Author: John North 1
View More View Less
  • 1 University College London History Department Gower Street London WC1E 6BT England
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $532.00

There is no doubt at all that many Festus entries can be restored, in whole or in part, on the basis of the summary given by Paul together with the surviving letters from F . There is also no doubt that earlier restorations have quite often gone too far and that the distinction must be preserved between what we can restore with confidence and where there is at least an element of uncertainty. The cases examined here have been chosen precisely because they illustrate the dangers of over-confidence. Paul had a mind of his own and an audience to whom he was addressing himself, who had needs of their own. At times he simply reproduces what he saw in Festus, but he has specific criteria to which he is working and specific limitations on what he attempted. He was also evidently working under pressure of time. The implications for restoring the text of Festus are clear enough and only care in each individual decision can be recommended. There is a further issue here, which should not be forgotten: it is sometimes tempting to assume that whatever we read in Paul must ultimately derive from Festus, which is to say derive from Verrius; if that were so, Paul could therefore be treated uncritically as evidence for the first century CE. As we shell see, that assumption is not always a safe one.

The author instruction is available in PDF.

Please, download the file from HERE

  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 0.1
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 3
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q4 Arcehology
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q4 Classics
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q4 Cultura Studies
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q4 History
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q4 Language and Linguistics
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q4 Language and Linguistics
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q4 Linguistics and Language

 

  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.1
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 3
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4 Arcehology
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4 Classics
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4 Cultura Studies
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4 History
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4 Language and Linguistics
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4 Language and Linguistics
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q4 Linguistics and Language

Language: English, French, (Latin), German, Italian, Spanish

Founded in 1951
Size: B5
Publication: One volume of four issues annually
Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Arts & Humanities Citation Index
  • Current Contents - Arts and Humanities 

Subscribers can access the electronic version of every printed article.

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Takács, László

Managing Editor(s): Krähling, Edit

Editorial Board

      Dezső, T.
      Maróth, M.
      Mayer, Gy.
      Nagyillés, J.
      Simon, L. Z.
      Szekeres, Cs.
      Szovák, K.
      Visy, Zs.

 

Advisory Board

      Crawford, M.
      Easterling, P.
      Gastgeber, Chr.
      Horváth, L.
      Johnston, P.
      Láda, Cs.
      Maehler, H.
      Mastrocinque, A.
      Ritoók, Zs.

László Takács
Acta Antiqua
Egyetem utca 1.
H-2087 Piliscsaba
Phone: (+36 26) 375 375 / 2921
E-mail: acta.antiqua.hung@gmail.com