The Moho depth can be determined using seismic and/or gravimetric methods. These methods will not yield the same result as they are based on different hypotheses as well as different types, qualities and distributions of data. Here we present a new global model for the Moho computed based on a stochastic combination of seismic and gravimetric Moho models. This method employs condition equations in the spectral domain for the seismic and gravimetric models as well as degree-order variance component estimation to optimally weight the corresponding harmonics in the combination. The preliminary data for the modelling are the seismic model CRUST2.0 and a new gravimetric Moho model based on the inverse solution of the Vening Meinez-Moritz isostatic hypothesis and the global Earth Gravitational Model EGM08. Numerical results show that this method of stochastic combination agrees better with the seismic Moho model (3.6 km rms difference) than the gravimetric one. The model should be a candidate for dandifying the frequently sparsely data CRUST2.0. We expect that this way of combining seismic and gravimetric data would be even more fruitful in a regional study.
Airy G B 1855: Trans. Roy. Soc. (London), Ser.q B, Vol. 145, 1855.
Airy G. B., '' (1855) 145Trans. Roy. Soc. (London): 1855-.
Airy G. B.Trans. Roy. Soc. (London)18551451855)| false
Bagherbandi M, Sjöberg L E 2010: Comparison of crustal thickness from two isostatic models versus CRUST2.0. Studia Geoph. Geod. (submitted)
Bassin C, Laske G, Masters T G 2000: EOS Trans AGU, 81, F897.
Masters T. G., '' (2000) 81EOS Trans AGU: F897-.
Masters T. G.EOS Trans AGU200081F897)| false
Bjerhammar A 1983: In: Geodesy in transition. A volume dedicated to Helmut Moritz on the occasion of his 50th birthday, K P Schwarz, G Lachapelle eds, Division of Surveying Engineering, The University of Calgary, Canada, 25–42.
Bjerhammar A., '', in Geodesy in transition. A volume dedicated to Helmut Moritz on the occasion of his 50th birthday, (1983) -.
Bjerhammar A.Geodesy in transition. A volume dedicated to Helmut Moritz on the occasion of his 50th birthday1983)| false
Čadak O, Martinec Z 1991: Stud. Geoph. Geod., 35, 151–165.
Martinec Z., '' (1994) 117Geoph. J. Int.: 539-544.
Martinec Z.Geoph. J. Int.1994117539544)| false
Mooney W D, Laske G, Masters T G 1998: J. Geophys. Res., 103, 727–747.
Masters T. G., '' (1998) 103J. Geophys. Res.: 727-747.
Masters T. G.J. Geophys. Res.1998103727747)| false
Moritz H 1990: The figure of the Earth. H Wichmann, Karlsruhe
Moritz H., '', in The figure of the Earth, (1990) -.
Moritz H.The figure of the Earth1990)| false
Oldenburg D W 1974: Geophysics, 39, 526–536.
Oldenburg D. W., '' (1974) 39Geophysics: 526-536.
Oldenburg D. W.Geophysics197439526536)| false
Parker R L 1972: Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 31, 447–455.
Parker R. L., '' (1972) 31Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.: 447-455.
Parker R. L.Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.197231447455)| false
Pavlis N, Saleh J 2004: In: IAG International symposium on gravity geoid and space missions 2004, Porto, Portugal
Pavlis N, Holmes S, Kenyon S, Schmidt D, Trimmer R 2004: In: IAG International symposium on gravity, geoid and space missions 2004, Porto, Portugal
Pavlis N, Factor J, Holmes S 2006: Terrain-related gravimetric quantities computed for the next EGM, presented at the 1st International symposium of the International gravity service 2006, Istanbul, Turkey