Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) can have high inadequate results. The main objective of this study was to validate the sensitivity of imprint cytology and compare it to that of FNAC across all levels of staff experience. Our other objective was to find out whether handling of a core biopsy to obtain an imprint slide affected its morphology so as to make histopathological reporting from that tissue difficult. This we thought could be of significance while trying to diagnose smaller cancers where just one core could contain tumour. Methods: Patients (n = 56) with a suspicious breast lump had fine needle aspiration (FNA) and core biopsy. The core biopsy used to prepare the two imprint cytology slides was sent separately for histopathology reporting. Results: Simultaneous imprint cytology from a core biopsy increased the sensitivity of cytology results by 12% compared to that of FNAC alone. In this series we found imprint cytology to have a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 82.7%. The histopathologists did not report any distortion in tissue morphology so as to affect histological reporting of the core used. Conclusion: Since most patients will have a core biopsy to confirm invasive cancer and the technique of imprint cytology is easily performed, perhaps it should be more widely used especially in units where the sensitivity of FNA is low.
1. JM Dixon TJ Anderson J Lamb SJ Nixon AP Forrest 1984 Fine needle aspiration cytology, in relationship to clinical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of solid breast mass Br J Surg 71 8 593 6.
2. A Vetrani F Fulciniti G Di Benedetto P Zeppa G Troncone A Boscaino G de Rosa L Palombini 1992 Fine-needle aspiration biopsies of breast masses. An additional experience with 1153 cases (1985 to 1988) and a meta-analysis Cancer 69 3 736 40.
3. IA Park EK Ham 1997 Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions. Histologic subtype in false negative cases Acta Cytol 41 4 1131 8.
4. M Dray F Mayall A Darlington 2000 Improved fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology results with a near-patient diagnosis service for breast lesions Cytopathology 11 1 32 7.
5. BM Ljung A Drejet N Chiampi J Jeffrey WH Goodson 3rd K Chew DH Moore 2nd TR Miller 2001 Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy is determined by physician training in sampling technique Cancer 93 4 263 8.
6. JM Pleat CJS Dunkin N Tam ID Buley P Griffiths DJ Coleman 2003 Fine needle aspiration in plastic surgery outpatients: a retrospective study Cytopathology 14 6 332 8.
7. US Albert V Duda P Hadji K Goerke F Hild K Bock A Ramaswamy KD Schulz 2000 Imprint cytology of core needle biopsy specimens of breast lesions. A rapid approach to detecting malignancies, with comparison of cytologic and histopathologic analyses of 173 cases Acta Cytol 44 1 57 62.
8. G Dennison R Anand SH Makar JA Pain 2003 A prospective study of the use of fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer Breast J 9 6 491 3.
9. FA Frost GF Sterrett D Whitaker WB De Boer A Segal 2001 Core imprint cytology: a useful method for same-day reporting. Abstract Pathology International 51 12 A2.
10. AR Carmichael A Berresford A Sami R Boparai 2004 Imprint cytology of needle core biopsy specimens of breast lesion: is it best of both worlds? Breast 13 3 232 4.
11. MO Prempeh M Khan G Bradley RJ Reyes TK Walters 2003 The accuracy of imprint cytology of core biopsies from breast lesions Br J Surg 90 Supplement 1 44.
12. S Veniti L Iannidou-Mouzaka H Toufexi J Xenitides P Anastasiadis 1996 Imprint cytology: a rapid, reliable method of diagnosing breast malignancy Acta Cytol 40 4 649 52.