Author:
F.Ş. Özbek Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Türkiye

Search for other papers by F.Ş. Özbek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-0201
Restricted access

Abstract

It is necessary to estimate the number of animals slaughtered outside slaughterhouses in countries like Türkiye, where slaughterings in non-slaughterhouses are relatively high. This paper presents the estimation of red meat production including all slaughterings both in slaughterhouses and in non-slaughterhouses by using a re-established model based on change in the inventory of animals including imported and exported animals, slaughtering rate for the slaughtered animals raised domestically in Türkiye, and total red meat consumption per capita per year in Türkiye. Total red meat production in Türkiye was estimated as 1 million 952 thousand 38 tonnes, bovine meat production was estimated as 1 million 471 thousand 550 tonnes, sheep and goats meat production was estimated as 480 thousand 488 tonnes in 2021. Total red meat human consumption per capita in Türkiye was estimated as 23 kg carcass weight per capita per year and 17 kg retail weight per capita per year. 17 kg of total red meat human consumption came from bovine meat, and 6 kg came from sheep and goats meat. According to the result of cluster analysis of European countries, Türkiye was clustered in the group of lowest total red meat consumption with Albania, Ukraine, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republic of Moldova, North Macedonia, Czech Republic, and Serbia.

  • AERI (2001). Analyses of the impact of support policies and programs on animal resources development in Turkey. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Project Report 2001–5, Publication Number: 53, 2001. 67 pages.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Binnie, M.A., Barlow, K., Johnson V., and Harrison, C. (2014). Red meats: time for a paradigm shift in dietary advice. Meat Science, 98(3): 445451.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bouvard, V., Loomis, D., Guyton, K.Z., Grosse, Y., Ghissassi, F.E., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Guha, N., Mattock, H., Straif, K., and the International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group (2015). Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncology, 16: 15991600.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chalak, A., Abou-Daher, C., Chaaban, J., and Abiad, M.G. (2016). The global economic and regulatory determinants of household food waste generation: a cross-country analysis. Waste Management, 48: 418422.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EC (2009). Working group on “Animal production statistics” of the Agricultural statistics committee. Doc. ASA/TE/F/655, European Commission, Luxembourg.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EU (2022). EU meat balance sheets, 2000–2019. Available at: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/document/download/61c30118-1667-4545-8b5e-b4014bad52c9_en?filename=agri-short-term-outlook-balance-sheets_en.xlsx (Accessed 14 December 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FAOSTAT (2022). Food balances. Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS (Accessed 30 May 2022).

  • Gaytancıoglu, S. (1999). Tekirdağ Merkez ilçede kanatlı eti tüketim düzeyinin incelenmesi (The poultry meat consumption evaluation in Tekirdağ central). Trakya University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Post Graduate Thesis, Tekirdağ. Available at: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=weFMBHaUra8rsS5wi2bmHGuciONbkSdP1org5IIt–rnAlwyUrS2rIVk05r0BfTB (Accessed 14 December 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Godfray, H.C.J., Aveyard, P., Garnett, T., Hall, J.W., Key, T.J., Lorimer, J., Pierrehumbert, R.T., Scarborough, P., Springmann, M., and Jebb, S.A. (2018). Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science, 361(6399): eaam5324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnston, B.C., Zeraatkar, D., Han, M.A., Vernooij, R.W.M., Valli, C., El Dib, R., Marshall, C., Stover, P.J., Fairweather-Taitt, S., Wójcik, G., Bhatia, F., de Souza, R., Brotons, C., Meerpohl, J.J., Patel, C.J., Djulbegovic, B., Alonso-Coello, P., Bala, M.M., and Guyatt, G.H. (2019). Unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: dietary guideline recommendations from the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(10): 756764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Karwowska M., Łaba S., and Szczepański, K. (2021). Food loss and waste in meat sector – why the consumption stage generates the most losses? Sustainability, 13(11): 6227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kara, M.K., Eyduran E., Özdemir T., and Zer, C. (2004). Van’da et ve ürünleri tüketim alışkanlıkları üzerine bir araştırma. (A study on consumption behaviours of meat and bee products in the province of Van). 4. National Zootechny Congress, 01-03 Eylül 2004, Isparta, pp. 661664.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kızıloğlu, S. and Kızıloğlu, R. (2013). Erzurum Merkez İlçede Et ve İthal Et Tüketme Durumunu İnceleyen Bir Araştırm. (A study of the status related to the meat and imported meat consumption in the Central District of Erzurum). Iğdır University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 3(1): 6168. In Turkish, with an English abstract.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leroy, F. and Cofnas, N. (2020). Should dietary guidelines recommend low red meat intake? Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60(16): 27632772.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mat, B., Arikan, M., Çevrimli, M., Akin, A., and Tekindal, M. (2021). Factors affecting the price of raw milk in Turkey using panel data analysis. Ciência Rural, 51. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20200937.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mutlu, S. (2007). Gıda güvenirliği açısından tüketici davranışları (Adana kentsel kesimde kırmızı et tüketimi örneği). (Consumer behaviors on food safety (A case study on red meat consumptıon in urban areas of Adana)). Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Post Graduate Thesis, Van. 205 pages. In Turkish, with an English summary.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OECD (2022). Meat consumption. Available at: https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm (Accessed 20 May 2022).

