The objective of this study was to establish and optimize high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) analysis of gatifloxacin and related substances by the method of design of experiment (DOE). First, preliminary screening of 22 solvents was performed using uniform design (UD) to establish the developing solvent proposed to be optimized. The optimal proportions of components in the developing solvent were established by using central composite design (CCD) to establish and validate HPTLC analysis of gatifloxacin and related substances. Using DOE, it was found that the optimal proportions (by volume) of components in the developing solvent in the HPTLC analytical method were methanol-1,2-dichloroethane-concentrated ammonia solution-acetonitrile (2.8:7.2:0.5:0.5, v/v). Methodological validation showed that the established HPTLC method could separate gatifloxacin and 8 related substances with similar structures effectively. In particular, impurity pairs with the greatest separation difficulty (due to their similar polarities and dipole moments), e.g., impurity #3 (8-fluorogatifloxacin) and impurity #8 (gatifloxacin 2-methylpiperazine), impurity #3, and substance #9 (gatifloxacin), could also be separated effectively. The HPTLC method was simple, accurate, reliable, and suitable for rapid qualitative analysis of gatifloxacin and related substances in routine tests. Additionally, the analytical results presented here may provide useful supplemental information on the current reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method, especially in terms of the mechanism of normal-phase separation.
Z.W. Bo, X.M. Zhe, L.Y. Ping, H.C. Qin, Drug Stands China 4 (2008) 293–294.
Qin H.C. , '' (2008 ) 4 Drug Stands China : 293 -294 .
Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission, Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China 2010, Vol. 2. China Medical Science Press, Beijing, 2010.
'', in Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China 2010, Vol. 2 , (2010 ) -.
J. Sherma, Anal. Chem. 80 (2008) 4253–4267.
Sherma J. , '' (2008 ) 80 Anal. Chem. : 4253 -4267 .
M.B. Patel, K.M. Patel, G.S. Patel, B.N. Suhagia, A.M. Prajapati, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 30 (2007) 2459–2471.
Prajapati A.M. , '' (2007 ) 30 J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. : 2459 -2471 .
A.S. Rathore, L. Sathiyanarayanan, K.R. Mahadik, Am. J. Anal. Chem. 1 (2010) 144–149.
Mahadik K.R. , '' (2010 ) 1 Am. J. Anal. Chem. : 144 -149 .
S.C. Cheng, M.Z. Huang, J. Shiea, Anal. Chem. 81 (2009) 9274–9281.
Shiea J. , '' (2009 ) 81 Anal. Chem. : 9274 -9281 .
M. Lancaster, D.M. Goodall, E.T. Bergstrom, S.M. Crossen, P. Myers, Anal. Chem. 78 (2006) 905–911.
Myers P. , '' (2006 ) 78 Anal. Chem. : 905 -911 .
S. Nagpel, Karan, A. Upadhyay, T.R. Bhardwaj, A. Thakkar, Current Pharm. Anal. 7 (2011) 62–70.
Thakkar A. , '' (2011 ) 7 Current Pharm. Anal. : 62 -70 .
H.C. Qin, Sci. China Ser B. 40 (2010) 679–687.
Qin H.C. , '' (2010 ) 40 Sci. China Ser B. : 679 -687 .
S.L.C. Ferreiraa, R.E. Bruns, E.G.P.D. Silva, W.N.L.D. Santos, C.M. Quintella, J.M. David, J.B.D. Andrade, M.C. Breitkreitz, I.C.S.F. Jardim, B.B. Neto, J. Chromatogr. A 1158 (2007) 2–14.
Neto B.B. , '' (2007 ) 1158 J. Chromatogr. A : 2 -14 .
P. Barmpalexis, F.I. Kanaze, E. Georgarakis, J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 49 (2009) 1192–1202.
Georgarakis E. , '' (2009 ) 49 J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. : 1192 -1202 .
M.M. Sebaiy, A.A. El-Shanawany, S.M. El-Adl, L.M.A. Aziz, H.A. Hashem, Asian J. Pharm Res. 4 (2011) 119–125.
Hashem H.A. , '' (2011 ) 4 Asian J. Pharm Res. : 119 -125 .
M.L. Devi, K.B. Chandrasekhar, Chromatographia 69 (2009) 985–992.
Chandrasekhar K.B. , '' (2009 ) 69 Chromatographia : 985 -992 .
S.K. Motwani, R. Khar, F.J. Ahmad, S. Chopra, K. Kohli, S. Talegaonkar, Z. Lgbal, Anal. Chim. Acta 576 (2006) 253–260.
Lgbal Z. , '' (2006 ) 576 Anal. Chim. Acta : 253 -260 .
M.C. Sharma, S. Sharma, Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. 3 (2011) 1179–1185.
Sharma S. , '' (2011 ) 3 Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. : 1179 -1185 .
D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005.
Montgomery D.C. , '', in Design and Analysis of Experiments , (2005 ) -.
F.K. Tai, M.C. Xing, Orthogonal and Uniform Experiment Design. Science Press, Beijing, 2001.
Z.J. Bao, B.J. Dong, S.Y. Ying, Chin. J. Chromatogr. 7 (1989) 256–261
Ying S.Y. , '' (1989 ) 7 Chin. J. Chromatogr. : 256 -261 .
R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, C.M. Anderson-Cook, Response Surface Methodology, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2008.
Anderson-Cook C.M. , '', in Response Surface Methodology , (2008 ) -.
T. Sivakumar, R. Manavalan, C. Muralidharan, K. Valliappan, J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 43 (2007) 1842–1848.
Valliappan K. , '' (2007 ) 43 J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. : 1842 -1848 .
K. Ferenczi-Fodor, B. Renger, Z. Végh, J. Planar Chromatogr. 3 (2010) 173–179.
Végh Z. , '' (2010 ) 3 J. Planar Chromatogr. : 173 -179 .
B. Renger, Z. Végh, K. Ferenczi-Fodor, J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011) 2712–2721.
Ferenczi-Fodor K. , '' (2011 ) 1218 J. Chromatogr. A : 2712 -2721 .
L. Wei, H.C. Qin, J. Chromatogr. A 1190 (2008) 141–149.
Qin H.C. , '' (2008 ) 1190 J. Chromatogr. A : 141 -149 .
N.J. Smith, M.A. Domin, L.T. Scott, Org. Lett. 16 (2008) 3493–3496.
Scott L.T. , '' (2008 ) 16 Org. Lett. : 3493 -3496 .