View More View Less
  • 1 Sebészeti Klinika, Pécsi Orvostudományi Egyetem, Pécs
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $356.00
  • 1. UN Maduekwe SS Yoon 2011 An evidence-based review of the surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma J Gastrointest Surg 15 5 730 41.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. H Hur SG Kim JH Shim KY Song et al. 2011 Effect of early oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery: a result of randomized clinical trial Surgery 149 4 561 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. D Marrelli C Pedrazzani P Morgagni G de Manzoni et al. 2011 Changing clinical and pathological features of gastric cancer over time Br J Surg 98 9 1273 83.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. H Saito K Kihara H Kuroda T Matsunaga et al. 2011 Surgical outcomes for gastric cancer patients with intraperitoneal free cancer cell, but no macroscopic peritoneal metastasis J Surg Oncol 104 5 534 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. T Nozoe T Iguchi E Adachi A Matsukuma et al. 2011 Preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an independent prognostic indicator for gastric cancer Surg Today 41 4 510 3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Mahar AL , Coburn NG, Singh S, Law C et al.: A systematic review of surgery for non-curative gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2011 Oct 28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. CT Cheng CY Tsai JT Hsu R Vinayak et al. 2011 Aggressive surgical approach for patients with T4 gastric carcinoma: promise or myth Ann Surg Oncol 18 6 1606 14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. JZ Zhang HS Lu CM Huang XY Wu et al. 2011 Outcome of palliative total gastrectomy for stage IV proximal gastric cancer Am J Surg 202 1 91 6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. M Ikeguchi H Saito S Tatebe T Wakatsuki et al. 2011 Outcome of treatment of liver metastasis after curative surgery for gastric cancer Am Surg 77 9 1274 6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. MA Memon MS Subramanya S Khan MB Hossain et al. 2011 Meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma Ann Surg 253 5 900 11.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. CM Huang JX Lin CH Zheng P Li et al. 2011 Effect of negative lymph node count on survival for gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy Eur J Surg Oncol 37 6 481 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. H Yamashita H Katai S Morita M Saka et al. 2011 Optimal extent of lymph node dissection for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction carcinoma Ann Surg 254 2 274 80.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. T Kosuga D Ichikawa K Okamoto S Komatsu et al. 2011 Survival benefits from splenic hilar lymph node dissection by splenectomy in gastric cancer patients: relative comparison of the benefits in subgroups of patients Gastric Cancer 14 2 172 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. T Takayama K Wakatsuki S Matsumoto K Enomoto et al. 2011 Prognostic significance of splenic hilar nodal involvement in proximal third gastric carcinoma Hepatogastroenterology. 58 106 647 51.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. RC Fields VE Strong M Gönen KA Goodman et al. 2011 Recurrence and survival after pathologic complete response to preoperative therapy followed by surgery for gastric or gastrooesophageal adenocarcinoma Br J Cancer 104 12 1840 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. M Ychou V Boige JP Pignon T Conroy et al. 2011 Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial J Clin Oncol 29 13 1715 21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. V Dudeja EB Habermann A Abraham W Zhong et al. 2012 Is there a Role for Surgery with Adequate Nodal Evaluation Alone in Gastric Adenocarcinoma J Gastrointest Surg 16 2 238 46.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. S Chae A Lee JH Lee 2011 The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification Gastric Cancer 14 2 166 71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. DJ Lips HW Schutte RL van der Linden AE Dassen et al. 2011 Sentinel lymph node biopsy to direct treatment in gastric cancer. A systematic review of the literature Eur J Surg Oncol 37 8 655 61.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. J Cai D Wei CF Gao CS Zhang et al. 2011 A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Open versus Laparoscopy-Assisted D2 Radical Gastrectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer Dig Surg 28 5–6 331 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. GC Karakousis S Singer J Zheng M Gonen et al. 2011 Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison Ann Surg Oncol 18 6 1599 605.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Submit Your Manuscript

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Oláh, Attila

Editorial Board

  • DR. BÁLINT ANDRÁS
  • DR. BEZSILLA JÁNOS
  • DR. BOROS MIHÁLY
  • DR. BURSICS ATTILA
  • DR. DAMJANOVICH LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. ENTZ LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. GULYÁS GUSZTÁV
  • DR. HARSÁNYI LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. HORVÁTH ÖRS PÉTER
  • DR. ISTVÁN GÁBOR
  • DR. KECSKÉS LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. KÓBORI LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. KUPCSULIK PÉTER
  • DR. LÁZÁR GYÖRGY
  • DR. LESTÁR BÉLA
  • DR. MÁTRAI ZOLTÁN
  • DR. MOHOS ELEMÉR
  • DR. MOLNÁR F. TAMÁS
  • DR. ONDREJKA PÁL
  • DR. PAPP ANDRÁS
  • DR. RÉNYI-VÁMOS FERENC
  • DR. ROMICS LÁSZLÓ JR.
  • DR. SÓTONYI PÉTER
  • DR. SZIJÁRTÓ ATTILA
  • DR. SZŰCS ÁKOS
  • DR. VEREBÉLY TIBOR
  • DR. VERECZKEI ANDRÁS

Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital, Surgery
Vasvári Pál út 2. H-9024 Győr, Hungary
Phone: +36 96 503 320 --- Fax: +36 96 507 936
E-mail: olaha@petz.gyor.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Index Medicus
  • PubMed Central

 

2020  
CrossRef Documents 37
WoS Cites 45
Wos H-index 8
Days from submission to acceptance 60
Days from acceptance to publication 63

 

2019  
WoS
Cites
63
CrossRef
Documents
31

 

Magyar Sebészet
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Online subsscription: 276 EUR / 372 USD
Print + online subscription: 320 EUR / 440 USD
Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Magyar Sebészet
Language Hungarian
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1947
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 74
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Sebész Társaság -- Hungarian Surgical Society
Founder's
Address
H-1082 Budapest, Hungary Üllői út 78.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0025-0295 (Print)
ISSN 1789-4301 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Feb 2021 7 0 0
Mar 2021 5 0 2
Apr 2021 6 0 0
May 2021 9 0 0
Jun 2021 3 0 0
Jul 2021 3 0 0
Aug 2021 0 0 0