Authors:
Veena Patel Anand Pharmacy College, Opp. Town Hall, Anand, Gujarat, India

Search for other papers by Veena Patel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kinjal Solanki Anand Pharmacy College, Opp. Town Hall, Anand, Gujarat, India

Search for other papers by Kinjal Solanki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kalpana Patel Anand Pharmacy College, Opp. Town Hall, Anand, Gujarat, India

Search for other papers by Kalpana Patel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Tejal Gandhi Anand Pharmacy College, Opp. Town Hall, Anand, Gujarat, India

Search for other papers by Tejal Gandhi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Summary

A simple, specific, and quantitative high-performance thin-layer chromatographic (HPTLC) method has been developed for the quantitative determination of lupeol in 2 marketed formulations, namely, Manasamitra vatakam and Amree plus capsule. Chromatographic development was performed by using a pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 aluminum-backed plate, and the development was carried out using toluene-ethyl acetate (9.48:0.52, V/V) as the optimized mobile phase. The developed TLC plates were derivatized by using anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid reagent. The detection of lupeol was carried out at 600 nm. Box-Behnken design was applied for optimization of the chromatographic conditions, and combinations of factors, such as mobile phase composition (volume of ethyl acetate) (A), chamber saturation time (B), and migration distance (C) likely to affect RF were identified from preliminary trials and further optimized using a response surface design. Among 3 factors, the significant factor found was the volume of ethyl acetate that resulted in higher change in the RF value and can be considered as a critical method parameter. Full factorial design was applied for optimization of extraction efficiency. The factors selected for the optimization process were volume of methanol (A) and duration of extraction (B) with percentage yield of extract as response. The linear ranges were found to be 500–3000 ng per band. The accuracy and precision measured were less than 2% relative standard deviation for lupeol. The sensitivity of the method in terms of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was measured. The proposed method was found to be accurate, precise, reproducible, robust, and specific and can be applicable for the determination of lupeol in the quality-control testing of extract and polyherbal formulations.

  • [1]

    S. Parasuraman , G.S. Thing, S.A. Dhanaraj, Pharmacogn. Rev. 8 (2014) 7380.

  • [2]

    Y. Ding , H.T. Nguyen, S.I. Kim, H. W. Kim, Y.H. Kim, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 36073610.

  • [3]

    B.K.M. Ahamed , V. Krishna, H.B. Gowdru, H. Rajanaika, H.M. Kumaraswamy, S. Rajshekarappa, Res. J. Med. Plant. 1 (2007) 7282.

  • [4]

    T.M.A. Alves , T.J. Nagem, L.H. Carvalho, A.U. Krettli, C.L. Zani, Planta Med. 63 (1996) 554555.

  • [5]

    D.H. Miles , U. Kokpol, L.H. Zalkow, S.J. Steindel, J.B. Nabors, J. Pharm. Sci. 63 (1974) 613615.

  • [6]

    E.R. Trumball , E. Bianchi, D.J. Eckert, R.M. Wiedhopf, J.R. Cole, J. Pharm. Sci. 65 (1976) 14071408.

  • [7]

    H. Ali , P.J. Houghton, A. Soumyanath, J. Ethnopharmacol. 107 (2006) 449455.

  • [8]

    A.J. Al-Rehaily , K.E.H. El-Tahir, J.S. Mossa, S. Rafatullah, Nat. Prod. Sci. 7 (2001) 7682.

  • [9]

    R. Saleem , S.I. Ahmad, M. Ahmed, Z. Faizi, S. Zikr-ur-Rehman, M. Ali, Biol. Pharm. Bull. 26 (2003) 4146.

  • [10]

    M.M. Malini , R. Baskar, P. Varalakshmi, Jpn. J. Med. Sci. Biol. 48 (1995) 211220.

  • [11]

    T. Geetha , P. Varalakshmi, R.M. Latha, Pharm. Res. 37 (1998) 191195.

  • [12]

    T. Geetha , P. Varalakshmi, Mol. Cell. Biochem. 201 (1999) 8387.

  • [13]

    T. Geetha , P. Varalakshmi, Gen. Pharm. 32 (1999) 495497.

  • [14]

    T. Geetha , P. Varalakshmi, J. Ethnopharmacol. 76 (2001) 7780.

  • [15]

    A.G. Azebaze , F. Menasria, L.G. Noumi, E.L. Nguemfo, M.F. Tchamfo, A.E. Nkengfack, Planta Med. 75 (2009) 243248.

  • [16]

    S. Bani , A. Kaul, B. Khan, S.F. Ahmad, K.A. Suri, B.D. Gupta, Phytother. Res. 20 (2006) 279287.

  • [17]

    E.J. Blain , A.Y. Ali, V.C. Duance, Phytother. Res. 24 (2009) 905912.

  • [18]

    B. Renger , Z. Végh, K. Ferenczi-Fodor, J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011) 27122721.

  • [19]

    ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical Procedure: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1), International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • [20]

    K. Gohel , K. Patel, P. Shah, L. Hingorani, T. Gandhi, J. Planar Chromatogr. 31 (2018) 318326.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

To see the editorial board, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Manuscript Submission: HERE

For subscription options, please visit the website of Springer Nature.

Journal of Planar Chromatography - Modern TLC
Language English
Size A4
Year of
Foundation
1988
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
6
Founder Akadémiai Kiadó
Founder's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
CH-6330 Cham, Switzerland Gewerbestrasse 11.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0933-4173 (Print)
ISSN 1789-0993 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Apr 2024 10 0 0
May 2024 7 0 0
Jun 2024 9 0 0
Jul 2024 7 0 0
Aug 2024 19 0 0
Sep 2024 24 0 0
Oct 2024 24 0 0