Author:
View More View Less
• 1 Hungarian Academy of Sciences Kövesligethy Seismological Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Meredek u. 18 H-1112 Budapest Hungary
Restricted access

In the region of the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin (44–50N; 13–28E) 81 earthquakes have moment magnitude (Mw); 61 of them are crustal events (focal depth <65 km) while 20 earthquakes belong to the intermediate focal depth region of the Vrancea (Romania) zone. For crustal events the regression of moment magnitude (Mw) on local magnitude (Ml) shows a better fit for large magnitudes using a second order equation against to a linear relationship, and the actual quadratic formula based on 61 events is the following: \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $\begin{gathered} M_w = 1.37( \pm 0.28) + 0.39( \pm 0.18)M_l + 0.061( \pm 0.026)M_l^2 \hfill \\ (M_w :1.9 - 5.5;M_l :1.4 - 5.5). \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$ \end{document}.In the intermediate focal depth Vrancea zone of the south-eastern bend of the Carpathians (44.5–46.5N; 25.5–28.0E) the number of body wave magnitudes is the largest one (20) among the local (8), the surface wave (14) and the duration (17) magnitudes. The linear relationship between the moment (Mw) and the body wave (Mb) magnitudes has the following form: \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $M_w = 1.20( \pm 0.08)M_b - 0.76( \pm 0.40)(M_w :4.1 - 7.7;M_b :3.8 - 7.3).$ \end{document}.The relationships of the different (Ml, Ms, Mb, Md) magnitudes are also presented in the paper.

• Badawy A, Horváth F, Tóth L 2001: J. Geodyn., 31, 87–103.

Tóth L. , '' (2001 ) 31 J. Geodyn. : 87 -103.

• Grünthal G, Wahlström R 2003: J. Seismol., 7, 507–531.

Wahlström R. , '' (2003 ) 7 J. Seismol. : 507 -531.

• Oncescu M C, Bonjer K P 1997: Tectonophysics, 272, 291–302.

Bonjer K. P. , '' (1997 ) 272 Tectonophysics : 291 -302.

• Oros E 2003: Seismological Bulletin of Banat Region, Timisoara, Romania (manuscript)

• Süle B 2010: Central European J. Geosci., 2, 475–480.

Süle B. , '' (2010 ) 2 Central European J. Geosci. : 475 -480.

• Zsíros T 2000: Seismicity and seismic hazard of the Carpathian Basin: Hungarian earthquake catalogue (456-1995) (in Hungarian). MTA FKK GGKI, Budapest

Zsíros T. , '', in Seismicity and seismic hazard of the Carpathian Basin: Hungarian earthquake catalogue (456-1995) (in Hungarian) , (2000 ) -.

• Zsíros T 2003: Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 38, 345–362.

Zsíros T. , '' (2003 ) 38 Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung. : 345 -362.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 0
Full Text Views 3 1 0

## Post-Newtonian corrections in the dynamics in the Earth-Moon system and their impor-tance for the relativistic theories of gravitation

Authors: W. Schröder and H.-J. Treder

## Ionospheric scintillations modelling by MPS and MPC phase screens methods

Author: N. Caouren

## Assessment of TID activity from GPS phase data collected in a dense network of GPS receivers

Authors: M. Rieger and R. Leitinger

Author: P. Bakki

Author: J. Ádám

Author: J. Verő