Author:
Constance Blackwell International Society for Intellectual History 3 Sutton Place, London E9 6EH, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Constance Blackwell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Thomas Aquinas is usually studied as a metaphysician, this is not the reading given to him by three Renaissance philosophers. At the turn of the sixteenth century there were at least two schools of Thomists, one influenced by Avicenna and Scotus, and the other influenced by Averroes, a reading of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas himself. The discussion below traces how the interpretation of Thomas' De ente et essentia was changed from being a text for metaphysics to one used for physics. One of the meanings of ens-being-was as a term that was coterminous with the object. As a result, the debate over the first thing thought or the De primo cognito debate centered around the meaning for the term ens, the following essay demonstrates how it moved from metaphysics to physics.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Top

Verbum
Publication
Programme
ceased
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1585-079X (Print)
ISSN 1588-4309 (Online)

 

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Apr 2022 2 0 0
May 2022 7 0 0
Jun 2022 0 0 0
Jul 2022 3 0 0
Aug 2022 1 0 0
Sep 2022 3 0 0
Oct 2022 0 0 0