Livy's narrative, far from being a faithful and scrupulous account of historical facts, is first and foremost a piece of literary, a narration, a collection of exempla that should serve as models or anti-models for readers, as Livy himself says in his Praefatio (Liv. Praef. 10). In his writing work, he follows guiding principles, the most important of which is the dialectic of contrasts, inspired by oratory and rhetoric. On the basis of different examples from the first decade of Ab Urbe condita, the objective of this article is to examine how this principle of writing was applied to the theme of Returns (a motif well known in the imaginary and literature of classical Antiquity). Thus, it appears that each episode of return or attempt to return is systematically preceded by an episode of withdrawal from the civic community, with which it is contrasted in various ways. Examples of such withdrawal-return antagonist pairs are numerous, and they concern both individual characters (Tarquin the Proud, Coriolanus, Cincinnatus, Kaeso Quinctius, etc.) and collective ensembles (in the form of a secessio of an entire ordo).
Arena, V. (2012). Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York.
Brunt, P.A. (1988). Libertas in the Republic. In: Brunt P.A. (ed.), The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Clarendon Press, Oxford–New York, pp. 281–350.
Cogitore, I. (2011). Le Doux Nom de liberté: histoire d’une idée politique dans la Rome antique .De Boccard, Paris.
Cornell, T.J. (2003). Coriolanus. Myth, History and Performance. In: Braund, D. – Gill, C. (eds.), Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T.P. Wiseman .University of Exeter Press, Exeter, pp. 73–97.
Guarino, A. (1975). La rivoluzione della plebe .Liguori, Naples.
Jacotot, M. (2010). La représentation de Cincinnatus chez Tite-Live: figure morale et mythe républicain. In: Blandenet, M. – Chillet, C. – Courrier, C. (éds.), Figures de l’identité: naissance et destin des modèles communautaires dans le monde romain .ENS Éditions, Lyon, pp. 71–85.
Kapust, D.J. (2011). Exemplarity and Goodwill in Livy's From the Founding of Rome. In: Kapust, D.J. (ed.), Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus .Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York, pp. 81–110.
Martin, P.-M. (1982). L’idée de royauté à Rome . Vol. 1. Adosa, Clermont-Ferrand.
Martin, P.-M. (1994). L’Idée de royauté à Rome . Vol. 2. Adosa, Clermont-Ferrand.
Martin, P.-M. (2007). L’inspiration popularis dans les discours attribués aux tribuns de la plèbe par Tite-Live dans la première decade. In: Ledentu, M. (éd.), Parole, media, pouvoir dans l'Occident romain: hommages offerts au professeur Guy Achard. De Boccard, Lyon–Paris, pp. 187–210.
Mastrocinque, A. (1988). Lucio Giunio Bruto. Ricerche di storia, religione e diritto sulle origini della repubblica romana. La Reclame, Trento.
Mastrocinque, A. (2015). Tarquin the Superb and the Proclamation of the Roman Republic. In: Mineo, B. (ed.), A Companion to Livy. John Wiley, Malden (MA)–Oxford, pp. 301–313.
Meunier, N.L.J. (2024, forthcoming). Tite-Live et la mise en scène de l’Histoire. La construction narrative du conflit patricio-plébéien. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
Mineo, B. (2003). Camille, dux fatalis. In: Lachenaud, G. – Longrée, D. (éds.), Grecs et Romains aux prises avec l’Histoire. 2 vol. Presses universitaires, Rennes, pp. 159–175.
Mineo, B. (2006). Tite-Live et l’histoire de Rome. Études et commentaires 107. Klincksieck, Paris.
Ogilvie, R.M. (1956). A commentary on Livy. Books I–V. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Richardson, J.H. (2013). The Dioscuri and the Liberty of the Republic. Latomus, 72: 901–918.
Vasaly, A. (2015). Livy’s Political Philosophy: Power and Personality in Early Rome .Cambridge University Press, New York.
Wirszubski, C. (1950). Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate .Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.