View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Sociology, Budapest University of Economic Sciences and Public Administration Department of Sociology Fővám tér 8. Budapest, Fővám tér 8. H-1093 1093 Budapest
  • | 2 Department of Sociology, Yale University Department of Sociology 140 Prospect Street 140 Prospect Street, New Haven Ct. 06520 Ct 06520 New Have
Restricted access

Who are Roma? What is the size of Roma population in a given country, a region of the world or in the whole word? To date, most social scientific research done in the Central European region on Roma populations operated with the assumption that one can arrive at an objective definition who Roma are and thus to come uup with accurate estimate of the size of Roma population. Rather than aiming at an „accurate” estimation of the Roma population, in this paper we hypothesize that ethnic groups are „social constructions”. The boundary of any single ethnicity is „fuzzy”: who is „inside” and who is „outside” this boundary will vary depending who does tha classification. This paper tests survey results on two systems of classification: 1) self-identification by the repondents, and 2) and classificaton by interviews in three countries, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania; and we show that there are substantial variation across countries. The paper offers strong support to the hypothesis that ethnic boundaries and various systems of classification are alterble across cultures. About two-third of those two were classified as Roma by the interviewers in Hungary and Romania do not regard themselves as Roma. In Bulagria two-third of the respodent who were classified as Roma by the interviewer identifier themselves as Roma. Therefore the task of social research is not to identify which classificatory system is „correct”, or „accure”, but to understand the social processes how these various classificatory system are created.

  • Ladányi, J. and Szelényi (1998): Ki a cigány? (Who is Roma?) Kritika, (3).

    'Ki a cigány? (Who is Roma?) ' () Kritika .

  • Emigh, R. J., Fodor, É. and Szelényi, I. (2001): The racialization and feminization of poverty? In Emigh, R. J. and Szelényi, I. (eds.): Poverty, Ethnicity and Gender in Eastern Europe During the Market Transition. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1-32.

    Poverty, Ethnicity and Gender in Eastern Europe During the Market Transition. , () 1 -32.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Eschbach, K. and Gomez, Ch. (1998): Choosing Hispanic identity: Ethnic identity switching among respondents to high school and beyond. Social Science Quarterly, 79 (1): 74-90.

    () 79 Social Science Quarterly : 74 -90.

  • Ferrante, J. and Brown, P., Jr., eds. (1998): The Social Construction of Race and Ethnicity in the United States. New York: Longman.

    The Social Construction of Race and Ethnicity in the United States. , ().

  • Havas, G., Kemény, I. and Kertesi, G. (1998): A relatív cigány a klasszifikációs küzdőtéren (The relative Roma in the field of classificatory struggles). Kritika, (3).

    () Kritika .

  • Kemény, I. (1976): Beszámoló a magyarországi cigányok helyzetével foglalkozó, 1971-ben végzett kutatásról. (A report on the conditions of Roma in Hungary in 1971). Budapest: MTA Szociológiai Kutató Intézet.

    Beszámoló a magyarországi cigányok helyzetével foglalkozó, 1971-ben végzett kutatásról. (A report on the conditions of Roma in Hungary in 1971) , ().

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kemény, I. (1997): A magyarországi roma (cigány) népességről (két felmérés tükrében). (On the Roma [Gypsy] population in Hungary.) Magyar Tudomány, (6).

  • Waters, M. (1999): The social construction of race and ethnicity - Some examples from demography. In Denton, N. and Tolnay, S. (eds.): American Diversity: A Demographic Challenge for the Twenty-First Century. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    American Diversity: A Demographic Challenge for the Twenty-First Century. , ().

  • Kertesi, G. (1998): Az empirikus cigánykutatások lehetőségéről. (Is the empirical study of Gypsies possible?). Replika, March.

  • Barth, F. (1969): Introduction. In F. Barth (ed.): Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. , ().

  • Csepeli, Gy. (2001): Social Psychological Roots of Discrimination against the Roma minority in Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Law and Society Association and Research Committee on Sociology of Law held in Budapest, July 4-7, 2001.

  • Davidova (1995): Romano drom - Cesty romu: 1945-1990. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackevo v Olomouci.

    Romano drom - Cesty romu: 1945-1990. , ().

  • Emigh, R. J. and Szelényi, I., eds. (2001): Poverty, Ethnicity and Gender in Eastern Europe During the Market Transition. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Poverty, Ethnicity and Gender in Eastern Europe During the Market Transition. , ().

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Wade, P. (1997): Race and Ethnicity in Latin America. Chicago: Pluto Press.

    Race and Ethnicity in Latin America. , ().

  • Waters, M. (1992): Ethnic Options. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Ethnic Options. , ().

  • Telles, E. Forthcoming: Racial Ambiguity among the Brazilian population. Ethnic and Racial Studies.

    'Forthcoming: Racial Ambiguity among the Brazilian population ' () Ethnic and Racial Studies. .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Ladányi, J. (1996): Romák Közép-Kelet-Európában (Roma in Central Eastern Europe). Társadalmi Szemle, 51 (4).

    'Romák Közép-Kelet-Európában (Roma in Central Eastern Europe). ' () 51 Társadalmi Szemle .

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Telles, E. and Lim, N. (1998): Does it matter who answers the race question? Racial classification and income inequality in Brazil. Demography, 35 (4), November: 465-74.

    'Does it matter who answers the race question? Racial classification and income inequality in Brazil. ' () 35 Demography : 465 -74.

    • Search Google Scholar
  • Kertesi, G. and Kézdi, G. (1998): A cigány népesség Magyarországon. (The Roma population in Hungary.) Budapes: Socio-Typo.

    A cigány népesség Magyarországon. (The Roma population in Hungary.) , ().

Review of Sociology
Language English
Year of
Foundation
2000
Publication
Programme
ceased
Founder A Magyar Szociológiai Társaság -- Hungarian Sociological Association
Founder's
Address
H-1097 Budapest, Hungary Tóth Kálmán u.4.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 1417-8648 (Print)
ISSN 1588-2845 (Online)