View More View Less
  • 1 Sebészeti Klinika, Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Szeged
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $25.00

1 year subscription (Individual Only)

USD  $356.00
  • 1. JS Gold M Gönen A Gutiérrez JM Broto X García-del-Muro TC Smyrk RG Maki S Singer MF Brennan CR Antonescu JH Donohue RP DeMatteo 2009 Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for recurrence-free survival after complete surgical resection of localised primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective analysis Lancet Oncol 10 11 1045 52.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. G Speranza JH Doroshow S Kummar 2010 Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel: changes in the landscape Curr Opin Oncol 22 387 93.

  • 3. TR Halfdanarson RR McWilliams JH Donohue JF Quevedo 2010 A single-institution experience with 491 cases of small bowel adenocarcinoma Am J Surg 199 797 803.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. MJ Overman CY Hu RA Wolff GJ Chang 2010 Dec 1 Prognostic value of lymph node evaluation in small bowel adenocarcinoma: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database Cancer 116 23 5374 82.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Overman MJ , Hu CY, Kopetz S, Abbruzzese JL, Wolff RA, Chang GJ: A Population-Based Comparison of Adenocarcinoma of the Large and Small Intestine: Insights into a Rare Disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2011 Dec 21; Epub ahead of print.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. P Thirunavukarasu M Sathaiah S Sukumar CJ Bartels H Zeh 3rd KK Lee DL Bartlett 2011 Meckel's diverticulum – a high-risk region for malignancy in the ileum. Insights from a population-based epidemiological study and implications in surgical management Ann Surg 253 2 223 30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. BS Nedrebø K Søreide MT Eriksen LM Dørum JT Kvaløy JA Søreide H Kørner 2011 Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. Survival effect of implementing national treatment strategies for curatively resected colonic and rectal cancer Br J Surg 98 716 23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. P Quirke R Steele J Monson R Grieve S Khanna J Couture C O’Callaghan AS Myint E Bessell LC Thompson M Parmar RJ Stephens D Sebag-Montefiore MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group 2009 Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial Lancet 373 9666 821 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Y Hashiguchi K Hase H Ueno H Mochizuki E Shinto J Yamamoto 2011 Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery Br J Surg 98 8 1171 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. W Van Gijn CA Marijnen ID Nagtegaal EM Kranenbarg H Putter T Wiggers HJ Rutten L Påhlman B Glimelius CJ van de Velde Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group 2011 Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial Lancet Oncol 12 575 82.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. P How O Shihab P Tekkis G Brown P Quirke R Heald B Moran 2011 A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era Surg Oncol 20 149 55.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. S Stelzner C Koehler J Stelzer A Sims H Witzigmann 2011 Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer – a systematic overview Int J Colorectal Dis 26 1227 40.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. SB Kelly SJ Mills DM Bradburn AA Ratcliffe DW Borowski Northern Region Colorectal Cancer Audit Group 2011 Effect of the circumferential resection margin on survival following rectal cancer surgery Br J Surg 98 4 573 81.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. J Mulsow S Merkel A Agaimy W Hohenberger 2011 Outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases Br J Surg 98 1785 91.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. LF De Campos-Lobato DP Geisler A da Luz Moreira L Stocchi D Dietz MF Kalady 2011 Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: The Impact of Longer Interval between Chemoradiation and Surgery J Gastrointest Surg 15 3 444 50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. J Evans D Tait I Swift K Pennert P Tekkis A Wotherspoon I Chau D Cunningham G Brown 2011 Timing of surgery following preoperative therapy in rectal cancer: the need for a prospective randomized trial Dis Colon Rectum 54 1251 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. J Kang H Hur BS Min NK Kim KY Lee 2011 Prognostic Impact of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Ann Surg Oncol 18 3 704 10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. MH Van der Pas S Meijer OS Hoekstra II Riphagen HC de Vet DL Knol NC van Grieken WJ Meijerink 2011 Sentinel-lymph-node procedure in colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Oncol 12 540 50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. AM Lacy 2008 The Long-term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopy-assisted Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer Annals of Surgery 248 1 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. MJ Huang JL Liang H Wang L Kang YH Deng JP Wang 2011 Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes Int J Colorectal Dis 26 4 415 21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. H Ohtani Y Tamamori Y Arimoto Y Nishiguchi K Maeda K Hirakawa 2011 A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer J Cancer 2 425 34.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. JC Carmichael H Masoomi S Mills MJ Stamos NT Nguyen 2011 Utilization of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery for cancer at academic medical centers: does site of surgery affect rate of laparoscopy Am Surg 77 1300 4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. T Makino PJ Shukla F Rubino JW Milsom 2012 The Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes After Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: A Review Ann Surg 255 2 228 36.