  • Özbek, F.Ş. (2010). Kişi başına düşen milli gelire ülkelerin gıda tüketim eğilimlerinin tespit edilmesi – Veri madenciliği uygulaması (The determination of food consumption patterns of the countries by national income per capita – data mining application.) TurkStat Journal of Statistical Research. 7(2): 6676. In Turkish, with English abstract.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SAS (2022a). SAS workshop - multivariate procedures. Available at: https://webpages.uidaho.edu/CALS-StatProg/sas/workshops/multivariate/cluster.pdf (Accessed 20 May 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SAS (2022b). The CLUSTER Procedure-average linkage Available at: https://documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/9.4_3.3/statug/statug_cluster_details01.htm#statug_cluster001089 (Accessed 20 May 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SPO (2001). Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı Hayvancılık Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu (Subcommission report for air transport prior to 6th five-years development plan), State Planning Organisation, 2547-ÖİK:587, Ankara. In Turkish.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B.L., Lassaletta, L., De Vries, W., Vermeulen, S.J., Herrero, M., Carlson, K.M., Jonell, M., Troell, M., Declerck, F., Gordon, L.J., ZuraykR., Scarborough, P., Rayner, M., Loken, B., Fanzo, J., Godfray, H.C.J., Tilman, D., RockströmJ., and Willett, W. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562(7728): 519525.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • STATBEL (2022). Supply balance sheets for meat. Available at: https://statbel.fgov.be/sites/default/files/files/documents/landbouw/8.8%20Bevoorradingsbalansen/delmeat_en.xls (Accessed 10 May 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thies, A.J., Efken, J., and Sönnichsen, M. (2022) How much meat do we eat? Estimating per capita meat consumption in Germany based on a market balance approach. The German Journal of Agricultural Economics. 71(2): 7691.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TurkStat (2022a). Methodological document of the revision for red meat production statistics. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Red-Meat-Production-Statistics-2020-2021-45671 (Accessed 31 May 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TurkStat (2022b). Gross domestic product per capita, 1998-2021, Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/DownloadIstatistikselTablo?p=Jv6Z89yLDbfiU8akxk1vnstvligOmfx3zL8Gvcnk/yujODYR10jrTdlo1HesMzEU (Accessed 14 December 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turkmenoglu, A. (2010). Hayvansal üretim tahmin modeli geliştirilmesi ve idari kayıtlarla karşılaştırılması. (Development of animal production estimation models and comparison with administrative records), Turkish Statistical Institute Expertness Thesis. TurkStat, Ankara.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uluat, S. (2002). Van ili Merkez ilçede hayvansal gıda tüketim yapısı. (Consumption pattern of animal products in Centre District of Van Province). Cukurova University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ph.D. Thesis, Adana. In Turkish.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yavuz, F. and Zulauf, C.R. (2004). Introducing a new approach to estimating red meat production in Turkey. The Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 28(4): 641648.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yavuz, F., Keskin, A., and Aksoy, A. (2006). A comparative analysis of Turkey’s red meat statistics and related research results. Proceedings of 15th Statistics Research Symposium, TurkStat, 11–12 May, Ankara.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: András Salgó

Co-ordinating Editor(s) Marianna Tóth-Markus

Co-editor(s): A. Halász

       Editorial Board

  • L. Abrankó (Szent István University, Gödöllő, Hungary)
  • D. Bánáti (University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary)
  • J. Baranyi (Institute of Food Research, Norwich, UK)
  • I. Bata-Vidács (Agro-Environmental Research Institute, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Budapest, Hungary)
  • F. Békés (FBFD PTY LTD, Sydney, NSW Australia)
  • Gy. Biró (National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science, Budapest, Hungary)
  • A. Blázovics (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • F. Capozzi (University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy)
  • M. Carcea (Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics Rome, Italy)
  • Zs. Cserhalmi (Food Science Research Institute, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Budapest, Hungary)
  • M. Dalla Rosa (University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy)
  • I. Dalmadi (Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • K. Demnerova (University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
  • M. Dobozi King (Texas A&M University, Texas, USA)
  • Muying Du (Southwest University in Chongqing, Chongqing, China)
  • S. N. El (Ege University, Izmir, Turkey)
  • S. B. Engelsen (University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark)
  • E. Gelencsér (Food Science Research Institute, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Budapest, Hungary)
  • V. M. Gómez-López (Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain)
  • J. Hardi (University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia)
  • H. He (Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China)
  • K. Héberger (Research Centre for Natural Sciences, ELKH, Budapest, Hungary)
  • N. Ilić (University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia)
  • D. Knorr (Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany)
  • H. Köksel (Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey)
  • K. Liburdi (Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy)
  • M. Lindhauer (Max Rubner Institute, Detmold, Germany)
  • M.-T. Liong (Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia)
  • M. Manley (Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa)
  • M. Mézes (Szent István University, Gödöllő, Hungary)
  • Á. Németh (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • P. Ng (Michigan State University,  Michigan, USA)
  • Q. D. Nguyen (Szent István University, Budapest, Hungary)
  • L. Nyström (ETH Zürich, Switzerland)
  • L. Perez (University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain)
  • V. Piironen (University of Helsinki, Finland)
  • A. Pino (University of Catania, Catania, Italy)
  • M. Rychtera (University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
  • K. Scherf (Technical University, Munich, Germany)
  • R. Schönlechner (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria)
  • A. Sharma (Department of Atomic Energy, Delhi, India)
  • A. Szarka (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • M. Szeitzné Szabó (National Food Chain Safety Office, Budapest, Hungary)
  • S. Tömösközi (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary)
  • L. Varga (University of West Hungary, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary)
  • R. Venskutonis (Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania)
  • B. Wróblewska (Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences Olsztyn, Poland)

