View More View Less
  • 1 Geodetic and Geophysical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-9400 Sopron, POB 5, Hungary
  • | 2 Sanghai University, China Please ask the editor of the journal.
  • | 3 Geodetic and Geophysical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-9400 Sopron, POB 5, Hungary
Restricted access

In order to investigate imaging properties of various magnetotelluric interpretation parameters over complicated models, we carried out numerical model calculations, where the models contained a 3D near-surface (``shallow") part and a 3D or 2D deep part. Various alternatively defined magnetotelluric responses, all of them based on rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor were considered. Then we calculated correlation coefficients between all these MT responses, and the characteristic geometrical parameters of the subsurface models, considered as a composition of “shallow+deep” elements.A systematic behaviour, similar to that had been observed in 1D situation was found: det(ReZ), Re det(Z) based apparent resistivity has the largest depth of  investigation and the best lateral resolution. Furthermore, besides the phase, the Re det(Z) (a twin-parameter of the phase) seems to give the most direct response about deep structures. In presence of 3D near-surface inhomogeneities the most surprising result is that there are narrow period windows, where the deep model can be directly seen in the Re det(Z) and in the phase responses.

  • Basokur A T 1994: Geophysical Prospecting, 42, 141--149.

    () 42 Geophysical Prospecting : 141 -149.

  • Basokur A T 1999: J. of the Balkan Geoph. Soc., 2, 63--74.

    () 2 J. of the Balkan Geoph. Soc : 63 -74.

  • Cagniard L 1953: Geophysics, 18, 605--635.

    () 18 Geophysics : 605 -635.

  • Ledo J J, Queralt P, Martí A, Jones A G 2002: Geophys. J. Int., 150, 127--139.

    () 150 Geophys. J. Int : 127 -139.

  • Mackie R L, Madden T R 1997: Instructions for Running 3D MT Forward Modeling Program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Instructions for Running 3D MT Forward Modeling Program , ().

  • Schmucker U 1970: JGG, 22, 9--34.

    () 22 JGG : 9 -34.

  • Spies B R, Eggers D E 1986: Geophysics, 51, 1462--1471.

    () 51 Geophysics : 1462 -1471.

  • Szarka L 1994: Geophysical Prospecting, 42, 987--988.

    () 42 Geophysical Prospecting : 987 -988.

  • Szarka L, Fischer G 1989: Geophysical Transactions, 35, 157--172.

    () 35 Geophysical Transactions : 157 -172.

  • Szarka L, Menvielle M 1997: Geophys. J. Int., 129, 133--142.

    () 129 Geophys. J. Int : 133 -142.

  • Szarka L, Menvielle M 1999: Geophysical Prospecting, 47, 59--71.

    () 47 Geophysical Prospecting : 59 -71.

  • Szarka L, Menvielle M, Spichak V 2000: Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 35, 149--175.

    () 35 Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung : 149 -175.

  • Szarka L, Ádám A, Menvielle M 2004: Geophysical Prospecting, Manuscript 3166 (in press)

    () 3166 Geophysical Prospecting .