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. PM Verheijen AR Stevenson JW Lumley AJ Clark RW Stitz DA Clark 2011 Laparoscopic resection of advanced colorectal cancer Br J Surg 98 3 427 30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. S Yamamoto S Fujita T Akasu R Inada M Takawa Y Moriya 2011 Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancerand Comparison with Open Approach Dig Surg 28 5–6 404 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. JS Park GS Choi SH Jun S Hasegawa Y Sakai 2011 Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes Ann Surg 254 941 6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. T Sammour A Kahokehr S Srinivasa IP Bissett AG Hill 2011 Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery Ann Surg 253 35 43.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. SJ Kim GO Ryu BJ Choi JG Kim KJ Lee SC Lee ST Oh 2011 The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Ann Surg 254 933 40.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. HT Papaconstantinou JS Thomas 2011 Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy Surgery 150 820 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Y Wu YY Wu S Li BS Zhu K Zhao XD Yang CG Xing 2011 TEM and conventional rectal surgery for T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis Hepatogastroenterology 58 364 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. G Sgourakis S Lanitis I Gockel C Kontovounisios C Karaliotas K Tsiftsi A Tsiamis CC Karaliotas 2011 Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of outcomes Am Surg 77 761 72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. RO Perez A Habr-Gama GP São Julião I Proscurshim A Scanavini Neto J Gama-Rodrigues 2011 Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for residual rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is associated with significant immediate pain and hospital readmission rates Dis Colon Rectum 54 545 51.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. ME Allaix F Rebecchi C Giaccone M Mistrangelo M Morino 2011 Long-term functional results and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery Br J Surg 98 11 1635 43.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. K Sasaki S Kazama E Sunami NH Tsuno H Nozawa H Nagawa J Kitayama 2012 One-stage segmental colectomy and primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic irrigation and total colonoscopy for patients with obstruction due to left-sided colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 55 72 8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Angenete E , Asplund D, Bergström M, Park PO: Stenting for colorectal cancer obstruction compared to surgery – a study of consecutive patients in a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011 Nov 29.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. G Manes M de Bellis L Fuccio A Repici E Masci S Ardizzone B Mangiavillano A Carlino GB Rossi P Occhipinti V Cennamo 2011 Endoscopic palliation in patients with incurable malignant colorectal obstruction by means of self-expanding metal stent: analysis of results and predictors of outcomes in a large multicenter series Arch Surg 146 10 1157 62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. LH Iversen M Kratmann M Bøje S Laurberg 2011 Self-expanding metallic stents as bridge to surgery in obstructing colorectal cancer Br J Surg 98 275 81.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. T Akiyoshi M Ueno Y Fukunaga S Nagayama Y Fujimoto T Konishi H Kuroyanagi T Yamaguchi 2011 Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer Am J Surg 202 259 64.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. M Schietroma F Carlei EM Cecilia F Piccione Z Bianchi G Amicucci 2012 Colorectal Infraperitoneal Anastomosis: The Effects of Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen Administration on the Anastomotic Dehiscence J Gastrointest Surg 16 2 427 34.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40. Choy PY , Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A: Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 Sep 7; 9: CD004320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41. AS Scheer RP Boushey S Liang S Doucette AM O’Connor D Moher 2011 The long-term gastrointestinal functional outcomes following curative anterior resection in adults with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dis Colon Rectum 54 1589 97.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42. S Pucciarelli P Del Bianco F Efficace S Serpentini C Capirci A De Paoli A Amato D Cuicchi D Nitti 2011 Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study Ann Surg 253 71 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43. Y Panis L Maggiori G Caranhac F Bretagnol E Vicaut 2011 Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients Ann Surg 254 743 4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44. K Bachmann G Krause T Rawnaq L Tomkotter Y Vashist S Shahmiri JR Izbicki M Bockhorn 2011 Impact of early or delayed elective resection in complicated diverticulitis World J Gastroenterol 17 5274 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45. GA Binda A Arezzo A Serventi L Bonelli 2012 On behalf of the Italian Study Group on Complicated Diverticulosis (GISDIC). Multicentre observational study of the natural history of left-sided acute diverticulitis Br J Surg 99 276 85.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46. G Maconi G Barbara C Bosetti R Cuomo B Annibale 2011 Treatment of diverticular disease of the colon and prevention of acute diverticulitis: a systematic review Dis Colon Rectum 54 1326 38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47. C Unlü L Daniels BC Vrouenraets MA Boermeester 2012 A systematic review of high-fibre dietary therapy in diverticular disease Int J Colorectal Dis 27 4 419 27.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48. P Nandivada V Poylin D Nagle 2012 Advances in the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease Curr Opin Gastroenterol 28 1 47 51.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49. S Pandey G Luther K Umanskiy G Malhotra MA Rubin RD Hurst A Fichera 2011 Minimally invasive pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: is there a benefit in staging Dis Colon Rectum 54 306 10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50. IE Berndtsson EK Carlsson EI Persson EA Lindholm 2011 Long-term adjustment to living with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 54 193 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51. A Fichera 2011 Laparoscopic treatment of Crohn's disease World J Surg 35 7 1500 4.

