Author:
Erik Angelone
eangelon@kent.edu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9854-2355
Erik Angelone
Department of Modern and Classical Language Studies, Institute for Applied Linguistics, Kent State University, USA
Search for other papers by Erik Angelone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erik Angelone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
To date, the assessment of student translations has been largely based on configurations of error categories that address some facet of the translation product. Focal points of such product-oriented error annotation include language mechanics (punctuation, grammar, lexis and syntax, for example) and various kinds of transfer errors. In recent years, screen recording technology has opened new doors for empirically informing translation assessment from a more process-oriented perspective (Massey and Ehrensberger-Dow, 2014; Angelone, 2019). Screen recording holds particular promise when tracing errors documented in the product back to potential underlying triggers in the form of processes that co-occur on screen in their presence. Assessor observations made during screen recording analysis can give shape to process-oriented error categories that parallel and complement product-oriented categories. This paper proposes a series of empirically informed, process-oriented error categories that can be used for assessing translations in contexts where screen recordings are applied as a diagnostic tool. The categories are based on lexical and semantic patterns derived from a corpus-based analysis of think-aloud protocols documenting articulations made by assessors when commenting on errors made in student translations while watching screen recordings of their work. It is hoped that these process-oriented error categories will contribute to a more robust means by which to assess and classify errors in translation.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Angelone, E. (2010). Uncertainty, uncertainty management, and metacognitive problem solving in the translation task. In G.M. Shreve , & E. Angelone (Eds.), Translation and cognition (pp. 17–40). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
-
Angelone, E. (2015). The impact of process protocol self-analysis on errors in the translation product. In M. Ehrensberger-Dow , B. Englund Dimitrova , S. Hubscher-Davidson , & U. Norberg (Eds.), Describing cognitive processes in translation (pp. 195–214). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
-
Angelone, E. (2019). Process-oriented assessment of problems and errors in translation: Expanding horizons through screen recording. In S. Vandepitte , E. Huertas Barros , & E. Iglesias Fernandez (Eds.), Quality assurance and assessment practices in translation and interpreting (pp. 179–199). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
-
Angelone, E. (2020). The impact of screen recording as a diagnostic process protocol on inter-rater consistency in translation assessment. The Journal of Specialized Translation, 34, 32–50.
-
Angelone, E. , & Shreve, G.M. (2011). Uncertainty management, metacognitive bundling in problem-solving, and translation quality. In S. O’Brien (Ed.), Cognitive explorations of translation (pp. 108–130). London/New York: Continuum.
-
Brunette, L. (2000). Towards a terminology for translation quality assessment: A comparison of TQA practices. The Translator, 6(2), 169–182.
-
Doherty, S. (2017). Issues in human and automatic translation quality assessment. In D. Kenney (Ed.), Human issues in translation technology. London: Routledge. 131–148.
-
Galán-Mañas, A. , & Hurtado Albir, A. (2015). Competence assessment procedures in translator training. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 9(1), 63–82.
-
Huertas Barros, E. , & Vine, J. (Eds.). (2019). New perspectives on assessment in translator education. London: Routledge.
-
Kornacki, M. (2019). The application of eye-tracking in translator training. In P. Pietrzak (Ed.), inTRAlinea. Special issue: New insights into translator training. Retrieved December 20, 2020 from http://www.intralinea.org/specials/article/2421.
-
Mariana, V. , Cox, T. , & Melby, A. (2015). The Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) framework: A new framework for translation quality assessment. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 23, 137–161.
-
Massey, G. , & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. (2011). Investigating information literacy: A growing priority in translation studies. Across Languages and Cultures, 12(2), 193–211.
-
Massey, G. , & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. (2014). Looking beyond the text: The usefulness of translation process data. In J. Jan Engberg , C. Heine , & D. Knorr (Eds.), Methods in writing process research (pp. 81–98). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
-
Mellinger, C. , & Shreve, G.M. (2016). Match evaluation and over-editing in a translation memory environment. In Martín, Ricardo Muñoz (Ed.), Re-embedding translation process research (pp. 131–148). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
-
Moorkens, J. , Castilho, S. , Doherty, S. , & Gaspari, F. (Eds.). (2018). Translation quality assessment: From principles to practice. Berlin: Springer.
-
Mossop, B. (2001). Revising and editing for translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.
-
Schäffer, M. , Nitzke, J. , Tardel, A. , Oster, K. , Gutermuth, S. , & Hansen-Schirra, S. (2019). Eye-tracking revision processes of translation students and professional translators. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 27(4), 589–603.
-
Shreve, G.M. , Angelone, E. , & Lacruz, I. (2014). Efficacy of screen recording in the other-revision of translations: Episodic memory and event models. MonTi: Monografías de traducción e interpretación, 1, 225–245.
-
TAUS (2016). TAUS quality dashboard. Retrieved November 18, 2020 from https://www.taus.net/data/dqf.
