View More View Less
  • 1 Geodetic and Geophysical Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-9401 Sopron, POB 5, Hungary
  • | 2 Geodetic and Geophysical Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-9401 Sopron, POB 5, Hungary
  • | 3 Geodetic and Geophysical Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-9401 Sopron, POB 5, Hungary
Restricted access

In the contact zone of three tectonic units (Pannonian Basin, Eastern Alps and Dinarides), in a complicated - basin and range - geological situation magnetotelluric deep soundings were carried out along a 140 km long profile\linebreak (CELEBRATION-007) with a site distance of 2 km. In this area deep fractures of the Basin run together in NE-SW direction. In the paper various magnetotelluric images completed with gravity and magnetics are provided. In the traditional magnetotelluric approach, the structural indication of the TM and TE mode magnetotelluric sounding curves is clearly separated. The TM mode curves well express the resistive basement structure, already known from dense boreholes and detailed seismic exploration. The TE mode curves on the other hand (together with the induction vectors of very low values) definitely show the conductive root of the deep fractures, where the ductile materials are assumed to be raised into a very shallow depth of about of 8 km. The high heat flow of the area (about 100 mW/m\documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $^2$ \end{document}), which explains the shallowness of the conductive asthenosphere is also well indicated. The asthenosphere has more Alpine character in the NW part of the profile (its depth is about 80 km) and it is at smaller (about 50 km) depth in the SE part  of the profile, due to the higher heat flow near the extensional Drava Basin. The induction vectors are also separated into two characteristic regions, according to their general direction, influenced by both local and remote effects. A strong correlation is shown between magnetotelluric and gravity inversion results. A joint interpretation of magnetotelluric, gravity, magnetic results provide a quite comprehensive interpretation about the deep geological structures in SW-Hungary.

  • Ádám A 1987b: Gerlands Beitr. Geophysik, 96, 17--31.

    () 96 Gerlands Beitr. Geophysik : 17 -31.

  • Ádám A, Szarka L, Steiner T 1993: J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 45, 761--773.

    () 45 J. Geomag. Geoelectr. : 761 -773.

  • Wu N, Booker J R, Smith J T 1993: J. Geomagn. and Geoelectr., 45, 1073--1088.

    () 45 J. Geomagn. and Geoelectr. : 1073 -1088.

  • Ádám A 1978: Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 17, P21--P28.

    () 17 Phys. Earth Planet. Int. : P21 -P28.

  • Ádám A 1987a: Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 45, 209--215.

    () 45 Phys. Earth Planet. Int. : 209 -215.

  • Dövényi P, Horváth F, Liebe P, Gálfi J, Erki I 1983: Geophys. Transactions, 29, 3--114.

    () 29 Geophys. Transactions : 3 -114.

  • Guterch A, Grad M, Keller G R, CELEBRATION 2000 Organizing Committee, CELEBRATION 2000 Experiment Team 2001: EOS Transactions, 82.

    'CELEBRATION 2000 Organizing Committee, CELEBRATION 2000 Experiment Team ' () 82 EOS Transactions .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Haas J ed. 2001: Geology of Hungary. Eötvös University Press, Budapest

    Geology of Hungary , ().

  • Jones A G 1993: J. Geomagn. and Geoelectr., 45, 933--956.

    () 45 J. Geomagn. and Geoelectr. : 933 -956.

  • Ledo J 2002: 2-D versus 3-D magnetotelluric data interpretation. Electromagnetic Induction Workshop, Santa Fe, June 2002. Program and Abstract book

    2-D versus 3-D magnetotelluric data interpretation , ().

  • Kilényi É, Šefara J eds 1989: Geophys. Transactions, 36, 1--2 (Enclosure).

    () 36 Geophys. Transactions : 1 -2.

  • Kiss J 2005: Magyar Geofizika (in press)

  • Németh G 2005: Report on the geological experiments along the CEL-7 profile. Manuscript

  • Posgay K, Bodoky T, Hegedös E, Kovácsvölgyi S, Lenkey L, Szafián P, Takács E, Tímár Z, Varga G 1995: Tectonophysics, 252, 467--484.

