analysis of DP-internal relative superlatives: first, the in-situ analysis accounts straightforwardly for the use of the definite article; we show that a recent attempt to explain the use of THE under the raising analysis makes incorrect predictions. Secondly, there is evidence that only a sub-type of relative superlatives, that have certain peculiar properties, rely on raising; crucially, these superlatives lack the definite article. This divide among relative superlatives has first been proposed by Pancheva & Tomaszewicz (2012) for certain adnominal superlatives. We add another context which supports this divide — the predicative context, where relative superlatives which can only be interpreted by raising to the vicinity of the correlate can be found. Based on new data coming from Romanian, we show that these predicative superlatives have different properties from DP-internal relative superlatives, which can be explained if the former involve raising and the latter are interpreted DP-internally.

  • Beaver, David. 2001. Presupposition and assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bowers, John. 1969. Surface structure interpretation in English superlatives. Manuscript. MIT.

  • Chereches, Anca (ed.). 2012. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 22. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Coppock, Elizabeth and David Beaver. 2012. Weak uniqueness: The only difference between definites and indefinites. In Chereches (2012, 527–544).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coppock, Elizabeth and David Beaver. 2014. A superlative argument for a minimal theory of definiteness. In T. Snider, S. D’Antonio and M. Weigand (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 24. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. 177198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Croitor, Blanca. 2012. Acordul în limba româna [Agreement in Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.

  • Croitor, Blanca and Carmen Mîrzea-Vasile. 2014. Agreement of Romanian superlative adverbs and adjectives. Paper presented at The Interfaces of Adjective and Adverb in Romance and English conference, Graz, June 5–7, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2013. Strong indefinites are not quantificational: Proportional MANY vs. MOST. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 58. 401417.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen and Ion Giurgea. 2015. Le plus and (the) most. On the proportional reading of MANYsuperl across languages. Paper presented at the 37. Jahrestagung der DGfS, Leipzig, March 2015 conference and at the Incontro di Grammatica Generativa conference, Perugia, February 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emonds, Joe. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.

  • Farkas, Donka and Katalin É. Kiss. 2000. On the comparative and absolute readings of superlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 417455.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gawron, Jean Mark. 1995. Comparatives, superlatives, and resolution. Linguistics and Philosophy 18. 333380.

  • Giurgea, Ion. 2013. Originea articolului posesiv-genitival al si evolutia sistemului demonstrativelor în română [The origin of the possessive-genitival article al and the evolution of the system of demonstratives in Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Muzeului National al Literaturii Române.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grevisse, Maurice. 2008. Le bon usage. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

  • Hackl, Martin. 2009. On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: most versus more than half. Natural Language Semantics 17. 6398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms. University of Texas.

  • Heim, Irene. 1999. Notes on superlatives. Ms. MIT.

  • Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Krasikova, Sveta. 2012. Definiteness in superlatives. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Sassoon, K. Schulz and M. Westera (eds.) Logic, language and meaning. 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011. Revised selected papers. Berlin: Springer. 411420.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matushansky, Ora. 2008. On the attributive nature of superlatives. Syntax 11. 2690.

  • Pancheva, Roumyana and Barbara Tomaszewicz. 2012. Cross-linguistic differences in superlative movement out of nominal phrases. In N. Arnett and R. Bennett (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 292302.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75116.

  • Ross, John Robert. 1964. A partial grammar of English superlatives. MA thesis. University of Pennsylvania.

  • Sharvit, Yael and Penka Stateva. 2002. Superlative expressions, context, and focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 453505.

  • Shen, Zheng. 2014. On the relative readings with NP internal focus of superlatives. In R. E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.) Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Arizona State University. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 409418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. Comparative superlatives. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 245266.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna. 2012. Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most. In Chereches (2012, 1–25).

  • Teodorescu, Viorica 2009. Modification in the noun phrase. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Williams, Edwin. 1982. Another argument that passive is transformational. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 160163.

  • Živanović, Sašo. 2007. Kvantifikacijski vidiki logične oblike v minimlistični teoriji jezika [Quantificational aspects of LF]. Doctoral dissertation. Univerza v Ljubljani.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

  • Acta Linguistica Hungarica Impact Factor (2018): 0.231
  • Linguistics and Language SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q3
  • Literature and Literary Theory SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q2
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.13
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 9

Language: English

Founded in 1951
Publication: One volume of four issues annually
Publication Programme: 2020. Vol. 67.
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Arts and Humanities Citation Index
  • Bibliographie Linguistique/Linguistic Bibliography
  • International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR
  • Linguistics Abstracts
  • Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts
  • MLA International Bibliography
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • LinguisList


Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.


Editor(s)-in-Chief: Katalin É. Kiss,
Ferenc Kiefer

Editor: Éva Dékány

Technical Editor: Zoltán G. Kiss

Review Editor: Beáta Gyuris

Editorial Board

  • Anne Abeillé
  • Željko Bošković
  • Marcel den Dikken
  • Hans-Martin Gärtner
  • Elly van Gelderen
  • Anders Holmberg
  • Katarzyna Jaszczolt
  • István Kenesei
  • András Kertész
  • Anikó Lipták
  • Katalin Mády
  • Gereon Müller
  • Csaba Pléh
  • Giampaolo Salvi
  • Irina Sekerina
  • Péter Siptár
  • Gregory Stump
  • Peter Svenonius
  • Anne Tamm
  • Akira Watanabe
  • Jeroen van de Weijer

Acta Linguistica Academica
Address: Benczúr u. 33. HU–1068 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (+36 1) 351 0413; (+36 1) 321 4830 ext. 154
Fax: (36 1) 322 9297