Submit Your Manuscript

 

The author instruction is available in PDF.
Please, download the file from HERE

 

Senior editors

Editor(s)-in-Chief: Oláh, Attila

Editorial Board

  • DR. BÁLINT ANDRÁS
  • DR. BEZSILLA JÁNOS
  • DR. BOROS MIHÁLY
  • DR. BURSICS ATTILA
  • DR. DAMJANOVICH LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. ENTZ LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. GULYÁS GUSZTÁV
  • DR. HARSÁNYI LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. HORVÁTH ÖRS PÉTER
  • DR. ISTVÁN GÁBOR
  • DR. KECSKÉS LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. KÓBORI LÁSZLÓ
  • DR. KUPCSULIK PÉTER
  • DR. LÁZÁR GYÖRGY
  • DR. LESTÁR BÉLA
  • DR. MÁTRAI ZOLTÁN
  • DR. MOHOS ELEMÉR
  • DR. MOLNÁR F. TAMÁS
  • DR. ONDREJKA PÁL
  • DR. PAPP ANDRÁS
  • DR. RÉNYI-VÁMOS FERENC
  • DR. ROMICS LÁSZLÓ JR.
  • DR. SÓTONYI PÉTER
  • DR. SZIJÁRTÓ ATTILA
  • DR. SZŰCS ÁKOS
  • DR. VEREBÉLY TIBOR
  • DR. VERECZKEI ANDRÁS

Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital, Surgery
Vasvári Pál út 2. H-9024 Győr, Hungary
Phone: +36 96 503 320 --- Fax: +36 96 507 936
E-mail: olaha@petz.gyor.hu

Indexing and Abstracting Services:

  • Index Medicus
  • PubMed Central

 

2020  
CrossRef Documents 37
WoS Cites 45
Wos H-index 8
Days from submission to acceptance 60
Days from acceptance to publication 63

 

2019  
WoS
Cites
63
CrossRef
Documents
31

 

Magyar Sebészet
Publication Model Hybrid
Submission Fee none
Article Processing Charge 900 EUR/article
Printed Color Illustrations 40 EUR (or 10 000 HUF) + VAT / piece
Regional discounts on country of the funding agency World Bank Lower-middle-income economies: 50%
World Bank Low-income economies: 100%
Further Discounts Editorial Board / Advisory Board members: 50%
Corresponding authors, affiliated to an EISZ member institution subscribing to the journal package of Akadémiai Kiadó: 100%
Subscription Information Online subsscription: 276 EUR / 372 USD
Print + online subscription: 320 EUR / 440 USD
Online subscribers are entitled access to all back issues published by Akadémiai Kiadó for each title for the duration of the subscription, as well as Online First content for the subscribed content.
Purchase per Title Individual articles are sold on the displayed price.

Magyar Sebészet
Language Hungarian
Size B5
Year of
Foundation
1947
Publication
Programme
2021 Volume 74
Volumes
per Year
1
Issues
per Year
4
Founder Magyar Sebész Társaság -- Hungarian Surgical Society
Founder's
Address
H-1082 Budapest, Hungary Üllői út 78.
Publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
Publisher's
Address
H-1117 Budapest, Hungary 1516 Budapest, PO Box 245.
Responsible
Publisher
Chief Executive Officer, Akadémiai Kiadó
ISSN 0025-0295 (Print)
ISSN 1789-4301 (Online)

Monthly Content Usage

Abstract Views Full Text Views PDF Downloads
Feb 2021 8 0 0
Mar 2021 4 2 0
Apr 2021 3 0 0
May 2021 7 0 0
Jun 2021 15 0 0
Jul 2021 9 0 0
Aug 2021 0 0 0