    () 252 Tectonophysics : 467 -484.

  • Ritter O, Junge A, Dawes G J K 1998: Geophys. J. Int., 132, 535--548.

    () 132 Geophys. J. Int. : 535 -548.

  • Rokityansky I I 1982: Geoelectromagnetic investigation of the Earth's crust and Mantle. Springer Verglag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Geoelectromagnetic investigation of the Earth's crust and Mantle , ().

  • Szarka L, Ádám A, Novák A, Kiss J, Madarasi A, Prácser E, Varga Z 2005: In: Proceedings of the 17th IAGA WG 1.2 on “Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth” Workshop, Hyderabad, India, www.geophysics.dias.ie/mtnet/

  • Takács E, Pethö G, Szabó I 2005: Acta Geod. Geof. Hung., 40, 127--146.

    () 40 Acta Geod. Geof. Hung. : 127 -146.

  • Varga G 1979: Study of the geological basic profiles. Report on the telluric and magnetotelluric measurements in 1979 (in Hungarian). MÁELGI, Manuscript

  • Werner S 1953: Interpretation of magnetic anomalies at sheet-like bodies. Sveriges Geologiska Undersok, ser. C.C. Arsbok 43, N:06

  • Németh G 1997: Magyar Geofizika (in Hungarian), 38, 67--69.

    () 38 Magyar Geofizika : 67 -69.

  • Berdichevsky M N, Dmitriev V I 1976: Acta Geod. Geoph. Mont. Hung., 11, 447--484.

    () 11 Acta Geod. Geoph. Mont. Hung. : 447 -484.

  • Kis K, Agocs W B, Mayerhoff A A 1999: Geophys. Transactions, 42, 133--157.

    () 42 Geophys. Transactions : 133 -157.

  • Ádám A, Zalai P 2000: Magyar Geofizika (in Hungarian), 41, 60--74.

    () 41 Magyar Geofizika : 60 -74.

  • Ádám A, Szarka L, Prácser E, Varga G 1996: Geophys. Transactions, 40, 45--78.

    () 40 Geophys. Transactions : 45 -78.

  • Ádám A, Novák A, Szarka L, Wesztergom V 2003: Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 38, 305--326.

    () 38 Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung. : 305 -326.

  • Ádám A, Koppán A 2004: Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 39, 363--379.

    () 39 Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung. : 363 -379.

  • Ádám A, Wesztergom V 2001: Acta Geol. Hung., 44, 167--192.

    () 44 Acta Geol. Hung. : 167 -192.

  • Ádám A 2001: Earth Planets Space, 53, 903--918.

    () 53 Earth Planets Space : 903 -918.

  • Ádám A 2002: Annals of Geophysics, 55(5), 699--701.

    () 5 Annals of Geophysics : 699 -701.

AGG Editorial Office
Address: P.O. Box 5, H-9401 Sopron, Hungary
Phone: (36 99) 508 340
Fax: (36 99) 508 355
E-mail: actagg@ggki.hu

  • Impact Factor (2019): 0.909
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2019): 0.337
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2019): 18
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q3 Building and Construction
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q3 Geology
  • SJR Quartile Score (2019): Q3 Geophysics
  • Impact Factor (2018): 0.942
  • Scimago Journal Rank (2018): 0.314
  • SJR Hirsch-Index (2018): 17
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q3 Geology
  • SJR Quartile Score (2018): Q3 Geophysics

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica
Language English
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
2013
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Founder's
Address
H-1051 Budapest, Hungary, Széchenyi István tér 9.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó Springer
Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 2213-5812 (Print)
ISSN 2213-5820 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
May 2021 1 0 0
Jun 2021 0 0 0
Jul 2021 2 0 0
Aug 2021 1 0 0
Sep 2021 49 0 0
Oct 2021 0 0 0
Nov 2021 0 0 0