 

Acta Alimentaria
E-mail: Acta.Alimentaria@uni-mate.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Biological Abstracts
  • BIOSIS Previews
  • CAB Abstracts
  • CABELLS Journalytics
  • Chemical Abstracts
  • Current Contents: Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
  • Elsevier Science Navigator
  • Essential Science Indicators
  • Global Health
  • Index Veterinarius
  • Science Citation Index
  • Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch)
  • SCOPUS
  • The ISI Alerting Services

2022  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
892
Journal Impact Factor 1.1
Rank by Impact Factor

Food Science and Technology (Q4)
Nutrition and Dietetics (Q4)

Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
1.1
5 Year
Impact Factor
1
Journal Citation Indicator 0.22
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator

Food Science and Technology (Q4)
Nutrition and Dietetics (Q4)

Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
32
Scimago
Journal Rank
0.231
Scimago Quartile Score

Food Science (Q3)

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1.7
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Food Science 225/359 (37th PCTL)
Scopus
SNIP
0.408

2021  
Web of Science  
Total Cites
WoS
856
Journal Impact Factor 1,000
Rank by Impact Factor Food Science & Technology 130/143
Nutrition & Dietetics 81/90
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,941
5 Year
Impact Factor
1,039
Journal Citation Indicator 0,19
Rank by Journal Citation Indicator Food Science & Technology 143/164
Nutrition & Dietetics 92/109
Scimago  
Scimago
H-index
30
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,235
Scimago Quartile Score

Food Science (Q3)

Scopus  
Scopus
Cite Score
1,4
Scopus
CIte Score Rank
Food Sciences 222/338 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,387

 

2020
 
Total Cites
768
WoS
Journal
Impact Factor
0,650
Rank by
Nutrition & Dietetics 79/89 (Q4)
Impact Factor
Food Science & Technology 130/144 (Q4)
Impact Factor
0,575
without
Journal Self Cites
5 Year
0,899
Impact Factor
Journal
0,17
Citation Indicator
 
Rank by Journal
Nutrition & Dietetics 88/103 (Q4)
Citation Indicator
Food Science & Technology 142/160 (Q4)
Citable
59
Items
Total
58
Articles
Total
1
Reviews
Scimago
28
H-index
Scimago
0,237
Journal Rank
Scimago
Food Science Q3
Quartile Score
 
Scopus
248/238=1,0
Scite Score
 
Scopus
Food Science 216/310 (Q3)
Scite Score Rank
 
Scopus
0,349
SNIP
 
Days from
100
submission
 
to acceptance
 
Days from
143
acceptance
 
to publication
 
Acceptance
16%
Rate
2019  
Total Cites
WoS
522
Impact Factor 0,458
Impact Factor
without
Journal Self Cites
0,433
5 Year
Impact Factor
0,503
Immediacy
Index
0,100
Citable
Items
60
Total
Articles
59
Total
Reviews
1
Cited
Half-Life
7,8
Citing
Half-Life
9,8
Eigenfactor
Score
0,00034
Article Influence
Score
0,077
% Articles
in
Citable Items
98,33
Normalized
Eigenfactor
0,04267
Average
IF
Percentile
7,429
Scimago
H-index
27
Scimago
Journal Rank
0,212
Scopus
Scite Score
220/247=0,9
Scopus
Scite Score Rank
Food Science 215/299 (Q3)
Scopus
SNIP
0,275
Acceptance
Rate
15%

 

Acta Alimentaria
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 1100 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription fee 2023 Online subsscription: 776 EUR / 944 USD
Print + online subscription: 896 EUR / 1090 USD
Subscription Information Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Acta Alimentaria
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1972
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia    
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0139-3006 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2535 (Online)

 

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Jun 2023 23 0 0
Jul 2023 11 0 1
Aug 2023 34 1 2
Sep 2023 15 0 0
Oct 2023 8 14 0
Nov 2023 8 24 0
Dec 2023 17 0 0