Prof. Kinga Klaudy
Eötvös Loránd University, Department of Translation and Interpreting
Múzeum krt. 4. Bldg. F, I/9-11, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (+36 1) 411 6500/5894
Fax: (+36 1) 485 5217
E-mail:
- WoS Arts & Humanities Citation Index
- Wos Social Sciences Citation Index
- WoS Essential Science Indicators
- Scopus
- Linguistics Abstracts
- Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts
- Translation Studies Abstractst
- CABELLS Journalytics
| 2022 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
283 |
| Journal Impact Factor | 0.7 |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
Linguistics (Q3) |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
0.6 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
1.4 |
| Journal Citation Indicator | 0.66 |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
Linguistics (Q3) |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
20 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0.796 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Linguistics and Language 67/1103 (Q1) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
1.6 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Language and Linguistics 208/1001 (79th PCTL) Linguistics and Language 243/1078 (77th PCTL) |
| Scopus SNIP |
0.868 |
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| Web of Science | |
| Total Cites WoS |
214 |
| Journal Impact Factor | 1,292 |
| Rank by Impact Factor | Linguistics 98/194 |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
1,208 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
1,210 |
| Journal Citation Indicator | 0,85 |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator | Language & Linguistics 108/370 Linguistics 122/274 |
| Scimago | |
| Scimago H-index |
19 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,994 |
| Scimago Quartile Score | Linguistics and Language 67/1103 (Q1) |
| Scopus | |
| Scopus Cite Score |
2,5 |
| Scopus CIte Score Rank |
Language and Linguistics 121/968 (Q1, D2) Linguistics and Language 128/1032 (Q1, D2) |
| Scopus SNIP |
1,576 |
| 2020 | |
|---|---|
| Total Cites WoS |
169 |
| Journal Impact Factor | 1,160 |
| Rank by Impact Factor |
Linguistics 99/193 (Q3) |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
1,040 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
1,095 |
| Journal Citation Indicator | 1,01 |
| Rank by Journal Citation Indicator |
Linguistics 107/259 (Q2) |
| Citable Items |
12 |
| Total Articles |
12 |
| Total Reviews |
0 |
| Scimago H-index |
14 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
1,257 |
| Scimago Quartile Score |
Language and Linguistics Q1 |
| Scopus Cite Score |
93/50=1,9 |
|
Scopus |
Language and Linguistics 130/879 (Q1) Linguistics and Language 147/935 (Q1) |
| Scopus SNIP |
1,670 |
| 2019 | |
|---|---|
| Total Cites WoS |
91 |
| Impact Factor | 0,360 |
| Impact Factor without Journal Self Cites |
0,320 |
| 5 Year Impact Factor |
0,500 |
| Immediacy Index |
0,083 |
| Citable Items |
12 |
| Total Articles |
12 |
| Total Reviews |
0 |
| Cited Half-Life |
n/a |
| Citing Half-Life |
12,7 |
| Eigenfactor Score |
0,00018 |
| Article Influence Score |
0,234 |
| % Articles in Citable Items |
100,00 |
| Normalized Eigenfactor |
0,02306 |
| Average IF Percentile |
20,053 (Q1) |
| Scimago H-index |
13 |
| Scimago Journal Rank |
0,648 |
| Scopus Scite Score |
94/51=1,8 |
| Scopus Scite Score Rank |
Language and Linguistics 120/830 (Q1) Linguistics and Language 135/884 (Q1) |
| Scopus SNIP |
1.357 |
| Across Languages and Cultures | |
|---|---|
| Publication Model | Hybrid |
| Submission Fee |
none |
| Article Processing Charge | 900 EUR/article |
| Printed Color Illustrations | 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece |
| Regional discounts on country of the funding agency | World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50% World Bank Low-income economies: 100% |
| Further Discounts | Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50% Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100% |
| Subscription fee 2023 | Online subsscription: 318 EUR / 384 USD Print + online subscription: 372 EUR / 452 USD |
| Subscription Information | Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content. |
| Purchase per Title | Individual articles are sold on the displayed price. |
| Across Languages and Cultures | |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Size | B5 |
| Year of Foundation |
1999 |
| Volumes per Year |
1 |
| Issues per Year |
2 |
| Founder | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Founder's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
| Publisher's Address |
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245. |
| Responsible Publisher |
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó |
| ISSN | 1585-1923 (Print) |
| ISSN | 1588-2519 (Online) |
Monthly Content Usage
| Abstract Views | Full Text Views | PDF Downloads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2023 | 29 | 2 | 3 |
| Jul 2023 | 27 | 2 | 4 |
| Aug 2023 | 41 | 3 | 5 |
| Sep 2023 | 33 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2023 | 44 | 3 | 0 |
| Nov 2023 | 50 | 6 | 2 |
| Dec 2023 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
Author:
Author:
Authors:
, , , , , , , , , and
Author:
Copyright Akadémiai Kiadó AKJournals is the trademark of Akadémiai Kiadó's journal publishing business branch.
Powered by PubFactory